MENDS Study: Trial in Ventilated ICU Patients Comparing an Alpha2 Agonist Versus a Gamma Aminobutyric Acid (GABA)-Agonist to Determine Delirium Rates, Efficacy of Sedation, Analgesia and Discharge Cognitive Status
NCT ID: NCT00095251
Last Updated: 2018-09-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-08-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The MENDS2 Study, Maximizing the Efficacy of Sedation and Reducing Neurological Dysfunction and Mortality in Septic Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT01739933
How Your Patients' Non-REM Sleep Changes On Sedatives in the Intensive Care Units
NCT00826553
Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine for Delirium Prevention in Mechanically Ventilated Septic Patients
NCT04876937
Randomized Controlled Trial of Dexmedetomidine for the Treatment of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Delirium
NCT00351299
Minimizing ICU Neurological Dysfunction With Dexmedetomidine-induced Sleep
NCT02856594
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Long-term objective: To standardize and compare different strategies of sedation and analgesia for ventilated ICU patients in order to optimize their clinical outcomes focusing on delirium and the long-term neuropsychological dysfunction of ICU survivors.
Specific Aims:
* to study prevalence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients using differential exposure to alpha2 vs. GABA receptor agonists while evaluating efficacy of sedation and analgesia;
* to compare clinical outcomes including duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay and severity of neuropsychological dysfunction at hospital discharge; and
* to develop pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models for dexmedetomidine and lorazepam when used for up to 5 days in ICU patients.
Relationship to anesthesiology: We will study whether the adverse clinical outcomes associated with ICU delirium including long-term neuropsychological dysfunction can be modified by the choice of psychoactive agents frequently used by anesthesiologists and intensivists.
Design: A blinded, randomized controlled trial of adult mechanically ventilated patients using a sedation strategy of dexmedetomidine ± fentanyl versus lorazepam ± fentanyl, with relevant outcomes and safety monitoring.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dexmedetomidine group
Patients in the dexmedetomidine arm will receive a bolus dose of 1 μg/kg infused over 10 minutes followed by an infusion started at 0.15- 0.45 μg/kg/hr. The patient's managing physician will have the option of beginning the dexmedetomidine infusion without a bolus in circumstances where the patient's sedation level is adequate at enrollment or in the presence of baseline bradycardia /hypotension. Dexmedetomidine will be titrated every 10 minutes to achieve set target RASS score. The maximum dexmedetomidine infusion will be 1.5 μg/kg/hr.
Dexmedetomidine
a bolus dose of 1 μg/kg infused over 10 minutes followed by an infusion started at 0.15- 0.45 μg/kg/hr. Dexmedetomidine will be titrated every 10 minutes to achieve set target RASS score. The maximum dexmedetomidine infusion will be 1.5 μg/kg/hr.
Lorazepam group
Patients in the lorazepam arm will receive a bolus dose of 1-3 mg followed by an infusion started at 1-3 mg/hr. Lorazepam infusion will be titrated every 10 minutes to achieve set target RASS score. The maximum lorazepam infusion will be 10 mg /hr.
Lorazepam
Patients in the lorazepam arm will receive a bolus dose of 1-3 mg followed by an infusion started at 1-3 mg/hr. Lorazepam infusion will be titrated every 10 minutes to achieve set target RASS score. The maximum lorazepam infusion will be 10 mg /hr.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine
a bolus dose of 1 μg/kg infused over 10 minutes followed by an infusion started at 0.15- 0.45 μg/kg/hr. Dexmedetomidine will be titrated every 10 minutes to achieve set target RASS score. The maximum dexmedetomidine infusion will be 1.5 μg/kg/hr.
Lorazepam
Patients in the lorazepam arm will receive a bolus dose of 1-3 mg followed by an infusion started at 1-3 mg/hr. Lorazepam infusion will be titrated every 10 minutes to achieve set target RASS score. The maximum lorazepam infusion will be 10 mg /hr.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects who are pregnant (a pregnancy test will be performed on all women of child bearing age)
* Inability to obtain informed consent from the patient or his/her surrogate
* Subjects in the ICU due to a lack of beds elsewhere in the hospital, triage issues, or withdrawal of care decisions rather than severity of illness
* Subjects admitted with alcohol or drug overdoses, suicide attempts, or alcohol/delirium tremens
* Subjects who are physiologically benzodiazepine dependent, and at risk for withdrawal syndromes
* Subjects with chronic pain syndromes on maintenance narcotics
* Subjects treated within the last 30 days with a drug or device that has not received regulatory approval as of study entry
* Subjects with a psychiatric history for which they are on neuroleptic treatment
* Subjects with documented moderate to severe dementia
* Subjects with anoxic brain injuries, strokes, neurotrauma, or neuromuscular disorders such as myasthenia gravis or Guillain Barre syndrome
* Medical team following patient unwilling to use the sedation regimens
* Subjects whose family and/or physician have not committed to aggressive support for 72 hours or who are likely to withdraw within 72 hours
* Subjects who are moribund and not expected to survive 24 hours
* Subjects not expected to survive hospital discharge due to preexisting uncorrectable medical condition
* Documented allergy to study medications
* Subjects who have either Child-Pugh Class B or C cirrhosis
* Subjects with active coronary artery disease at time of screening as defined by any recent evidence of ischemia, documented myocardial infarction, or coronary intervention within the past 6 months.
* Subjects with advanced heart block at time of screening
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wes Ely
Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
E Wesley Ely, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, Speroff T, Gordon SM, Harrell FE Jr, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Dittus RS. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1753-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1753.
Milbrandt EB, Deppen S, Harrison PL, Shintani AK, Speroff T, Stiles RA, Truman B, Bernard GR, Dittus RS, Ely EW. Costs associated with delirium in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 2004 Apr;32(4):955-62. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000119429.16055.92.
Ely EW, Gautam S, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Speroff T, Truman B, Dittus R, Bernard R, Inouye SK. The impact of delirium in the intensive care unit on hospital length of stay. Intensive Care Med. 2001 Dec;27(12):1892-900. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1132-2. Epub 2001 Nov 8.
Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Gordon S, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Hart RP, Dittus R. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA. 2001 Dec 5;286(21):2703-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.21.2703.
Inouye SK, Schlesinger MJ, Lydon TJ. Delirium: a symptom of how hospital care is failing older persons and a window to improve quality of hospital care. Am J Med. 1999 May;106(5):565-73. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00070-4.
Inouye SK, Rushing JT, Foreman MD, Palmer RM, Pompei P. Does delirium contribute to poor hospital outcomes? A three-site epidemiologic study. J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Apr;13(4):234-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00073.x.
Ostermann ME, Keenan SP, Seiferling RA, Sibbald WJ. Sedation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. JAMA. 2000 Mar 15;283(11):1451-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.11.1451.
Marcantonio ER, Juarez G, Goldman L, Mangione CM, Ludwig LE, Lind L, Katz N, Cook EF, Orav EJ, Lee TH. The relationship of postoperative delirium with psychoactive medications. JAMA. 1994 Nov 16;272(19):1518-22.
Dubois MJ, Bergeron N, Dumont M, Dial S, Skrobik Y. Delirium in an intensive care unit: a study of risk factors. Intensive Care Med. 2001 Aug;27(8):1297-304. doi: 10.1007/s001340101017.
Maze M, Scarfini C, Cavaliere F. New agents for sedation in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2001 Oct;17(4):881-97. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70185-8.
National Research Council (US) Committee on Future Directions for Cognitive Research on Aging; Stern PC, Carstensen LL, editors. The Aging Mind: Opportunities in Cognitive Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44833/
Maldonado J, Wysong A, Starre Pvd, Block T. Postoperative Sedation and the Incidence of ICU Delirium in Cardiac Surgery Patients. ASA. 2004;Abstract and Poster Presentation.
Stollings JL, Thompson JL, Ferrell BA, Scheinin M, Wilkinson GR, Hughes CG, Shintani AK, Ely EW, Girard TD, Pandharipande PP, Patel MB. Sedative Plasma Concentrations and Delirium Risk in Critical Illness. Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Jun;52(6):513-521. doi: 10.1177/1060028017753480. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
Pandharipande PP, Sanders RD, Girard TD, McGrane S, Thompson JL, Shintani AK, Herr DL, Maze M, Ely EW; MENDS investigators. Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R38. doi: 10.1186/cc8916. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Herr DL, Maze M, Girard TD, Miller RR, Shintani AK, Thompson JL, Jackson JC, Deppen SA, Stiles RA, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW. Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007 Dec 12;298(22):2644-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2644.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
This is an educational website on delirium in the ICU.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB#031089
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.