The Development of a Patient Reported Outcomes Measure Committed to the Watch-and-wait Program for Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT05040646
Last Updated: 2023-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-11-01
2023-03-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rectal Study: Value of Repeated FDG-PET-CT Scans in Rectal Cancer
NCT00576563
Multicenter Cohort Prospective Study on Multidisciplinary Treatment of Rectal Cancer
NCT01651026
Functional Outcome of Organ Preservation After Neo-adjuvant Chemo Radiation for Rectal Cancer
NCT02278653
Improving Diagnosis and Treatment for Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT07054047
Watchful Waiting. An Observational Study of Patients With Rectal Cancer After Concomitant Radiation and Chemotherapy
NCT00952926
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) reflect the patients' evaluation of their symptoms, FO and QoL. In the W\&W program various PROMs (e.g. EORTC-CR29/C30, LARS, SF-36) are used to assess the these different outcomes. However, most of the PROMs used are developed and validated in a surgical patient group. So the relevance and usefulness of these PROMs may be limited in W\&W patients.
For use in clinical practice, a short PROM would support follow-up care as it provides a clear overview of the problems W\&W patients experience.
This paper describes the protocol for the development of an international tool that can be used to assess burden of disease in patients enrolled in the W\&W program for rectal cancer. We will use the Delphi methodology to reach consensus about items that should be included in the novel tool. The aim of this tool is to improve direct patient care during the entire Watch-and-Wait program.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients
Patients who follow the watch-and-wait program for rectal cancer.
Delphi exercise
During the Delphi exercise both patients and experts will participate in two anonymous online survey rounds where different items/outcomes will be presented that are possibly related to rectal cancer and the W\&W program. Both groups are asked to rate each item on a 9 point likert scale with respect to the importancy of the item.
After the two subsequent rounds, participants will be invited to attend a consensus meeting, where final consensus about the most important outcomes will be reached.
Experts
Surgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologist and other medical personnel who are involved in the treatment of rectal cancer and the watch-and-wait program.
Delphi exercise
During the Delphi exercise both patients and experts will participate in two anonymous online survey rounds where different items/outcomes will be presented that are possibly related to rectal cancer and the W\&W program. Both groups are asked to rate each item on a 9 point likert scale with respect to the importancy of the item.
After the two subsequent rounds, participants will be invited to attend a consensus meeting, where final consensus about the most important outcomes will be reached.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Delphi exercise
During the Delphi exercise both patients and experts will participate in two anonymous online survey rounds where different items/outcomes will be presented that are possibly related to rectal cancer and the W\&W program. Both groups are asked to rate each item on a 9 point likert scale with respect to the importancy of the item.
After the two subsequent rounds, participants will be invited to attend a consensus meeting, where final consensus about the most important outcomes will be reached.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients are included into the Watch-and-Wait program
* Experts involved in the treatment of rectal cancer
* Experts involved in the Watch-and-Wait program
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stéphanie Breukink, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maastricht UMC
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Greenhalgh J, Gooding K, Gibbons E, Dalkin S, Wright J, Valderas J, Black N. How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Sep 15;2:42. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0061-6. eCollection 2018 Dec.
Ishaque S, Karnon J, Chen G, Nair R, Salter AB. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Qual Life Res. 2019 Mar;28(3):567-592. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2016-z. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013 Jan 28;346:f167. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f167.
Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.
Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM, Lammering G, Nelemans PJ, Engelen SM, van Dam RM, Jansen RL, Sosef M, Leijtens JW, Hulsewe KW, Buijsen J, Beets GL. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 10;29(35):4633-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7176. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
van der Valk MJM, Hilling DE, Bastiaannet E, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Beets GL, Figueiredo NL, Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Renehan AG, van de Velde CJH; IWWD Consortium. Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study. Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2537-2545. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31078-X.
Habr-Gama A, Sao Juliao GP, Fernandez LM, Vailati BB, Andrade A, Araujo SEA, Gama-Rodrigues J, Perez RO. Achieving a Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation That Does Not Require Surgical Resection: It May Take Longer Than You Think! Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Jul;62(7):802-808. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001338.
Hsu, C. and B. Sandford, The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus-Practical assessment, research & evaluation. Pract Assessment. Res Eval, 2007. 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-2805
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.