Monopolar Current Cutting Knife vs Bipolar RFA Knife

NCT ID: NCT04919824

Last Updated: 2025-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-25

Study Completion Date

2025-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, randomized trial that aims to study the efficacy and clinical outcomes of a novel Bipolar Knife vs. Monopolar Knives on patients who undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel technique for the removal of advanced colonic polyps with high-risk features. ESD is minimally invasive and allows the removal of colonic adenomatous polyp without resorting to surgery. The process of ESD includes marking the lesions selected for removal, followed by submucosal injection of a lifting agent, then circumferential incisions using a specialized knife followed by submucosal dissection of the entire lesion.

Traditionally, knifes utilizing monopolar current such as dual knife or hybrid knife were the preferred tools for endoscopic submucosal dissection. These knifes allows accurate dissection and excellent hemostasis. However, due to monopolar current generated heat, post coagulation syndrome can be seen in up to 8 to 40 % of patients. Post coagulation syndrome present with abdominal pain, fever and leukocytosis and requires supportive treatment with IV fluid and antibiotics. Recently, a novel bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) knife were approved by FDA for the performance of ESD. The knife utilizes bipolar RFA current for submucosal dissection which can potentially expedite submucosal dissection and decrease the rates of post polypectomy syndrome.

Our tertiary referral center Baylor St Luke's Medical Center is center of excellence for ESD procedure and we have previously reported our ESD experience using specialized stability and traction device and monopolar current knife in 111 patients. The goal of our protocol is to compare the performance of monopolar current cutting knife and bipolar RFA knife in colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bipolar Knife

ESD procedure performed with a novel bipolar knife.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel technique for the removal of advanced colonic polyps with high-risk features. ESD is minimally invasive and allows the removal of colonic adenomatous polyp without resorting to surgery. The process of ESD includes marking the lesions selected for removal, followed by submucosal injection of a lifting agent, then circumferential incisions using a specialized knife followed by submucosal dissection of the entire lesion.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a conventional endoscopic technique commonly used for the resection of superficial neoplastic lesions in the GI tract. EMR carries lower morbidity and mortality compared to surgery.

Monopolar Knife

ESD procedure performed with monopolar knives.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel technique for the removal of advanced colonic polyps with high-risk features. ESD is minimally invasive and allows the removal of colonic adenomatous polyp without resorting to surgery. The process of ESD includes marking the lesions selected for removal, followed by submucosal injection of a lifting agent, then circumferential incisions using a specialized knife followed by submucosal dissection of the entire lesion.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a conventional endoscopic technique commonly used for the resection of superficial neoplastic lesions in the GI tract. EMR carries lower morbidity and mortality compared to surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel technique for the removal of advanced colonic polyps with high-risk features. ESD is minimally invasive and allows the removal of colonic adenomatous polyp without resorting to surgery. The process of ESD includes marking the lesions selected for removal, followed by submucosal injection of a lifting agent, then circumferential incisions using a specialized knife followed by submucosal dissection of the entire lesion.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a conventional endoscopic technique commonly used for the resection of superficial neoplastic lesions in the GI tract. EMR carries lower morbidity and mortality compared to surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ESD EMR, Endoscopic resection

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient is ≥ 18 years old
2. Patient is capable of providing informed consent
3. Patient is referred for ESD procedure of gastrointestinal neoplastic lesions

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient is \< 18 years old
2. Patient refused and/or unable to provide consent
3. Patient is a pregnant woman
4. Patients with lesions removed with other techniques besides ESD or a modified ESD technique (i.e., EMR or TEM) as defined in the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) guidelines for endoscopic resection of lesions.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Baylor College of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Othman, MD

M.D. Director of Advanced Endoscopy Assistant Professor of Medicine - Gastroenterology Section

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor St. Lukes Medical Center (BSLMC)

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Ishihara R, Iishi H, Kizu T, Inoue T, Chatani R, Hanaoka N, Taniguchi T, Kawada N, Higashino K, Shimokawa T, Tatsuta M. Efficacy of an endo-knife with a water-jet function (Flushknife) for endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):314-22. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.547. Epub 2009 Sep 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19773749 (View on PubMed)

Hong MJ, Kim JH, Lee SY, Sung IK, Park HS, Shim CS. Prevalence and clinical features of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Jan;60(1):211-6. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3484-9. Epub 2014 Dec 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25502119 (View on PubMed)

Jung D, Youn YH, Jahng J, Kim JH, Park H. Risk of electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colon and rectum. Endoscopy. 2013 Sep;45(9):714-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344555. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23990482 (View on PubMed)

Tsiamoulos ZP, Sebastian J, Bagla N, Hancock C, Saunders BP. A new approach to endoscopic submucosal tunneling dissection: the "Speedboat-RS2" device. Endoscopy. 2019 Jul;51(7):E185-E186. doi: 10.1055/a-0875-3352. Epub 2019 Apr 12. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30978741 (View on PubMed)

Ismail MS, Bahdi F, Mercado MO, Habazi R, Alexander A, Prabhu S, John S, Kovvali C, Othman MO. ESD with double-balloon endoluminal intervention platform versus standard ESD for management of colon polyps. Endosc Int Open. 2020 Oct;8(10):E1273-E1279. doi: 10.1055/a-1226-6372. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33015328 (View on PubMed)

Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, Gao Y, Mo Z, Gao F. Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy. 2009 Sep;41(9):751-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215053. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19693750 (View on PubMed)

Shinmura K, Ikematsu H, Kojima M, Nakamura H, Osera S, Yoda Y, Hori K, Oono Y, Ochiai A, Yano T. Safety of endoscopic procedures with monopolar versus bipolar instruments in an ex vivo porcine model. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-1176-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32005163 (View on PubMed)

Williams CB, de Peyer RC. Bipolar snare polypectomy--a safer technique for electrocoagulation of large polyp stalks. Endoscopy. 1979 Feb;11(1):47-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1098324.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 428352 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-49483

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PULSed Field ablAtion of coloRectal Polyps
NCT06317727 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
ConMed Beamer Study
NCT04752670 COMPLETED