Implementation Trial of Predictive Modeling to Enhance Diagnosis and Improve Treatment in Pediatric Septic Shock
NCT ID: NCT05065333
Last Updated: 2023-04-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1345 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-16
2023-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sepsis Electronic Prompting for Timely Intervention and Care for Emergency Department Patients
NCT06117605
Prehospital Antibiotics Against Sepsis Trial
NCT01988428
Predictive Model for Multidrug Resistance in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Sepsis
NCT07167173
Impact of a Prehospital Sepsis Protocol on Timely Antibiotic Administration and Subsequent Adverse Events
NCT05502107
A Prediction Model of 28-day Mortality in Septic Shock
NCT04915625
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Tools that have been deployed to improve diagnosis in pediatric sepsis either diagnose it after organ dysfunction criteria have been met, or depend heavily on subspecialty physician judgment and have not been tested outside of tertiary pediatric hospitals. Thus, the evidence-based 2020 Surviving Sepsis Children's Guidelines for pediatric sepsis stated that "high-quality trials on pediatric sepsis recognition are lacking, and data are not sufficient to suggest any particular screening tool," and identified pediatric sepsis recognition trials as an important research need. Despite this, the guidelines weakly recommended screening patients "who present as acutely unwell" for septic shock, citing very low quality evidence. The guidelines also stated that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of any existing pediatric sepsis screening tools.
This study addresses the gap in knowledge about the effectiveness of pediatric sepsis prediction tools. The study team has developed and retrospectively validated early diagnostic models that leverage clinical data in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) to predict septic shock in children the emergency setting \[1, 2\]. In order to address concerns about alert fatigue and antibiotic overuse, these predictive models were designed to identify patients at high risk for shock among patients in whom clinicians initially had some suspicion for sepsis.
In this pilot implementation trial, Clinical Decision Support based on septic shock prediction models will be introduced to 4 pediatric Emergency Departments (EDs) within the Children's Hospital Colorado care system in a stepped wedge design, in addition to routine clinical care. Routine clinical care at all study sites includes existing sepsis pathways, order sets, and quality metrics that are aligned with the national Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Collaborative and the Pediatric Surviving Sepsis guidelines. The primary outcome will be the proportion of sepsis patients who receive guideline-concordant septic shock care after implementation of the CDS, and the secondary outcome will be time-to-antibiotic after sepsis recognition.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Septic Shock Clinical Decision Support
Emergency Department sites in this arm will have Clinical Decision Support (CDS) alerts active in the Electronic Health Record during clinical ED care of patients with suspected sepsis, in addition to following usual institutional standard of care for sepsis. The CDS will alert providers to patients at high risk for developing septic shock.
Septic Shock Clinical Decision Support
The intervention will be activating a septic shock clinical decision support tool (CDS) in the Electronic Health Record at the site, making it available to trigger and alert Emergency Department providers during clinical care. Patients will be identified when providers suspect sepsis and initiate a sepsis evaluation, using the institutional, clinically-standard, sepsis pathway/orderset. After the CDS is triggered, it will use available Electronic Health Record data to calculate the risk of septic shock, using previously-published predictive models \[Ref 1, 2\]. The CDS will notify providers if the patient is at elevated risk of septic shock and prompt them to follow institutional standard care for septic shock (including close monitoring, complete laboratory evaluation for organ dysfunction, and immediate clinical involvement of an attending Pediatric Emergency Physician). All clinical care decisions will be determined by the providers.
Clinical Diagnosis Only
Emergency Department sites in this arm will follow the institutional standard for sepsis care without Clinical Decision Support. Standard care includes clinical diagnosis of sepsis supported by institutional sepsis education, a sepsis pathway and orderset.
Clinical Diagnosis Only
Emergency Department sites in this arm will not have Clinical Decision Support for septic shock visible in the Electronic Health Record for providers at the site. Providers will follow usual institutional standards of sepsis care.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Septic Shock Clinical Decision Support
The intervention will be activating a septic shock clinical decision support tool (CDS) in the Electronic Health Record at the site, making it available to trigger and alert Emergency Department providers during clinical care. Patients will be identified when providers suspect sepsis and initiate a sepsis evaluation, using the institutional, clinically-standard, sepsis pathway/orderset. After the CDS is triggered, it will use available Electronic Health Record data to calculate the risk of septic shock, using previously-published predictive models \[Ref 1, 2\]. The CDS will notify providers if the patient is at elevated risk of septic shock and prompt them to follow institutional standard care for septic shock (including close monitoring, complete laboratory evaluation for organ dysfunction, and immediate clinical involvement of an attending Pediatric Emergency Physician). All clinical care decisions will be determined by the providers.
Clinical Diagnosis Only
Emergency Department sites in this arm will not have Clinical Decision Support for septic shock visible in the Electronic Health Record for providers at the site. Providers will follow usual institutional standards of sepsis care.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All providers (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants) at Children's Hospital Colorado Emergency Care sites will be included
Exclusion Criteria
Patients whose secondary data will be used to assess the outcomes of the intervention will be 60 days through 18 years old.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
FED
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Halden F Scott, MD, MSCS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Colorado, Denver
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Scott HF, Colborn KL, Sevick CJ, Bajaj L, Kissoon N, Deakyne Davies SJ, Kempe A. Development and Validation of a Predictive Model of the Risk of Pediatric Septic Shock Using Data Known at the Time of Hospital Arrival. J Pediatr. 2020 Feb;217:145-151.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.09.079. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
Scott HF, Colborn KL, Sevick CJ, Bajaj L, Deakyne Davies SJ, Fairclough D, Kissoon N, Kempe A. Development and Validation of a Model to Predict Pediatric Septic Shock Using Data Known 2 Hours After Hospital Arrival. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):16-26. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002589.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21-2916
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.