Validation of a Predictive Model After Complete Response in Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00969657
Last Updated: 2015-01-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-08-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Prediction of rectal tumor response after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) might be helpful in individualizing treatment strategies, i.e., selecting patients who need less invasive surgery or another radiotherapy strategy instead of resection. For rectal cancer it is known that 10-30% of the patients will respond with a pathologic complete response (pCR) after CRT. From a retrospective study with multivariate analysis of both clinical and 2-\[18F\] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) data, it was found that adding FDG-PET data collected before and after CRT leads to a more predictive model compared to evaluating only pretreatment clinical data. To validate this model, this registration study is proposed. Furthermore, it has been found that FDG-PET during treatment is very predictive for response and a more favorable time point to adapt treatment. Also, there are indications that adding blood biomarkers to the data, results in higher accuracy for response prediction compared to clinical and imaging data alone. Therefore, FDG-PET during treatment and blood sampling are included in the protocol to improve the accuracy of the prediction models.
Objective of the study:
The long-term research objective is to be able to select rectum cancer patients who could receive a less invasive treatment. If prediction of response is possible, surgery may be avoided when complete response after chemoradiotherapy is expected or performed with smaller incisions if stage reduction is significant. This support decision system helps to individualize patient treatment and can improve the quality of life for the patient.
Study design:
28x radiotherapy. On day 15 of radiotherapy en 8 weeks after radiotherapy: 1 PET-CT scan Before radiotherapy, on day 15 and 8 weeks after radiotherapy: blood sample taken.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Minimal Invasive Strategies for Good and Complete Response to Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer
NCT00939666
Rectal Study: Value of Repeated FDG-PET-CT Scans in Rectal Cancer
NCT00576563
Comprehensive Management of Rectal Cancer
NCT06839508
"Wait-and-see" Policy for Complete Responders After Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
NCT03426397
Assessment of Response Before, During and After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients
NCT01171300
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The long-term research objective is to be able to select rectum cancer patients who could receive a less invasive treatment. If prediction of response is possible, surgery may be avoided when complete response after chemoradiotherapy is expected or performed with smaller incisions if stage reduction is significant. This support decision system helps to individualize patient treatment and can improve the quality of life for the patient.
Aim of the study
The main aim is to validate a predictive model for pathologic complete response (ypT0N0) in rectal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy by multi-centric prospective data collection. The second aim is to collect extra data for improvement of the accuracy of the prediction models with new variables. This new model will be validated later in the model development process.
Hypothesis
General hypothesis:
The validated accuracy of predictive models for pathologic complete response after chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients is high enough to tailor treatment (surgery/non-surgery and/or administer extra radiation boosts) in clinical practice.
Specific hypotheses:
1. The performance of the developed models on the validation data is at least equal to the performance achieved during the model development process.
2. The performance of a new model based on the addition of variables performs better than the previous model
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* UICC stage I-III
* Only primary tumors; no recurrences
* Only concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment
* Willing and able to comply with the study prescriptions
* 18 years or older
* Have given written informed consent before patient registration
* No previous radiotherapy to the pelvis
Exclusion Criteria
* History of prior pelvis radiotherapy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maastricht Radiation Oncology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippe Lambin, prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Maastricht Radiation Oncology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MAASTRO clinic
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Roelofs E, Dekker A, Meldolesi E, van Stiphout RGPM, Valentini V, Lambin P. International data-sharing for radiotherapy research: an open-source based infrastructure for multicentric clinical data mining. Radiother Oncol. 2014 Feb;110(2):370-374. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09-03-023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
6050
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.