Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
656 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-07
2021-07-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Arm 1: Participants experienced a default version of NUSMart which replicated the traditional shopping experience of online grocery stores with no FOP labels (Control).
Arm 2: Same as Arm 1 NUSMart except that Chilean warning FOP labels were displayed on less healthy food and beverages. Products with specific nutrients (i.e. sugar, sodium, saturated fat, energy) falling outside the bounds of the thresholds defined by the Chilean warning labels were depicted with the warning labels on them.
Arm 3: Same as Arm 1 NUSMart except that Nutri-Score FOP labels along with % sugar per serving were displayed on all food and beverages. These labels score products on the basis of 7 nutrients (calories, saturated fats, sugar, salt, fibre, protein and percentage of fruits, vegetables and nuts) from A to E (best to worst). To ensure that participants understood what Nutri-Score labels mean and how they work, an introductory video was shown before shopping.
The investigators hypothesize the following:
Hypothesis 1: Diet quality, as measured by weighted average Nutri-Score point of shoppers' final baskets, will be greatest in Arm 3, followed by Arm 2, followed by Control.
Hypothesis 2: Grams of sugar per serving/ milligrams of sodium per serving/ grams of saturated fat per serving/ calories per serving will be least in Arm 2, followed by Arm 3, followed by Control.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Understanding Food Choices in Bahrain Using Bahrain e-Mart
NCT06440421
Understanding Food Choices
NCT04632212
Impact of Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions
NCT02385838
Development of Online Store for Testing Regulatory Food and Nutrition Policies in Brazil
NCT05789238
Decoding the Interplay of Front-of-Pack Labels, Price, and Consumer Perceptions: Impact on Food Choices in Korea and Singapore
NCT07186270
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study is to use a 3-arm randomized controlled trial with an online grocery store (NUSMart), to rigorously evaluate the effect of the two FOP labels, Chilean warning labels and Nutri-Score, on diet quality.
1. Food labels
The investigators tested 2 different types of food labels in this study. They are as follows:
1. Chilean Warning Labels: These labels were implemented in Chile in 2016. They are shown on those less-healthy food and beverage products that don't fall within thresholds that are defined for the following nutrients: sugar, sodium, calories and saturated fats. The original labels are in Spanish but the ones that the investigators displayed were in Arabic.
2. Nutri-Score Labels: These labels were implemented by the French government in 2017. They are shown on all food and beverage products and range from A to E with the corresponding colours moving from Green to Red (symbolizing best to worst). The scores and grades are calculated based on 7 different nutrients grouped into 2 categories i.e. nutrients to consume (such as fibre) and nutrients to avoid (such as sugar). The investigators modified the labels by adding % sugar per serving on the right side of the labels.
2. Overview of RCT Design
To test these labels, the investigators used three different versions of NUSMart. Each participant was randomly assigned to one of the following arms and asked to complete a one-time hypothetical shop.
Arm 1: Control arm. Participants experienced an unmodified version of NUSMart, which replicates the traditional shopping experience of online grocery stores.
Arm 2: Similar to Arm 1 except that products were labeled with Chilean warning FOP labels.
Arm 3: Similar to Arm 1 except that products were labeled with NutriScore FOP labels.
To minimize hypothetical shopping biases, the investigators set a minimum spending value per person per week and adjusted the total minimum spending value depending on household size.
3. Subject related procedures
As the investigators have done in prior studies, participants were recruited if they were KSA residents aged 18 years or older, could speak Arabic and were primary weekly shoppers for their households. Recruitment was done using a Saudi Arabia based web panelist.
On recruitment, they were asked to fill in a baseline questionnaire to collect demographic and health characteristics, which took approximately 10-15 minutes to complete.
The baseline questionnaire includes a question as to whether any household members have a medical condition, such as diabetes or hypertension, which requires limiting the types of foods they eat. The investigators asked this question to allow for testing whether the interventions differentially influence these households, with the expectation that households with less healthy patients may obtain greater benefits from purchasing baskets with higher mean Nutri-Scores. Since the objective of this RCT is to quantify the effectiveness of the interventions on diet quality, a precursor to NCDs, the collection of household health indicators is reasonable.
Upon completion of the baseline survey, participants were randomly assigned to one of the 3 shopping conditions (Arm 1 \[Control\], Arm 2, or Arm 3). They logged into the NUSMart website and were asked to purchase their weekly groceries with a minimum spend per person per week (the total minimum spending value depends on the household size). Each participant therefore shopped only once during the study in one of the arms (1,2 or 3) which was randomly assigned to them.
Participants were given explicit instructions to purchase groceries for the purposes of breakfast, lunch, dinner, snacks and beverage consumption for one week keeping in mind that they would not be consuming any meals outside. The stores were set up such that participants were not allowed to check out with their cart unless they selected items from at least 4 different NUSMart categories. This ensures that participants shop as though they are shopping for their own consumption i.e. to minimize hypothetical biases.
A post-study survey was conducted after the last shop to collect participant opinions on the labels and understand their impact better.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Arm (Arm 1)
Participants will experience an unmodified version of NUSMart, which replicates the traditional shopping experience of online grocery stores.
No interventions assigned to this group
Warning Label Arm (Arm 2)
Similar to Arm 1 except that products are labeled with Chilean warning FOP labels.
Chilean Warning Labels
These labels were implemented in Chile in 2016. They are shown on those less-healthy food and beverage products that do not fall within thresholds that are defined for the following nutrients: sugar, sodium, calories and saturated fats. The original labels are in Spanish but the ones that we displayed were in Arabic.
Nutri-Score Arm (Arm 3)
Similar to Arm 1 except that products are labeled with NutriScore FOP labels.
Nutri-Score Labels
These labels were implemented by the French government in 2017. They are shown on all food and beverage products and range from A to E with the corresponding colours moving from Green to Red (symbolizing best to worst). The scores and grades are calculated based on 7 different nutrients grouped into 2 categories i.e. nutrients to consume (such as fibre) and nutrients to avoid (such as sugar). We modified the labels by adding % sugar per serving on the right side of the labels.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Chilean Warning Labels
These labels were implemented in Chile in 2016. They are shown on those less-healthy food and beverage products that do not fall within thresholds that are defined for the following nutrients: sugar, sodium, calories and saturated fats. The original labels are in Spanish but the ones that we displayed were in Arabic.
Nutri-Score Labels
These labels were implemented by the French government in 2017. They are shown on all food and beverage products and range from A to E with the corresponding colours moving from Green to Red (symbolizing best to worst). The scores and grades are calculated based on 7 different nutrients grouped into 2 categories i.e. nutrients to consume (such as fibre) and nutrients to avoid (such as sugar). We modified the labels by adding % sugar per serving on the right side of the labels.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age of 18 and above,
* Arabic speakers, and
* A weekly primary grocery shopper for their households can participate in this study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Under 18 years of age,
* Cannot speak Arabic, or
* Are not weekly primary grocery shoppers for their households cannot participate in this study.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
World Bank
OTHER
Public Health Authority of Saudi Arabia
UNKNOWN
Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eric A. Finkelstein
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eric A Finkelstein, PhD MHA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
7197919
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.