Optimum Length of Catheter in the Epidural Space for Labor Analgesia in Non-obese Women: a Randomised Controlled Trial of 4 Cm Versus 5 Cm
NCT ID: NCT04946032
Last Updated: 2025-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-23
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that catheters inserted to 4 cm will have a lower rate of failure when compared to those inserted to 5 cm.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the difference in quality of labor analgesia delivered by epidural catheters inserted to either 4 or 5 cm into the epidural space.
This study will be conducted as an interventional double-blinded randomised control trial to establish best practice.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimal Regimen of Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia in Laboring Patients
NCT03566342
Failed Epidural Anesthesia During Labor: Evaluation of Risk Factors and Outcome
NCT03129022
Levobupivacaine for Epidural Analgesia in Labour
NCT00929682
Combined Implementation of Dural Puncture Epidural and Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia
NCT03366935
Effect of Epidural Catheter Retention Depth on Labor Analgesia Performed in DPE Combined With PIEB Model
NCT06602440
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Previous studies have advocated, for varying reasons, different lengths of catheter to be left in the space; these range from 2cm to 8cm. Longer epidural lengths in the space can be associated with foraminal escape, leading to unilateral block, and intravascular insertion, prompting additional manipulation. Shorter lengths have previously been associated with more frequent dislodgement. The directionality of the epidural catheter once in the space has been demonstrated to correlate with misdirection.
The aim of the study would be to standardize practice in how much epidural catheter is threaded into the epidural space.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
4 cm epidural catheter
The epidural catheter will be thread into the epidural space at a length of 4 cm.
Epidural catheter
The epidural catheter length will vary, either 4 cm or 5 cm into the epidural space.
5 cm epidural catheter
The epidural catheter will be thread into the epidural space at a length of 5 cm.
Epidural catheter
The epidural catheter length will vary, either 4 cm or 5 cm into the epidural space.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Epidural catheter
The epidural catheter length will vary, either 4 cm or 5 cm into the epidural space.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* In established second stage of labor.
* 3-7 cm dilation at time of insertion.
* Women with BMI \< 40 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability or unwillingness to provide written consent.
* Previous difficult epidural insertion.
* Previous failed epidural.
* Imminent instrumental or operative delivery.
* Dural puncture.
* Combined spinal epidural analgesia.
* High BMI \> 40 kg/m2
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mrinalini Balki, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
William Turner, MD
Role: backup
Linda Boonstra-Verbraak, MD
Role: backup
Kristi Downey, MSc
Role: backup
Naveed Siddiqui, MD
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21-06
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.