Opioid vs. Benzodiazepine-based Sedation for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Internal Medicine Ward
NCT ID: NCT04983615
Last Updated: 2025-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-01
2024-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In most Western European countries, as well as in the United States, there are almost no mechanically ventilated patients hospitalized outside the intensive care unit. In a few countries, including Japan and Israel, mechanically ventilated patients are also hospitalized outside of intensive care units, as part of internal or surgical wards. Contrary to the vast knowledge accumulated regarding different sedation methods in ventilated patients in intensive care units, there are almost no studies that have evaluated different sedation methods in ventilated patients hospitalized in non-intensive care wards. Thus, while there is consensus on the benefits of opioid-based sedation in intensive care units, there is insufficient information to recommend the preferred sedation method in non-ICU wards.
For various reasons, in a large number of the internal medicine wards of hospitals in Israel, the common sedation practice for ventilated patients is still benzodiazepine-based sedation. In the past year, a pilot program was initiated in Internal Medicine Department A at Meir Hospital in Kfar Saba, in which a new protocol for opioid-based sedation in ventilated patients was implemented.
The protocol is based on the continuous intravenous infusion of fentanyl as the first line of treatment for sedation in ventilated patients only. If the sedation-agitation level (as measured by the RASS score) did not match the target RASS score set by the attending physician, a dose up to a maximum limit could be increased according to the protocol. Second-line sedation drugs were addition of continuous intravenous infusion of midazolam (in addition to fentanyl) in hemodynamically stable patients, or addition of continuous intravenous infusion of ketamine in unstable patients. In stable patients who did not reach the desired RASS level under continuous infusion of fentanyl and midazolam, ketamine could be added as a third line drug, in addition to fentanyl and midazolam.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Continuous Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
NCT00479661
Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for Continuous Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
NCT00481312
Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: Midazolam Versus Dexmedetomidine
NCT01256866
The Psychological Effects of Different Sedation Protocol on Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adults.
NCT02123589
The Effect of Analgesia Based Sedation Protocol on Brain Function of Critical Care Patients
NCT02078583
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
fentanyl-based sedation group
fentanyl-based sedation
fentanyl-based sedation instead of midazolam-based sedation in ventilated patients
midazolam-based sedation group
midazolam-based sedation
midazolam-based sedation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
fentanyl-based sedation
fentanyl-based sedation instead of midazolam-based sedation in ventilated patients
midazolam-based sedation
midazolam-based sedation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Meir Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
sara dichtwald
Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sara Dichtwald, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Meir Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Meir medical center Kfar Saba
Kfar Saba, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0114-21-MMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.