Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hypertensive Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage by Transfrontal Keyhole Neuroendoscopy

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-01

Study Completion Date

2023-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the prognosis of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage treated by two different surgical methods, and to clarify the therapeutic effect of minimally invasive surgery, so as to find a better surgical method that can reduce surgical trauma and mortality and improve the prognosis of patients

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Acute Hypertensive Cerebral Hemmorrhage Surgery

NCT04957849

Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage

UNKNOWN NA

Efficacy and Safety of NeuroEndoscopic Surgery for IntraCerebral Hemorrhage

NCT05539859

Intracerebral Hemorrhage Basal Ganglia

RECRUITING NA

Minimally-invasive Surgery Versus Craniotomy in Patients With Supratentorial Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage

NCT02811614

Intracranial Hemorrhage, Hypertensive

COMPLETED NA

Prognostic Analysis of Different Treatment Options for Cerebral Hemorrhage

NCT05548530

Brain Hemorrhage

RECRUITING

Comparison Between Stereotactic Aspiration and Intra-endoscopic Surgery to Treat Intracerebral Hemorrhage

NCT02515903

Intracerebral Hemorrhage Surgery

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, a cohort observation method was adopted to observe a total of 52 patients who underwent two surgical procedures, namely, removal of hematoma in basal ganglo-region by keyhole neuroendoscopy under frontal ultrasound guidance and removal of hematoma by craniotomy microsurgery. They were divided into the endoscopic surgery group and the microsurgery group. In the endoscopic surgery group, 26 patients underwent removal of hematoma in basal ganglo-region by keyhole neuroendoscopy under frontal ultrasound guidance.In the microsurgery group, 26 cases were treated with craniotomy microsurgery for hematoma removal. The clearance rate of surgical hematoma, surgical safety, GCS score, GOS score, nerve fiber injury and postoperative complications were observed in the two groups 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after surgery.To observe and analyze whether endoscopic surgery group has advantages in improving hematoma clearance rate and efficacy

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endoscopic Surgery Group

After a full evaluation of the patient's condition, the informed consent was signed to perform keyhole neuroendoscopic ultrasound-guided hematoma removal for the patient.

Keyhole neuroendoscopic transfrontal ultrasound-guided hematoma removal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Keyhole neuroendoscopic transfrontal ultrasound-guided hematoma removal in basal ganglia region:According to the brain CT scan and reconstruct the operation plan, choose a side by 2 cm before the coronal suture line 4 cm and 3 cm center longitudinal incision formation of 2 cm bone drilling the hole, ultrasonic measurement and the size of hematoma puncture depth, and guide the puncture direction, the transparent channel under endoscopic direct placement hematoma backend, after entering the hematoma cavity, under the neural endoscopic removal of hematoma,Wash the hematoma cavity with warm salt water.Bipolar electrocoagulation hemostasis for active bleeding.An indwelling drainage tube was placed in the hematoma cavity, and ultrasonography determined that the hematoma was cleared satisfily without active bleeding.

Microsurgery group

After a full evaluation of the patient's condition, the informed consent was signed to perform small bone window craniotomy for hematoma removal under microscope for the patient.

Small bone window craniotomy for hematoma removal under microscope

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Small bone window craniotomy for hematoma removal under microscope:Small bone window craniotomy in frontotemporal region, no blood vessels and non-functional areas of the hematoma nearest to the cortex was cut open, the hematoma was removed under the microscope and the cavity of the hematoma was washed with warm saline, and bipolar electrocoagulation hemostasis was performed for active bleeding.An indwelling drainage tube was placed in the hematoma cavity and the operation was completed without active bleeding.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Keyhole neuroendoscopic transfrontal ultrasound-guided hematoma removal

Keyhole neuroendoscopic transfrontal ultrasound-guided hematoma removal in basal ganglia region:According to the brain CT scan and reconstruct the operation plan, choose a side by 2 cm before the coronal suture line 4 cm and 3 cm center longitudinal incision formation of 2 cm bone drilling the hole, ultrasonic measurement and the size of hematoma puncture depth, and guide the puncture direction, the transparent channel under endoscopic direct placement hematoma backend, after entering the hematoma cavity, under the neural endoscopic removal of hematoma,Wash the hematoma cavity with warm salt water.Bipolar electrocoagulation hemostasis for active bleeding.An indwelling drainage tube was placed in the hematoma cavity, and ultrasonography determined that the hematoma was cleared satisfily without active bleeding.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Small bone window craniotomy for hematoma removal under microscope

Small bone window craniotomy for hematoma removal under microscope:Small bone window craniotomy in frontotemporal region, no blood vessels and non-functional areas of the hematoma nearest to the cortex was cut open, the hematoma was removed under the microscope and the cavity of the hematoma was washed with warm saline, and bipolar electrocoagulation hemostasis was performed for active bleeding.An indwelling drainage tube was placed in the hematoma cavity and the operation was completed without active bleeding.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* CT scan was used to diagnose cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia region. The amount of bleeding was 30-50ml, and no cerebral hernia was formed.
* Age between 30 and 70
* The onset is longer than 24 hours and less than 72 hours.
* Informed consent of the patient and/or their relative.

Exclusion Criteria

* Brain injury, hemorrhage caused by intracranial aneurysm or cerebral arteriovenous malformation.
* Coagulation dysfunction
* Insufficiency of vital organs of heart, liver, kidney or lung
* Previous history of stroke with functional loss
* Intracranial or systemic infection
* Poor blood pressure control

Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No