InterMob: a Randomized Controlled Trial Aimed at Reducing Car Use in Regular Car Users
NCT ID: NCT05096000
Last Updated: 2024-06-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-21
2025-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To meet these objectives, 300 regular car users living in Grenoble will be recruited and randomized in one of two arms:
1. experimental group that will receive the InterMob intervention: six months of free public transport/access to a bicycle, and behavior change techniques (personalized transport advice, setting of mobility change goals, considering possible obstacles; 6 months of motivational messages to prompt goal setting and self-monitoring).
2. active control group that will receive information about air pollution (discussion about the health consequences of air pollution, the association between air pollution and car use; 6 months of messages to prompt air pollution monitoring.) Follow-up measures will be carried out until 24 months after the beginning of the study (8-day measurement sessions). Five sessions will involve wearing a GPS/accelerometer, and an air pollution sensor. Participants will complete mobility logs and questionnaires measuring the psychological mechanisms related to their mobility (habits, intentions, self-efficacy), and socio-economical characteristics (number of children, accessibility) during the 8 sessions.
The investigators hypothesize that the participants allocated to experimental group will reduce the car use and increase the use of alternative modes to the car (biking, walking, public transport, and carpooling) more than the participants of the control group, and that these changes will remain. The investigators hypothesize that mobility changes will be mediated by intention and self-efficacy. The investigators hypothesize that the efficacy of the intervention will be moderated by socio-spatial factors (number of children, travel distances) and psychological factors (self-control).
The main criterion will be car use reduction and the use of alternative modes to the car. In addition, the investigators will assess physical activity (minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity), the exposure to air pollution, the quality of life and the carbon footprint associated to transport.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Technologies for Participatory Medicine and Health Promotion in the Elderly Population
NCT03504813
GISMO - Geographical Information Support for Healthy Mobility
NCT03098719
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the Initial Medication Adherence Intervention
NCT05026775
Telecommunication Technology-based Online Survey
NCT06159699
Advancing Tools for Human Early Lifecourse Exposome Research and Translation- Adolescence Follow-up of the HELIX Subcohort
NCT05158010
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* the proportion of trips made by car (49% of the trips made in Grenoble Metropole are made by car according to the EMD, 2010 which is the most recent survey in the area currently available),
* the potential target population's transport behavior (a percentage of the population can be classified as reluctant drivers with positive attitudes toward other modes of transportation, this population makes 80% of their trips and could potentially reduce their car use to 64% considering the characteristics of the trips)
* the impact of past interventions (car reduction of -17%, from 50% to 33% of car use, Brockman \& Fox, 2011).
The investigators considered a statistical power of 0.8, and a significance level of 0.05 for a proportion of 80% or 50% of trips made by car in the control group. In order to detect a difference of 15% when the share of trips made by car is reduced from 80% to 65% or from 50 to 35%, the investigators need 300 individuals (i.e., 150 individuals in each group).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
InterMob: a behavioral and economical intervention
* 6 months of free transport/bicycle (12.5 Adding objects in the BCT, Michie et al., 2011)
* Two meetings with a coach :
1. st meeting: discussion about the motivations to change (motivational interviewing and 5.2 Salience of consequences, BCT), personalized advice of transport (4.1 Instruction on how to perform the behavior, BCT), mobility change goals, and action planning (1.1 Goal setting and 1.4 Action planning, BCT), solutions to possible obstacles (1.2 Problem solving, BCT)
2. nd meeting: discussion about the goals and the obstacles lived and resolved. If needed, personalized transport advice is given.
* "Goals notebook" to fill up for 6 months (goals need to be set every 2 weeks and obstacles if experienced)
* Weekly SMS during 6 months, prompting a) to set and adapt goals (1.7 Review outcome, BCT) and b) to do a self-feedback related to mobility change (e.g. a more important well-being) (2.4 Self-monitoring of outcomes, BCT's taxonomy)
InterMob: a randomized controlled trial aimed at reducing car use in regular car users
Intermob is a theory- and evidence-based behavioral intervention that combines public transport/bicycle and motivational techniques (action planning, personalized transport advice, goal setting).
Air pollution information: an informational group
Active control group focused on air pollution information:
* Two meetings with a coach:
1. st meeting: Discussion about air pollution (definition, sources, population most affected, levels in Grenoble, the consequences on health, pollution peaks), air pollution and car use (video about the pollution exposure of car drivers and the consequences of fine particles) and, a discussion about the benefit and disadvantages of using a car (5.2 Salience of consequences according to BCT's taxonomy)
2. nd meeting: Discussion about air quality during the last weeks and they check the quality of air of the last week.
* "Observation notebook" to fill up for 6 months (quality of air in Grenoble and the pollution peaks every 2 weeks)
* Weekly SMS during 6 months prompting a) to write down the air quality of the air every two weeks and b) write down any pollution peak announced in the television/radio/telephone
Active control: Air pollution information
The active control intervention is based on a discussion about air pollution, the effects of air pollution on health, the association between air pollution and transport.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
InterMob: a randomized controlled trial aimed at reducing car use in regular car users
Intermob is a theory- and evidence-based behavioral intervention that combines public transport/bicycle and motivational techniques (action planning, personalized transport advice, goal setting).
Active control: Air pollution information
The active control intervention is based on a discussion about air pollution, the effects of air pollution on health, the association between air pollution and transport.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
• Profile: employed / unemployed / retired / on work-study or apprenticeship
* If employed : Work and live in the SMAAG territory (Metropole of Grenoble + Grésivaudan + Pays voironnais)
* If in apprenticeship/training program: Working, studying and living in the SMAAG territory (Metropole of Grenoble + Grésivaudan + Pays voironnais)
* If unemployed / retired : Reside in the SMAAG territory (Metropole of Grenoble + Grésivaudan + Pays voironnais)
* The car/motorcycle/scooter is the main mode of travel during the week (excluding weekends)
* Travels 3, 4, or 5 days by car (excluding weekdays)
* Thinks about reducing car use or has started to reduce car use - Expect to live and work in the Grenoble area in the next 2 years (Very likely and likely options)
Exclusion Criteria
* Living outside the Metropole of Grenoble + Grésivaudan + Pays voironnais
* Working outside (Metropole of Grenoble + Grésivaudan + Pays voironnais)
* Studying outside (Metropole of Grenoble + Grésivaudan + Pays voironnais)
* Car/motorcycle/scooter is not the main mode of travel
* Travels 0, 1 or 2 days a week by car
* Does not intend to reduce the frequency of car use
* Does not expect to live and/or work in the Grenoble area in the next 2 years
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IDEX - Univ. Grenoble-Alpes
UNKNOWN
Région Auvergne-Rhône Alpes
UNKNOWN
Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique, France
OTHER
ADEME
UNKNOWN
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
OTHER_GOV
Métropole Grenoble-Alpes
UNKNOWN
Aina Chalabaev
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aina Chalabaev
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aïna Chalabaev, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Laboratoire SENS, Univ. Grenoble-Alpes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Univ. Grenoble-Alpes
Saint-Martin-d'Hères, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Teran-Escobar C, Duche S, Bouscasse H, Isoard-Gatheur S, Juen P, Lacoste L, Lyon-Caen S, Mathy S, Ployon E, Risch A, Sarrazin P, Slama R, Tabaka K, Treibich C, Chardonnel S, Chalabaev A. InterMob: a 24-month randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an intervention including behavioural change techniques and free transport versus an intervention including air pollution awareness-raising on car use reduction among regular car users living in Grenoble, France. BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;22(1):1763. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14099-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
INTERMOBFRUGA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.