Advantages of 3D Printing in the Management of Acetabular Fractures
NCT ID: NCT04660734
Last Updated: 2020-12-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
109 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-01
2019-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Questions: Is there a difference in the surgical time of the Kocher-langenbeck reduction and fixation of the posterior structures of the acetabulum between 3D printing (which allows for shaping of the reconstruction plate prior to surgery) and the conventional technique? Are there any differences in complications between the two techniques? Are there any short-term differences in the functional and radiographic scores between 3D printing and the conventional technique? Methods: 109 consecutive patients who sustained fractures of the acetabulum were screened for inclusion. 43 patient were studied. The first group (G1) consisted of 20 patients who underwent prior molding of the osteosynthesis plate on a 3D-printed model. The second group (G2 or control group) included 23 patients who underwent surgery using the conventional technique. We compared surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, the difference between pre- and postoperative hemoglobin, and the onset of early infection, paralysis of the sciatic nerve, and deep vein thrombosis.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (G1) consisted of 20 patients who underwent preoperative molding of the osteosynthesis plate on a 3D printed model of the pelvis. Group 2 (G2 or control group) included 23 patients who underwent surgery using the conventional technique.
All patients were examined in the outpatient department via clinical and radiographic evaluation at 3, 6, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively, then every 6 months thereafter. A standard radiographic assessment including three views (AP, iliac oblique, and obturator oblique) and a pelvic CT scan were obtained for all patients at the last follow-up visit. The reductions were classified as one of three types: anatomical (residual displacement \<1 mm), imperfect (residual displacement 1 to 3 mm), and poor (residual reduction \>3 mm). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Harris Hip score. Bone consolidation was obtained in all cases. Clinical and radiographic results at the last follow-up as well as the minimum follow-up duration were evaluated by one surgeon who did not participate in the surgical management of the patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
3D printing group
Group 1 (G1) consisted of 20 patients who underwent preoperative molding of the osteosynthesis plate on a 3D printed model of the pelvis. A preoperative scan of the healthy hemi-pelvis was used to create the 3D-printed model for patients in G1 according to the following three-step methodology: 1) A scanographic acquisition of images was performed using a multi-strip scanner in thin sections. These images were recorded as digital images in the standard medical format of digital imaging and communications ; 2) A digital, 3D model of the pelvis in the stereolithography format was created to digitally treat the 2D images. The individualization of the healthy hemi-pelvis, to which a "mirror effect" was applied allowed for the creation of a symmetrical 3D image, as hemi-pelvises are globally symmetrical. 3) A 3D printer was used to create a physical, 3D-printed model of the affected hemi-pelvis using polylactic acid.
Fractures of the posterior structures of the acetabulum treated by fixation using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach.
Fracture fixation of posterior structures of acetabulum by using the surgical procedure of Kocher-Langenbeck approach
conventional technique group
Group 2 (G2 or control group) included 23 patients who underwent surgery using the conventional technique.The patients in the control group (G2) underwent surgery following the conventional procedure based on radiographic and CT images with 3D reconstructions.
Fractures of the posterior structures of the acetabulum treated by fixation using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach.
Fracture fixation of posterior structures of acetabulum by using the surgical procedure of Kocher-Langenbeck approach
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fractures of the posterior structures of the acetabulum treated by fixation using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach.
Fracture fixation of posterior structures of acetabulum by using the surgical procedure of Kocher-Langenbeck approach
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* treatment using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach.
Exclusion Criteria
* treatment approach other than the Kocher-Langenbeck's ( eg orthopedic method)
* open fractures of the pelvis
* fractures of the acetabulum older than 3-weeks
* polytrauma with/or multiple fractures.
* unavailability for follow-up
* insufficient clinical and radiographic data.
23 Years
57 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Tunis El Manar
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Bouabdellah
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mondher Kooli, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orthopedic and traumatologic department of Charles Nicolle Hospital
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wang P, Kandemir U, Zhang B, Fei C, Zhuang Y, Zhang K. The effect of new preoperative preparation method compared to conventional method in complex acetabular fractures: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Feb;141(2):215-222. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03472-w. Epub 2020 May 26.
Hsu CL, Chou YC, Li YT, Chen JE, Hung CC, Wu CC, Shen HC, Yeh TT. Pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing techniques for the surgical management of acetabular fractures. Int Orthop. 2019 Aug;43(8):1969-1976. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4111-8. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
Bouabdellah M, Bensalah M, Kamoun C, Bellil M, Kooli M, Hadhri K. Advantages of three-dimensional printing in the management of acetabular fracture fixed by the Kocher-Langenbeck approach: randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2022 May;46(5):1155-1163. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05319-y. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
01031972
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id