Comparison of Darbepoetin Alpha and Recombinant Human Erythropoietin for Treatment of Anemia in Children With Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT ID: NCT04959578
Last Updated: 2021-07-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-01
2019-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Darbepoetin Treatment of Anemia in Children With Chronic Renal Failure
NCT00213291
Study to Assess Darbepoetin Alfa Dosing for the Correction of Anemia in Pediatric Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT00436748
Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Pre-dialysis Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease on Darbepoetin Treatment Versus BAY85-3934
NCT02021409
Efficacy & Safety Study of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin -Alpha, in Patients With Anemia of Chronic Renal Failure
NCT00399269
A Study of MK2578 in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Who Are Not on Dialysis (2578-002)
NCT00968617
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To demonstrate that Darbepoetin alpha is non-inferior to erythropoietin for the treatment of anemia in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 (on or not on dialysis).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
To determine the safety and tolerability of Darbepoetin alpha in the treatment of anemia in the pediatric population with CKD stage 3-5.
STUDY DESIGN:
An open-label, randomized, non-inferiority study of darbepoetin alpha (DA) and recombinant human erythropoietin(rHuEpo) for the treatment of anemia in children with chronic kidney disease stages 3 to 5 (on or not on dialysis)
DURATION OF STUDY:
The study was conducted over a period of 1 year (from 1st February 2018 to 31st January 2019).
STUDY SETTING:
This study was conducted in the Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Paediatrics, Institute of Child Health, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
CONSENT:
A prior written informed consent was obtained from parents/ legal guardians of eligible children for participation in the study.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION:
The primary objective of the study is to assess the non-inferiority of darbepoetin alfa compared with rHuEpo. Using a previous study with similar protocol \[1\], considering darbepoetin alfa and rHuEpo as equipotent, we accepted a type I error of 0.05 and a type II error of 0.80 for detecting a true difference. A 1.0 or greater difference in mean change in Hb variable between two groups was considered clinically significant. An estimate of standard deviation in dependent variables was assumed as 1.5. As a result, we have calculated that minimum of 28 patients are needed in each group (total-56) in order to obtain 5% type 1 error and a 80% power of detecting a difference of 1.0 or more. However, due to time constraints a sample of minimum 15 subjects in each group was planned.
Note: Sample size estimation was done by powerandsamplesize.com.
METHODOLOGY:
The study was conducted in the following phases:
1. Screening Phase (Visit 1, Day -14 to Day -1) The potential subjects were screened as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria only after obtaining written informed consent from the parent/subject.
2. Enrollment and Randomization Phase (Visit 2, Day 0)
Subjects were randomized in two groups in a 1:1 ratio by computer generated mechanism (graphpad.com) as follows:
1. Treatment arm 1: Erythropoietin
2. Treatment arm 2: Darbepoetin alfa
3. Treatment Phase (Visit 3, Day 1 to Visit 8, Day 168) Patients received respective treatments for 24 week period and they were followed up every 4 weeks. Both rHuEpo and darbepoetin alfa were titrated over the first 23 weeks of the study to maintain the subjects' Hb levels between 11 to 12 g/dl without adjusting the dosing frequency. Route of administration was subcutaneous. Efficacy was determined between weeks 24 and 28.
ETHICS APPROVAL The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Erythropoietin
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin
Recombinant human erythropoietin
Dose, route and schedule was kept same as previous erythropoietin dose at randomization; adjusted as necessary (+/- 25% of the starting dose) to maintain Hb within 11 - 12 g/dL.
Darbepoetin alfa
Darbepoetin Alpha
Darbepoetin Alfa
Dose conversion (100U erythropoietin = 0.42 mcg darbeopoetin). DA dose was kept once weekly (QW) if previously receiving rHuEpo ≥2 times a week, or Q2W if previously receiving rHuEpo \<2 times a week. Dose was adjusted as necessary (+/- 25% of the starting dose) to maintain Hb within 11 - 12 g/dL.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Recombinant human erythropoietin
Dose, route and schedule was kept same as previous erythropoietin dose at randomization; adjusted as necessary (+/- 25% of the starting dose) to maintain Hb within 11 - 12 g/dL.
Darbepoetin Alfa
Dose conversion (100U erythropoietin = 0.42 mcg darbeopoetin). DA dose was kept once weekly (QW) if previously receiving rHuEpo ≥2 times a week, or Q2W if previously receiving rHuEpo \<2 times a week. Dose was adjusted as necessary (+/- 25% of the starting dose) to maintain Hb within 11 - 12 g/dL.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. CKD patients stages 3 to 5 (on or not on dialysis).
3. Baseline hemoglobin 9 - 12 g/dL.
4. Subject should have adequate transferrin saturation (≥20%) and serum ferritin (≥100 ng/mL).
5. Stable erythropoietin therapy for 8 weeks ( defined as a ≤25% change in prescribed dose, no change in the route of administration and no more than one missed or withheld dose).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject with uncontrolled hypertension.
3. HIV positive patient.
4. The patient with known hematologic disease or cause of anemia other than renal disease.
5. Patient with a history of seizure disorder or received antiepileptic medication for a seizure disorder within 6 months prior to enrolment.
6. Hyperparathyroidism (Intact parathyroid hormone more than 1500 pg/ml or biopsy proven marrow fibrosis).
7. Major surgery within 12 weeks.
8. Active inflammatory disease within 8 weeks of randomization requiring immunosuppressive therapy.
9. Clinical evidence of malignancy.
10. Blood transfusion within 8 weeks prior to initiation of therapy.
1 Year
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rufaida Mazahir
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rufaida Mazahir
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rufaida Mazahir, MD, FNB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Warady BA, Arar MY, Lerner G, Nakanishi AM, Stehman-Breen C. Darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2006 Aug;21(8):1144-52. doi: 10.1007/s00467-006-0071-0. Epub 2006 May 25.
Koshy SM, Geary DF. Anemia in children with chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008 Feb;23(2):209-19. doi: 10.1007/s00467-006-0381-2. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
Klang B, Bjorvell H, Clyne N. Quality of life in predialytic uremic patients. Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):109-16. doi: 10.1007/BF00435975.
Gerson A, Hwang W, Fiorenza J, Barth K, Kaskel F, Weiss L, Zelikovsky N, Fivush B, Furth S. Anemia and health-related quality of life in adolescents with chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Dec;44(6):1017-23. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.08.024.
Mitsnefes MM, Daniels SR, Schwartz SM, Meyer RA, Khoury P, Strife CF. Severe left ventricular hypertrophy in pediatric dialysis: prevalence and predictors. Pediatr Nephrol. 2000 Sep;14(10-11):898-902. doi: 10.1007/s004670000303.
Chavers BM, Herzog CA. The spectrum of cardiovascular disease in children with predialysis chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2004 Jul;11(3):319-27. doi: 10.1053/j.arrt.2004.04.002.
Pickett JL, Theberge DC, Brown WS, Schweitzer SU, Nissenson AR. Normalizing hematocrit in dialysis patients improves brain function. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999 Jun;33(6):1122-30. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(99)70150-2.
Pattaragarn A, Warady BA, Sabath RJ. Exercise capacity in pediatric patients with end-stage renal disease. Perit Dial Int. 2004 May-Jun;24(3):274-80.
Sietsema KE, Hiatt WR, Esler A, Adler S, Amato A, Brass EP. Clinical and demographic predictors of exercise capacity in end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Jan;39(1):76-85. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.29884.
Xia H, Ebben J, Ma JZ, Collins AJ. Hematocrit levels and hospitalization risks in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 Jun;10(6):1309-16. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1061309.
Ma JZ, Ebben J, Xia H, Collins AJ. Hematocrit level and associated mortality in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 Mar;10(3):610-9. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V103610.
Warady BA, Ho M. Morbidity and mortality in children with anemia at initiation of dialysis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003 Oct;18(10):1055-62. doi: 10.1007/s00467-003-1214-1. Epub 2003 Jul 23.
VanDeVoorde RG, Warady BA. Management of chronic kidney disease. In: Avner ED, Harmon WE, Niaudet P, Yoshikawa N (eds). Pediatric Nephrology, 6th edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009; 1661-92.
Lerner G, Kale AS, Warady BA, Jabs K, Bunchman TE, Heatherington A, Olson K, Messer-Mann L, Maroni BJ. Pharmacokinetics of darbepoetin alfa in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2002 Nov;17(11):933-7. doi: 10.1007/s00467-002-0932-0. Epub 2002 Sep 14.
Mazahir R, Anand K, Pruthi PK. Comparison of darbepoetin alpha and recombinant human erythropoietin for treatment of anemia in pediatric chronic kidney disease: a non-inferiority trial from India. Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jan;182(1):101-109. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04650-1. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EC/01/18/1317
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.