Effect of Coolant Spray on Traumatic Rib Pain of Geriatric Patients
NCT ID: NCT04937933
Last Updated: 2021-06-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
101 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-01
2020-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Cool Spray and Cold Packs in Reducing Preoperative Edema and Pain in Ankle Fractures in Ubonratchathani
NCT06293209
Hand Cooling With Ice Packs in Healthy Young Men
NCT07254182
Trial of Therapeutic Hypothermia in Patients With ARDS
NCT04545424
Efficacy of Blanketrol III and Arctic Sun in Cooling Non-shivering Humans
NCT04332224
Acute Effects of Cryotherapy on Muscle Properties
NCT06608836
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Coolant spray group
Coolant spray (Cryos ®Spray, Phyto Performance, Italy) was applied as suggested by the manufacturer (at a distance of 20 cm from the injured area for 5-10 s). Saline solution was sprayed for the same duration and at the same distance from the injured area as well. The first spray application was performed after the initial assessment, and the second spray application was performed at the end of the 30th minute (immediately after the pain level/score measurement). All patients were given intravenous (IV) dexketoprofen (50 mg in 50 ml standard saline solution) in 5 minutes simultaneously with the first spray application. The physicians applied the designated treatment protocol for each treatment group. As a rescue analgesic treatment, patients were scheduled to be given IV fentanyl at a dose of 1 mcg/kg.
Coolant spray (Cryos ®Spray, Phyto Performance, Italy)
The coolant spray treatment method is a cryotherapy non-pharmacological treatment choice.
Placebo group
A standard saline solution in a bottle covered with opaque white paper and refrigerated at 4°C was prepared. Saline solution was sprayed for the same duration and at the same distance from the injured area as well like coolant spray application. The first spray application was performed after the initial assessment, and the second spray application was performed at the end of the 30th minute (immediately after the pain level/score measurement). All patients were given intravenous (IV) dexketoprofen (50 mg in 50 ml standard saline solution) in 5 minutes simultaneously with the first spray application. The physicians applied the designated treatment protocol for each treatment group. As a rescue analgesic treatment, patients were scheduled to be given IV fentanyl at a dose of 1 mcg/kg.
Saline solution
saline solution
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Coolant spray (Cryos ®Spray, Phyto Performance, Italy)
The coolant spray treatment method is a cryotherapy non-pharmacological treatment choice.
Saline solution
saline solution
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of rib fractures below 3 (6).
* Rib fractures being limited to a single hemithorax.
* Having a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 or more.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with chest injury scores above 11 were excluded from the study because of the insufficiency of this multimodal treatment.
* Having additional trauma-related injuries (including lung contusion, pneumothorax, hemothorax, etc.), skin lesions at the site of trauma, and/or trauma-related pain in multiple regions of the thorax.
* Patients with fractures in ribs 1 and 2 (in terms of the risk of serious injury that may accompany).
* History of regular analgesic usage (such as chronic pain syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis), antiaggregant and anticoagulant drug usage, and/or allergy to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) and narcotic analgesics.
* History of having coagulation disorders, hematologic disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, uncontrolled heart failure, chronic renal failure, chronic liver failure, and chronic lung disease.
* Patients in whom trauma-related complications developed during the ED follow-up, the general condition worsened, vital signs were unstable, and patients that needed to be hospitalized.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ataturk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdullah Osman KOCAK
Associate Professor of Emergency Department of Ataturk University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ataturk University
Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Peek J, Smeeing DPJ, Hietbrink F, Houwert RM, Marsman M, de Jong MB. Comparison of analgesic interventions for traumatic rib fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Aug;45(4):597-622. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0918-7. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
Gur STA, Dogruyol S, Kocak AO, Akbas I, Tuncer K, Karabulut H, Cakir Z. Comparison of effectiveness coolant spray and placebo in patients with acute ankle trauma prospective randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1458-1462. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.12.054. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
Farion KJ, Splinter KL, Newhook K, Gaboury I, Splinter WM. The effect of vapocoolant spray on pain due to intravenous cannulation in children: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2008 Jul 1;179(1):31-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070874.
Waterhouse MR, Liu DR, Wang VJ. Cryotherapeutic topical analgesics for pediatric intravenous catheter placement: ice versus vapocoolant spray. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):8-12. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31827b214b.
Zhu Y, Peng X, Wang S, Chen W, Liu C, Guo B, Zhao L, Gao Y, Wang K, Lou F. Vapocoolant spray versus placebo spray/no treatment for reducing pain from intravenous cannulation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;36(11):2085-2092. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.068. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ataturk University00001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.