Restricted vs. Free Knee Range Of Motion For Primary Traumatic Patellar Dislocation
NCT ID: NCT01344915
Last Updated: 2011-05-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-12-31
2011-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Outcome After Treatment of Patellar Fractures With Locking Plates
NCT02015975
Knee Dislocation - Clinical Evaluation of the Use of Hinged External Fixator After Ligament Reconstruction
NCT02290197
Late Compared to Early Physiotherapy Following Knee Dislocation
NCT01296750
Patellar Stability After MPFL Reconstruction With Fascia Lata Allograft: Conventional CT vs Under Weight-bearing CT
NCT04242732
Tension Band Versus Locking Plate Fixation for the Treatment of Patella Fractures
NCT04891549
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Knee brace
Locked knee brace
Locked knee brace
Locked knee brace
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Locked knee brace
Locked knee brace
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signs of patellar dislocation in MRI
Exclusion Criteria
* osteochondral fracture requiring surgery
* associated knee injuries
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tampere University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tampere University Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Petri J Sillanpää, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tampere University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tampere University Hospital
Tampere, , Finland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Honkonen EE, Sillanpaa PJ, Reito A, Maenpaa H, Mattila VM. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Patella-Stabilizing, Motion-Restricting Knee Brace Versus a Neoprene Nonhinged Knee Brace After a First-Time Traumatic Patellar Dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jun;50(7):1867-1875. doi: 10.1177/03635465221090644. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PATRCTFIN
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.