Center-based Physical Therapy and Home-based Physical Therapy After Platelet Rich Plasm Injection

NCT ID: NCT05033977

Last Updated: 2021-09-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2020-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a chronic disease characterized by pain, reduced range of motion, instability and effusion in the joint. Moreover, no study has investigated the effect of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) in comparison with that of a placebo injection in the same patient with bilateral knee OA. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of supervised physiotherapy and home exercises after PRP injection in patients with knee OA. The investigator hypothesized that the supervised physiotherapy program would be more effective in decreasing pain and improving muscle strength, physical function, and quality of life than home exercises following PRP injection in patients with knee OA. A total of 30 patients with complete follow-up to 6 weeks post-intervention; 17 patients randomized to the supervised exercise group and 13 patients randomized to the home exercise group. Subjects were recruited from who had radiographic evidence (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade II-III) of knee OA and ranged from 45 to 70 years of age. Measurements including pain during rest and activity, muscle strength assessment, self-estimated functions of the affected knee and functional performance tests for lower extremity strength were performed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A total of 30 patients with complete follow-up to 6 weeks post-intervention; 17 patients randomized to the supervised exercise group and 13 patients randomized to the home exercise group. Subjects were recruited from who had radiographic evidence (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade II-III) of knee OA and ranged from 45 to 70 years of age. Measurements including pain during rest and activity, muscle strength assessment, self-estimated functions of the affected knee and functional performance tests for lower extremity strength were performed.

Pain Measurement Visual Analog Scale was used to assess the subjects' pain during rest and activity. A 10 cm line was driven and subjects was wanted to mark the point (0; no pain, 10; worst imaginable pain) as representing the pain during rest and activity.

Muscle Strength Measurement Quadriceps, hamstring muscles and the hip stability isometric test (HipSIT) strength were measured with a hand-held digital dynamometer. Each subject was verbally informed before the test in order to ensure correct movement and subjects were asked to perform submaximal contraction against the evaluator's hand before testing. ''Break test'' technique was performed for the strength measurement. According to this technique, the evaluator gradually overcomes the muscle strength and stops when the joint gives way. The quadriceps muscle strength was measured in a sitting position (Hip 90° flexion, knee extended) with hands crossed across the chest. The hand-held dynamometer was positioned on the anterior surface of the lower leg proximal to the ankle during test. Hamstring muscle group measurement was carried out on prone position (Hip neutral position, knee flexion 90°). The hand-held dynamometer was positioned on the posterior surface of the lower leg proximal to the ankle during test. The HipSIT evaluates the abductor, external rotator and extensor muscles of the hip together. This test was performed in a side-lying position (Hips 45° flexion, knees 90° flexion, heels in contact with the limb tested superior to opposing limb as 20° abduction). The hand-held dynamometer was placed on laterally positioned 5 cm above the knee joint interline during test. Each measurement for each muscle was performed 3 times at 30 sec intervals and the higher value was recorded. There was also a minute interval between muscle groups measurements.

Functional Status The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index is a disease specific self-administered test for OA to assess functions of the affected joints. It consists of 24 questions (three subscale; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions) and daily activities (17 questions).

Interventions Each subject was informed about knee OA and daily activities that negatively affect the knee OA. They were also asked to use cold press 3 times (10-15 min) a day for 6 weeks. Supervised physiotherapy group performed exercises 3 times a week for 6 weeks under supervision of a physiotherapist after the first evaluation. The subjects in home exercise group were taught exercises and they were informed to do exercises 3 times a week for 6 weeks. Home exercise group was telephoned to motivate them to do exercise or to find out if they have any problem about the exercises once a week for 6 weeks. The exercise programs for each group consisted of these parts: warm up, strengthening, balance and cool down period. The standard exercises were performed by all of the subjects in each group in order to standardize the exercise procedure. We used OMNI Resistance Exercise Scale for perceived effort to standardize elastic-band (Thera-Band; The Hygenic Corporation, Akron, OH) resistance among subjects. Subjects were asked to do 3 repetitions for each exercise starting with lowest resistance elastic band, and the resistance of the elastic band was increased until it reached 5 on the 11-point scale to determine the appropriate elastic band. Second measurements were performed at the end of 6 weeks, the day of routine doctor control for PRP injection. All assessments were performed by the same physiotherapist.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

supervised exercise group home exercise group
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Center-based Exercise

patients did exercises with a physical therapist in a clinic 3 days and 45 minute in a week for 6 weeks.

The exercise programe included strenghtening and streching exercises. Strenghtening exercises for lower extremity and streching exercises for hamstrings.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise (center-based)

Intervention Type OTHER

Exercise therapy with a physical therapist in a clinic.

Home-based exercise

Patients did exercises at home every day and 3 times per day. The exercise programe included strenghtening and streching exercises. Strenghtening exercises for lower extremity and streching exercises for hamstrings.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise (home-based)

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients did exercises at home every day and 3 times per day.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exercise (center-based)

Exercise therapy with a physical therapist in a clinic.

Intervention Type OTHER

Exercise (home-based)

Patients did exercises at home every day and 3 times per day.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with knee osteoarthritis
* Patients with PRP injections

Exclusion Criteria

* have any neurologic disease
* have any oncologic disease
* have any other intraarticular injection last 6 months
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hacettepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

HANDE GUNEY

Assoc, Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hande Güney Deniz, Assoc.,Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hacettepe University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hacettepe University

Ankara, Samanpazari, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GO 2021/049

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.