Tension Band Versus Locking Plate Fixation for the Treatment of Patella Fractures

NCT ID: NCT04891549

Last Updated: 2026-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

122 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a multicenter pragmatic, prospective, assessor-blinded, randomized independent clinical trial in which we compare locking plate fixation to standard tension band fixation in patients with patella fractures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a multicenter pragmatic, prospective, assessor-blinded, randomized independent clinical trial in which we compare locking plate fixation to standard tension band fixation in patients with patella fractures.

Primary objective The overall objective of the study is to compare the 1-year patient-reported Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS5) after standard tension band fixation with locking plat fixation for patients with patella fractures.

Secondary objectives Several other analyses are of interest and are planned but are not objectives of this study. Therefore, these analyses will, for the major part, hypothesis-generating. Analyses of this type include, but are not limited to harms, muscle atrophy, pain, general health, gait function, time to return to work and economical consequences between the two groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patella Fracture Surgery Orthopedic Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study is a multicenter pragmatic, prospective, assessor-blinded, randomized independent clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
Due to the surgical nature of the study the surgeon can not be blinded. The outcome assessor, patients and care providers will be blinded with regards to the two treatment groups.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tension band fixation

Surgical fixation of the patella fracture utilizing the AO principles using K-wires, screws, cerclage and sutures by surgeons choice.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tension band fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fracture fixation of the patella fracture with tension band.

Plate fixation

Surgical fixation of the patella fracture utilizing the AO principles and a locking plate with the number of screws by surgeons choice. Additional fixation by surgeons choice.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Plate fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fracture fixation of the patella fracture with a plate.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tension band fixation

Fracture fixation of the patella fracture with tension band.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Plate fixation

Fracture fixation of the patella fracture with a plate.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Above 18 years of age
* Patella fracture suitable for surgically treatment, with both surgical methods
* AO classification 34-B, 34-C

Exclusion Criteria

* Open patella fracture above Gustillo grade 2
* Bilateral patella fracture
* Total knee replacement in the affected extremity
* Other fractures of the affected extremity within the previous 12 months.
* Other reasons for exclusion (unable to understand Danish, mentally unable to participate, etc).
* Prior ipsilateral patella fracture
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aarhus University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Randers Regional Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Regional Hospital Hjoerring

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Regional Hospital Kolding

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Viborg Regional Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rasmus Elsøe

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rasmus Elsøe

Head of orthopaedic trauma surgery

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rasmus Elsoe, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark

Peter Larsen, PT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aalborg University Hospital

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Regional Hospital Hjoerring

Hjørring, , Denmark

Site Status

Regional Hospital Kolding

Kolding, , Denmark

Site Status

Regional Hospital Randers

Randers, , Denmark

Site Status

Regional Hospital Viborg

Viborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elsoe R, Thorninger R, Severinsen R, Beuke JC, Serritslev R, Jensen SS, Rasmussen MK, Szephalmi P, Petruskevicius J, Barckman J, Bruun NH, Larsen P. Tension band versus locking plate fixation for patella fractures - a protocol of a randomised controlled trial. Dan Med J. 2024 Apr 10;71(5):A12230753. doi: 10.61409/A12230753.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38704836 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LERG2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.