Effect of Routine Anterior Crural Repair in De-Novo Gastroesophageal Reflux After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT ID: NCT04884074
Last Updated: 2021-05-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-01
2025-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Crural Repair During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients With a Lax Gastroesophageal Junction
NCT05330910
A 3-Arm Study Comparing the Efficacy of Anti-Reflux Reconstruction Protocols After Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT06347757
Sleeve Gastrectomy With Reestablishment of the Acute Angle of His (SG-REACH) in Obese Patients
NCT05452980
Antireflux Efficacy of Hiatal Hernia Repairs in Sleeve Gastrectomy Patients
NCT04433507
Clinical Trial of Reconstruction After Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT05418920
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD is a major health concern after LSG. It has been observed in the bariatric surgical community that many patients are complaining of persisted GERD symptoms after LSG surgery.
Aiming to avoid post-operative GERD, hiatal dissection with crural repair had been suggested to be performed on top of the sleeve gastrectomy procedure.
Data Collection Baseline data collection: All potential candidates will be screened for secondary causes of obesity, such as hypothyroidism and Cushing's syndrome, and are assessed for severity of obesity-related diseases including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and hyperlipidaemia. Extensive counseling will be given and potential benefits and complications of treatments will be discussed with all participants at least 4 weeks prior to recruitment.
Procedure data: Operative time, blood loss and total hospital stay are captured prospectively. All peri-operative complications will be documented and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification System to facilitate comparison.
Follow-up and assessment:
Patients will be followed up at a designated Multi-disciplinary Clinic of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year after the operation. A standard dietary and exercise regimen will be prescribed to the patients, and their compliance to the life-style modification is monitored by designated dietitians. Counselling will be provided whenever necessary.
They are assessed for symptomatology according to a standard checklist by independent assessors who are blind to the mode of surgery performed. Data collection and blood tests, endoscopy and esophageal function test (see below) will be carried out during clinic visits.
Adherence to Good Clinical Practices (GCPs) This trial will reference the international ethical principles endorsed by the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki as well as ICH/GCP Standards, and any other applicable local laws or regulations
Data Completion and Record Keeping The hard-copy of patients' medical records will be kept in the Prince of Wales Hospital and the electronic information regarding patient information will be stored in the University/Hospital computer and password encrypted. Only the principle investigator, co-investigator and the research nurse will have the right to access these data. Data will be stored for 5 years and after completion of study, both hard \& soft copy of the patients \& study data will be destroyed and deleted of a body function or damage to a body structure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The study group
The procedure done to this group is Sleeve Gastrectomy with Anterior Crural Repair (ACR)
Standard Sleeve Gastrectomy plus Anterior Crural Repair
The procedure is performed in a similar fashion as standard sleeve gastrectomy. After gastric mobilization is completed as standard sleeve gastrectomy, the anterior phrenoesophageal ligament is divided and distal 3cm esophagus is mobilized. A Mid-Sleeve tube (40Fr) is inserted per-orally by the anesthetist and the hiatus opening is closed with 2/0 non-absorbable suture over the bougie anterior to the esophagus. The hiatus repair was sized by comfortably placement a dissection forceps adjacent to the esophagus without tension. Sleeve gastrectomy is then performed as the standard technique.
The control group
The procedure done to this group is the Standard Sleeve Gastrectomy (SSG)
Standard sleeve gastrectomy (SSG, the control group)
The procedure is performed in French position with a standard 5-port approach and a pneumoperitoneum not exceeding 15mmHg.
The greater omentum is then completely detached from the greater curvature of stomach using either ultrasonic or bipolar shear device. All adhesion between posterior gastric wall and pancreatic capsule is freed and the cardia is completely free with left crura completely exposed. A Mid-Sleeve tube (40Fr) is inserted per-orally by the anesthetist with its balloon tip reaching the gastric antrum and insufflated with 50cc of air. Sleeve gastrectomy is then performed using laparoscopic linear staplers, starting from a point 5-6cm proximal to the pylorus up cardia at about 1cm lateral to the angle of His, along the Mid-sleeve tube which is lying against the lesser curve of stomach. The staple line is reinforced with absorbable sutures. Distal stomach is anchored at retroperitoneum with non-absorbable stitch.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard Sleeve Gastrectomy plus Anterior Crural Repair
The procedure is performed in a similar fashion as standard sleeve gastrectomy. After gastric mobilization is completed as standard sleeve gastrectomy, the anterior phrenoesophageal ligament is divided and distal 3cm esophagus is mobilized. A Mid-Sleeve tube (40Fr) is inserted per-orally by the anesthetist and the hiatus opening is closed with 2/0 non-absorbable suture over the bougie anterior to the esophagus. The hiatus repair was sized by comfortably placement a dissection forceps adjacent to the esophagus without tension. Sleeve gastrectomy is then performed as the standard technique.
Standard sleeve gastrectomy (SSG, the control group)
The procedure is performed in French position with a standard 5-port approach and a pneumoperitoneum not exceeding 15mmHg.
The greater omentum is then completely detached from the greater curvature of stomach using either ultrasonic or bipolar shear device. All adhesion between posterior gastric wall and pancreatic capsule is freed and the cardia is completely free with left crura completely exposed. A Mid-Sleeve tube (40Fr) is inserted per-orally by the anesthetist with its balloon tip reaching the gastric antrum and insufflated with 50cc of air. Sleeve gastrectomy is then performed using laparoscopic linear staplers, starting from a point 5-6cm proximal to the pylorus up cardia at about 1cm lateral to the angle of His, along the Mid-sleeve tube which is lying against the lesser curve of stomach. The staple line is reinforced with absorbable sutures. Distal stomach is anchored at retroperitoneum with non-absorbable stitch.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
i. BMI more than 35 kg/m2 with or without co-morbidities. ii. BMI more than 30 kg/m2 with obesity related co-morbidities.
2. Subject without evidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease i. Symptomatic - No gastroesophageal reflux symptom (GerdQ score no greater than 7) ii. Endoscopic - No esophagitis. No Hiatus Hernia (apparent separation distance between the squamocolumnar junction and the diaphragmatic impression greater than 2 cm) iii. Functional
1\. High-resolution manometry 2. 24-hour esophageal pH study 4. ASA Class I - III 5. Subject is willing to give consent and comply with evaluation and treatment scheduled
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of Hiatus hernia (\>2cm) or esophagitis
3. Previous upper GI surgery (e.g. bariatric surgery, anti-reflux surgery; gastrectomy; esophageal surgery)
4. Underlying uncontrolled endocrine problem that lead to obesity. (e.g. Hypothyroidism, Cushing syndrome, eating disorder etc)
5. ASA grade IV \& V
6. Mental or psychiatric disorder; Drug or alcohol addiction
7. Cirrhosis or portal hypertension
8. Pregnant or breast feeding
9. Any condition which precludes compliance with the study;
10. History or presence of pre-existing autoimmune connective tissue disease
11. Active malignant disease. Patients with malignant disease who have been disease-free for at least 5 years are eligible
12. Active infection
13. Life expectancy less than 12 months
14. Special population, e.g. prisoner, mentally disabled, investigators' student or employees
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Enders K.W. Ng
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Suter M, Dorta G, Giusti V, Calmes JM. Gastro-esophageal reflux and esophageal motility disorders in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2004 Aug;14(7):959-66. doi: 10.1381/0960892041719581.
Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Balupuri S, Small PK. Sleeve gastrectomy and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a complex relationship. Obes Surg. 2013 Jul;23(7):987-91. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-0899-x.
Tai CM, Huang CK. Increase in gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and erosive esophagitis 1 year after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy among obese adults. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3937. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3022-4. Epub 2013 May 25. No abstract available.
Daes J, Jimenez ME, Said N, Dennis R. Improvement of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after standardized laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2014 Apr;24(4):536-40. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1117-6.
Wong SK, Lok H, Lam CC, Ng EK. Small Hiatus Hernia and Gastroesophgeal Reflux after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Morbidly Obese Chinese. Obes Surg. 2014;24(8):1243.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRE-2016.202
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.