Clinical Trial of Reconstruction After Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT ID: NCT05418920
Last Updated: 2022-07-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-01
2027-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A 3-Arm Study Comparing the Efficacy of Anti-Reflux Reconstruction Protocols After Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT06347757
Sleeve Gastrectomy With Reestablishment of the Acute Angle of His (SG-REACH) in Obese Patients
NCT05452980
Effect of Routine Anterior Crural Repair in De-Novo Gastroesophageal Reflux After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT04884074
A Prospective Observation Registry Study on the Alimentary Reconstruction After Radical Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT05539105
Crural Repair During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients With a Lax Gastroesophageal Junction
NCT05330910
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, the risk of developing reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy is high, which seriously affects patients' postoperative quality of life. In order to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, clinicians continue to improve the methods of GI reconstruction. Currently, the common methods of GI reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy include esophagogastrostomy (EG), jejunal intubation (JI), jejunal pouch intubation (JPI), and dual-tract reconstruction (DTR). However, the choice of the optimal reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy remains controversial, and there is no standard approach to GI reconstruction. In 2016, Kuroda et al. reported a new surgical approach with a double-flap technique after proximal gastrectomy and showed satisfactory short-term outcomes compared with conventional esophagogastric anastomosis. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, no reflux esophagitis was detected in all patients. At the same time, the rate of anastomotic stenosis was noteworthy.
This study will be the first attempt at a left-open single-flap technique, which was modified from the double-flap technique. The short-term outcome was satisfactory in all patients. This study will establish a large sample, multicenter randomized clinical study. By exploring a simple, safe, good absorption and digestive function method of post-proximal gastrectomy reconstruction to improve patients' postoperative quality of life and fill the gap in the comparison of clinical efficacy between left-open single-flap technique and double-flap technique in this specialized field. This will promote the establishment and improvement of the specifications related to gastrointestinal reconstruction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
the trial group (left-opening single-flap group)
left-opening single-flap group
left-opening single-flap technique
left-opening single-flap technique
the control group (double-flap group)
double-flap group
double-flap group technique
double-flap group technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
left-opening single-flap technique
left-opening single-flap technique
double-flap group technique
double-flap group technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Siewert III of the esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0) or adenocarcinoma of the upper part of the stomach: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0), Stage II( cT1-2N1-3M0 / cT3-4N0M0), Stage III(cT3-4aN1-3M0); patients who are suitable for surgery according to the 8th AJCC clinical staging of gastric cancer;
3. Primary lesion diagnosed by preoperative endoscopic end pathology: tumor diameter \<4 cm and located in the upper part of the stomach (including the esophagogastric junction), histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma;
4. Preoperative ASA score: I, II, or III;
5. Preoperative Karnofsky physical status score: ≥ 70%; or preoperative ECOG physical status score: ≤ 2;
6. No distant metastases (confirmed by preoperative chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasound, and upper abdominal CT); no peritoneal implant metastases (confirmed by laparoscopic exploration surgery);
7. R0 surgical outcome is expected to be obtained with radical gastrectomy of D2 proximal gastric cancer;
8. Patients and their families voluntarily participate in this study and sign the informed consent form after understanding the study content.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with clinical stage exceeding Siewert III of the esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0) or more than adenocarcinoma of the upper part of the stomach: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0), Stage II(cT1-2N1-3M0/cT3-4N0M0), Stage III(cT3-4aN1-3M0);
3. Patients with acute infections, especially biliary tract infections;
4. Patients with complications of gastric cancer (bleeding, perforation, obstruction) requiring emergency surgery;
5. Patients with uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction;
6. Patients with vital organ failure, such as heart, lung, liver, brain, kidney, etc.
7. Severe central nervous system disease, mental disorders, or impaired consciousness;
8. Pregnant or lactating women;
9. Patients with distant metastases;
10. Patients with a primary tumor at another site diagnosed within the past 5 years;
11. Preoperative ASA score: ≥ IV;
12. Preoperative ECOG physical status score: ≥ 2;
13. History of continuous systemic corticosteroid therapy within the past 1 month;
14. History of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, or cerebral hemorrhage within the past 6 months;
15. Patients with concurrent surgical treatment of other diseases;
16. Patients with immunodeficiency, immunosuppression, or autoimmune diseases (organ transplant requiring immunosuppressive therapy within the past 5 years, allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients, taking immunosuppressive drugs, etc.);
17. Patients with concurrent participation in other clinical studies;
18. Patients refusing to sign an informed consent form to participate in this study;
19. Preoperative imaging: regional fusion of enlarged lymph nodes (maximal diameter \> 3 cm).
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tang-Du Hospital
OTHER
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
OTHER
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
OTHER
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
OTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
OTHER
Oncogastroenterology Committee of Chinese
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nan Wang, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Tang-Du Hospital
Chao Zhang, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Lei Wang, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
Renwei Chang, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
Junjun She, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yang QC, Wang WD, Mo ZC, Yue C, Zhou HK, Gao RQ, Yu J, Dong DH, Liu JQ, Wei JP, Yang XS, Ji G, Li XH. Study protocol for comparing the efficacy of left-open single-flap technique versus double-flap technique after proximal gastrectomy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 17;12:973810. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.973810. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
single-flap technique
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.