Satiety Responses and Oral Processing Characteristics of Commonly Consumed Meals
NCT ID: NCT05071170
Last Updated: 2023-08-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
48 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-05-05
2023-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, no studies to date have investigated how differences in food processing influences food texture characteristics and oral processing behaviours, and subsequently impact on individuals' satiety responses and their subsequent food intake. The proposed study will examine the role of oral processing behaviours and/ or food processing (i.e. minimally processed, processed and ultra-processed) on satiety responses and the subsequent food intake
Objectives: The objectives of the study are to characterise the differences in oral processing behaviours (i.e. eating rate, bite size, chew per bite, oral exposure time etc.) and satiety responses of meals that differ in their degree of processing, and to further investigate how texture-based differences in oral processing behaviours modified by degree of food processing influence the satiety responses (fullness over the time) and subsequent food intake.
Study design: A total of 1 screening session (Session 1) and 4 test sessions (Sessions 2 to 5) and 2x2 randomised crossover design where participants receive 4 treatments (i.e. 4 test meals) over 4 test sessions
Study population: Healthy males ( n=50), aged 21-50 years with BMI between 18-25 kg/m2
Intervention: Session 1 involves tasting of up to 16 food items and computer task to rate and evaluate their perception and health behaviour. Sessions 2 to 5 involve evaluation of sensory characteristics, video recording of participants eating, and wrist-worn accelerometer to track wrist movement while consuming the 4 test meals.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Four Instant Maize Porridges on Satiety Measures
NCT07204470
Effects of Pulse Consumption, Gut Microbiome, and Appetite in Healthy Participants
NCT07043712
Combined Effects of Meal Frequency and Protein Load on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors
NCT02529228
Breakfast Test Products and Acute Satiety Scores
NCT02575131
The Effect of Oat Based Breakfast Cereals on Satiety and Food Intake
NCT01666574
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objectives of the study are to characterise the differences in oral processing behaviours (i.e. eating rate, bite size, chew per bite, oral exposure time etc.) and satiety responses of meals that differ in their degree of processing, and to further investigate how texture-based differences in oral processing behaviours modified by degree of food processing (i.e. un-, minimally-processed, processed and ultra-processed foods) influence the satiety responses (fullness over the time) and subsequent food intake.
Study Design:
The current study will require participants to attend a total of 5 study sessions involving 1 screening session (session 1) and 4 test sessions (sessions 2 to 5). Each session will last for approximately one to 1.5 hours (Screening), or 1.5 to 3 hours each (4 test sessions), respectively. maximum of 50 participants will be recruited for this study.
The perceived sensory, oral processing behaviours, and satiety responses across different meals (e.g. rice with meat and vegetable, meat with potato and salad, etc.) will be assessed using video recording, sensory and appetite assessment on 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), respectively. The subsequent food intake at the ad libitum snack for different meals will also be measured using a Sartorius balance. The dietary behaviour, perception and portion selection of foods varying in level of processing and nutrient sources will also be evaluated using a Health Behaviour Questionnaire and a simple computerised task.
Test Foods:
All food that are consumed are commercially available, safe for human consumption and prepared in line with safe hygienic food preparation (e.g. Meals: rice with meat and vegetable, meat with potato and salad etc.; Sweet and savoury snacks: biscuits, chips etc.)
Screening (Session 1, 1-1.5 hour):
All potential participants will be asked to give informed consent before taking part in any of the research activities. Participants are to complete a screening questionnaire and basic anthropometric measurements such as height, weight, skinfold measurements and percentage body fat using a Bioelectrical Impedance Analyser (Tanita) will be taken.
Successfully screened participants will proceed to complete a Food Preference Questionnaire, Health Behaviour Questionnaire and taste no more than 16 samples to rate and evaluate their perception and health behaviour for the foods varying in degree of processing and nutrient sources at the remaining of the screening session.
Test sessions (Sessions 2 to 5, 1.5 to 3 hours each):
Participants will attend 1 session per week for four consecutive weeks to evaluate up to 4 fixed portion test meals across for lunch-time sessions, i.e. 1 fixed portion test meal per session. On each test day, participants will also be asked to consume 1 ad libitum snack after 2 hours of consuming the fixed portion test meal.
Participant will be required to fast from 11.00 pm the evening before and refrain from engaging in vigorous physical activities.
On each test day, participants will be asked to arrive at CNRC between 8.00-9.00am and complete a set of appetite ratings (pre-breakfast rating). Following the pre-breakfast rating, participants will receive a standardised, fixed portion breakfast to take away with them and consume at fixed interval during the morning (before the lunch). The purpose is to equilibrate their appetite need state ahead of the fixed portion test meal at lunch session. Participants will consume the breakfast within 15 minutes, after which complete a second set of appetite ratings (post-breakfast ratings). Participants will refrain from consuming anything except water and continue to complete the appetite rating at 15 or 30 minutes' intervals before coming to CNRC for their lunch (between 12.00-1.00pm), prompted by reminder set on their mobile device.
The lunch session will be scheduled from midday onwards (between 12.00-1.00pm) and will begin with a set of appetite rating (pre-lunch rating). Participants will be served a fixed portion test meal along with a glass of water. Participants will then be asked to consume the fixed portion test meal within 20 minutes. Participants' eating behaviour at lunch will be webcam recorded in order to record and behaviourally code their oral processing behaviour (i.e. eating rate, bite number, bite size etc). In addition, Participants will be asked to wear a wrist worn accelerometer (M5StickC ESP32-PICO Mini loT Development Kit, China) on the hand they eat with to track the wrist movement while eating. After completed eating, participants will be required to rate its sensory characteristics, such as liking, familiarity, overall flavour intensity, firmness, crunchiness, chewiness, saltiness and sweetness etc on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) using a computer. Participants will be required to complete post-lunch appetite ratings at 15 or 30 minutes' intervals for 120 minutes (post-lunch ratings).
After approximately two hours, participants will return to CNRC for an ad-libitum afternoon snack, and rate their appetite before consuming the ad-libitum snack. Participants will be instructed to consume in their normal way and to eat until comfortably full. Participants will leave CNRC after the snack session and asked to complete a food diary to record his food intake for the rest of the day.
The sensory, oral processing characteristics, and satiety responses for 4 different fixed portion test meals will be assessed. The subsequent food intake at ad libitum snack for different meals will also be measured.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Degree of food processing and food texture
Processed vs unprocessed foods based on NOVA classification
Soft and hard foods manipulated by cooking method
Ad libitum energy intake
Investigate post meal satiety and subsequent post meal energy intake according to degree of food processing and eating behaviour
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ad libitum energy intake
Investigate post meal satiety and subsequent post meal energy intake according to degree of food processing and eating behaviour
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged between 21 and 50-year-old
* Are of normal weight (BMI 18-25kg/m2)
* Stable weight for the previous 12 months (\<5kg weight fluctuation in the previous year)
* Healthy dentition and ability to bite, chew and swallow normally
* No history of pain or discomfort in jaw movements or excessive teeth clenching or grinding
* No caries or periodontal disease
Exclusion Criteria
* Have any dislikes, intolerances or allergies to foods or common food ingredients e.g. nuts, soya, wheat, gluten, cereal, fruits, biscuits, dairy products, rice, vegetable, meat, seafood, sugar and sweetener, gelatin, natural food colourings or flavourings (e.g. MSG), etc.
* Have any specific dietary requirements and/ or restrictions (e.g. Vegan/ vegetarian, religious beliefs, lactose intolerance, calorie restricted diet etc.)
* Have sinus problems that affect your taste and smell
* Have known glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency
* Are taking insulin or medication known to affect your appetite or metabolism
* Have major chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer or diabetes mellitus
* Have active Tuberculosis (TB) or currently receiving treatment for TB
* Have any known Chronic Infection or known to suffer from or have previously suffered from or is a carrier of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
* Are a member of the research team or their immediate family members. Immediate family member is defined as a spouse, parent, child, or sibling, whether biological or legally adopted
* Are enrolled in a concurrent research study judged not to be scientifically or medically compatible with the study of the CNRC
21 Years
50 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pey Sze Teo, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Singapore Institute Of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), A*STAR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI)/Clinical Nutrition Research Centre
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-036
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.