Novel Rigidizing Overtube in Colonic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
NCT ID: NCT06134687
Last Updated: 2025-08-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-04
2025-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The research team hypothesize that with utilizing a novel rigidizing overtube the procedure time including dissection speed and closure time will be faster due to higher scope stability and greater control over the scope tip. Subsequently, the investigators anticipate lower immediate or delayed adverse events.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Traction vs. No Traction in Colonic ESD
NCT06159634
Prospective Cohort Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Endorobotics for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (Endorobotics ESD)
NCT06726798
Pathfinder Registry
NCT05141032
Magnetic Guided Counetrtraction During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
NCT06962293
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
NCT01378507
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Historically, various methods have been applied to facilitate colonoscopy and scope advancement in challenging positions and redundant colonic loops such as application of external pressure, exchange to pediatric colonoscope, torque-based reduction maneuvers, and patient repositioning. However, despite these, scope tip stabilization could potentially remain as a challenging and limiting factor for procedure progress and could lead to a longer procedure time, sedation time and perhaps lower procedure success rate. In comparison overtube-assisted colonoscopy allows for straightening of the colon to decrease angulation and loop formation.3 Several variations of overtubes have been put to use in the last few decades with comparable results such as single-balloon and double-balloon enteroscope, spiral overtube-assisted colonoscopy and double-balloon platform (DiLumenTM). DiLumen system consists of a plastic sheet fitting layer with two balloon few inches from each other in the tip of the device facilitating the scope tip stability. Most recently the efficacy of DiLumen platform were evaluated in a multicenter study including 162 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of advanced polyps.4 In this study technical success was achieved in 92% of patients without any device related adverse event. 4 In this study using an overtube resulted in faster and more efficient dissection.4 In a retrospective study of 88 polyps located within the proximal colon, ESD with assistance of traditional single balloon overtube resulted in significantly less perforation rate in polyps ≥ 40mm in the proximal colon, despite overall similar en bloc and R0 resection rates comparison to conventional ESD.5 Most recently, a novel dynamic rigidizing overtube (Pathfinder, Neptune Medical, Burlingame, Calif, USA) has been introduced to face the challenges encountered during difficult colonoscopies and to ensure scope stabilization during endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and ESD. The overtube material is soft and pliable on flexible state, however when the vacuum is applied the entire tube becomes 15 times stiffer.6 This unique feature of the device provides scope flexibility during colonoscope introduction and entire device stability when rigidizing system is applied.
Our team collected preliminary prospective data of 58 polyps removed by EMR (24.1%) and ESD (75.9% ) with the assistance off rigidizing overtube. Technical success (ability to complete the entire resection using the device) and clinical success (ability of endoscopic removal of polyps without changing the initial resection intent) was achieved 100% and 90% of the time, respectively. On endoscopist feedback, the rigidizing overtube was though to assist in resection in 98.3% of polyps, although the polyp was located in a somewhat/very difficult location 81% of the time. For polyps in difficult locations, the rigidizing overtube was able to maintain scope position without falling back even once, 55% of the time. This result was presented at the most recent Digestive Disease Week conference in Chicago 2023 (p1932).
As this device has been put to use recently in the United States, published literature to demonstrate its safety and efficacy in colonic ESD is lacking. The main aim of this study is to compare the feasibility, safety efficacy, and clinical outcomes of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) utilizing a novel rigidizing overtube called Pathfinder® Endoscope Overtube (Neptune Medical, Burlingame CA, USA) device in comparison to conventional ESD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment arm
Will have endoscopic submucosal dissection performed with the use of the Pathfinder Endoscope Overtube.
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Removal of study eligible lesions per endoscopic submucosal dissection
Novel Rigidizing Overtube
Utilization of the Novel Rigidizing Overtube (Pathfinder) to aid in performing colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection
Control arm
Will have endoscopic submucosal dissection performed through conventional means (i.e. without the Pathfinder Endoscope Overtube).
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Removal of study eligible lesions per endoscopic submucosal dissection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Removal of study eligible lesions per endoscopic submucosal dissection
Novel Rigidizing Overtube
Utilization of the Novel Rigidizing Overtube (Pathfinder) to aid in performing colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients can provide written informed consent.
* Patient is referred for ESD procedure of colonic neoplastic lesions and with one of the following criteria:
A - Lesions with prior resection or with scar at any size proximal to the sigmoid colon.
B - Granular lateral spreading tumors (GLST) more than 30mm. C - Non granular lateral spreading tumors (NGLST) more than 20 mm. D - Any suspected submucosal invasion such as Paris classification II a +II or lesions with positive non lifting sign.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient is a pregnant or nursing woman.
* Lesions with morphology: pedunculated type (Paris Ip, Ips).
* Lesions located within the sigmoid colon or rectum.
* Lesions involving appendiceal orifice or ileocecal valve
22 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baylor College of Medicine
OTHER
Neptune Medical, Inc.
UNKNOWN
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Othman, MD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohamed Othman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baylor College of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
Baylor St. Lukes Medical Center (BSLMC)
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-53924
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.