Closed-loop FiO2 Controller During High Flow Oxygen Treatment In Pediatric Patients (COFICOHFOT)

NCT ID: NCT05032365

Last Updated: 2023-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-01

Study Completion Date

2022-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Recently, high flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) is becoming more popular in the treatment of any kind of respiratory failure. Pediatric mechanical ventilation consensus conference (PEMVECC) guidelines suggest measuring oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) in all ventilated children and furthermore to measure partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) in moderate-to-severe disease in order to prevent excessive use of oxygen while preventing hypoxemia and hyperoxemia. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of a closed-loop FiO2 controller (CLOC) with conventional control of FiO2 during HFOT of pediatric patients in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The hypothesis of this study is: Close-loop FiO2 controller increases the time spent within clinically targeted SpO2 ranges and decreases the time spent outside clinical target SpO2 ranges as compared to manual oxygen control in PICU patients treated with HFOT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Close-loop FiO2 Controller

Two hours period where the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) delivered will be automatically titrated based on SpO2 values obtained from the patient.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Close-loop FiO2 controller

Intervention Type DEVICE

Close-loop FiO2 controller software option provides automated adjustment of the ventilator Oxygen setting to maintain the patient's SpO2 in a defined target range. When using the software option, the user defines the SpO2 target range, as well as the SpO2 emergency limits, and the device adjusts the FiO2 setting to keep the patient's SpO2 in the target range.

Conventional

Two hours period where the FiO2 delivered will be conventionally adjusted by the healthcare personnel based on SpO2 values obtained from the patient.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional FiO2 adjustment by the clinician according to SpO2 values

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Close-loop FiO2 controller

Close-loop FiO2 controller software option provides automated adjustment of the ventilator Oxygen setting to maintain the patient's SpO2 in a defined target range. When using the software option, the user defines the SpO2 target range, as well as the SpO2 emergency limits, and the device adjusts the FiO2 setting to keep the patient's SpO2 in the target range.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional

Conventional FiO2 adjustment by the clinician according to SpO2 values

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pediatric patients older than 1 month and younger than18 years of age; hospitalized at the PICU with the intention of treatment with HFOT at least for the upcoming 5 hours
* Requiring FiO2 ≥ 25% to keep SpO2 in the target ranges defined by the clinician
* Written informed consent signed and dated by the patient or one relative in case that the patient is unable to consent, after full explanation of the study by the investigator and prior to study participation

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient with indication for immediate noninvasive ventilation (NIMV), or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)
* Hemodynamic instability defined as a need of continuous infusion of epinephrine or norepinephrine \> 1 mg/h
* Low quality on the SpO2 measurement using finger and ear sensor (quality index below 60% on the SpO2 sensor, which is displayed by a red or orange colour bar)
* Severe acidosis (pH ≤ 7.25)
* Pregnant woman
* Patients deemed at high risk for the need of mechanical ventilation within the next 5 hours
* Patients deemed at high risk for the need of transportation from PICU to another ward, diagnostic unit or any other hospital
* Diseases or conditions which may affect transcutaneous SpO2 measurement such as chronic or acute dyshemoglobinemia: methemoglobinemia, carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning, sickle cell disease
* Formalized ethical decision to withhold or withdraw life support
* Patient included in another interventional research study under consent
* Patient already enrolled in the present study in a previous episode of acute respiratory failure
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hasan ağın

Professor doctor, Head of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erzurum Regional Research and Training Hospital

Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

The Health Sciences University Izmir Behçet Uz Child Health and Diseases Research and Training Hospital

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kneyber MCJ, de Luca D, Calderini E, Jarreau PH, Javouhey E, Lopez-Herce J, Hammer J, Macrae D, Markhorst DG, Medina A, Pons-Odena M, Racca F, Wolf G, Biban P, Brierley J, Rimensberger PC; section Respiratory Failure of the European Society for Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care. Recommendations for mechanical ventilation of critically ill children from the Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation Consensus Conference (PEMVECC). Intensive Care Med. 2017 Dec;43(12):1764-1780. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4920-z. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28936698 (View on PubMed)

Mitra S, Singh B, El-Naggar W, McMillan DD. Automated versus manual control of inspired oxygen to target oxygen saturation in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Perinatol. 2018 Apr;38(4):351-360. doi: 10.1038/s41372-017-0037-z. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29296004 (View on PubMed)

Reynolds PR, Miller TL, Volakis LI, Holland N, Dungan GC, Roehr CC, Ives K. Randomised cross-over study of automated oxygen control for preterm infants receiving nasal high flow. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jul;104(4):F366-F371. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315342. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30464005 (View on PubMed)

van Kaam AH, Hummler HD, Wilinska M, Swietlinski J, Lal MK, te Pas AB, Lista G, Gupta S, Fajardo CA, Onland W, Waitz M, Warakomska M, Cavigioli F, Bancalari E, Claure N, Bachman TE. Automated versus Manual Oxygen Control with Different Saturation Targets and Modes of Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants. J Pediatr. 2015 Sep;167(3):545-50.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26144575 (View on PubMed)

Lui K, Jones LJ, Foster JP, Davis PG, Ching SK, Oei JL, Osborn DA. Lower versus higher oxygen concentrations titrated to target oxygen saturations during resuscitation of preterm infants at birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 4;5(5):CD010239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010239.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29726010 (View on PubMed)

Maiwald CA, Niemarkt HJ, Poets CF, Urschitz MS, Konig J, Hummler H, Bassler D, Engel C, Franz AR; FiO2-C Study Group. Effects of closed-loop automatic control of the inspiratory fraction of oxygen (FiO2-C) on outcome of extremely preterm infants - study protocol of a randomized controlled parallel group multicenter trial for safety and efficacy. BMC Pediatr. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1735-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31630690 (View on PubMed)

Sandal O, Ceylan G, Topal S, Hepduman P, Colak M, Novotni D, Soydan E, Karaarslan U, Atakul G, Schultz MJ, Agin H. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygenation in pediatric patients under high-flow nasal oxygen-A randomized crossover study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 16;9:1046902. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1046902. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36465920 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

604/2021/13-01/

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

High Flow Nasal Cannula Rates in Pediatric Asthma
NCT06379607 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
POM vs HFNC for Hypoxemia Prevention in Children
NCT07234188 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA