Mechanistic and Clinical Outcomes of a Surgical Innovation Aimed at Minimizing GERD Associated With VSG (INNOVATE-VSG)
NCT ID: NCT06783751
Last Updated: 2025-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-21
2027-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Nissen-Sleeve and Gastric Bypass for GERD in Obese Patients
NCT07158008
Crural Repair During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients With a Lax Gastroesophageal Junction
NCT05330910
Modifications to Gastric Sleeve: Implications for GRED and Quality of Life
NCT07070908
Mandatory Hiatoplasty in Sleeve Gastrectomy for Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease
NCT06316167
Truncal Vagotomy in Patients Undergoing Revisional Sleeve Gastrectomy to Gastric Bypass
NCT04901429
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1 (Primary): to determine whether mVSG, in comparison to conventional vertical sleeve gastrectomy (cVSG), will be associated with lower acid exposure time (AET, measured by the Bravo pH test) at 6-9 months. The investigators hypothesize that, at Month 6-9, compared to cVSG:
• H1. mVSG will be associated with lower AET
Aim 2 (Secondary): To elucidate the mechanistic basis for Aim 1, the investigators will perform following tests, before and at 6-9 months post-surgery: a) High resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) to determine the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and intragastric pressure; b) The endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) testing to examine changes in compliance of the LES; c) Measure the length of the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) on the retroflex view during endoscopic exam. The investigators hypothesize that, at Month 6-9, compared to cVSG:
* H2a. mVSG will be associated with higher LES pressure and lower intragastric pressure
* H2b. mVSG will be associated with lower LES compliance
* H2c. GEFV will be present after mVSG (vs absence after cVSG)
Aim 3: Examine the impact of GERD on quality of life (QoL) with two validated rating scales - Gastroesophageal reflux disease-health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and Short Form-36 (SF-36). The investigators hypothesize that, at 12 months, compared to cVSG:
• H3. mVSG will lead to superior QoL
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Modified Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (mVSG)
modified investigational vertical sleeve gastrectomy (mVSG)
Modified Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (mVSG)
The modified procedure preserves the gastric sling fibers and re-establishes the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV).
Conventional Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (cVSG)
conventional vertical sleeve gastrectomy (cVSG)
Conventional Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (cVSG)
Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy as standard procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Modified Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (mVSG)
The modified procedure preserves the gastric sling fibers and re-establishes the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV).
Conventional Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (cVSG)
Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy as standard procedure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Body mass index (BMI) 35-55 kg/m2
3. Must meet the BMI criteria before and after 6 months of nonsurgical weight management
4. Presence of GERD defined for this trial as acid exposure time (AET) of 4.9% or above as assessed with the Bravo pH test.
5. Have health insurance which pays for the costs of bariatric surgery and standard medical care before and after surgery
6. Women of childbearing potential must be using appropriate contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study, and must have a negative pregnancy test at study entry and prior to surgery
7. Must be able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Evidence of clinically significant major esophageal motility disorder as determined by the site primary investigator
3. Severe gastroparesis
4. Previous bariatric or anti-reflux procedure
5. Barrett's esophagus
6. Subjects requiring mesh treatment at time of procedure
7. Severe heart (e.g., severe heart failure, unstable coronary artery disease), or end-stage lung disease as determined by the site primary investigator
8. Subjects with pacemakers, implantable defibrillators, neurostimulators
9. Portal hypertension or cirrhosis
10. Chronic pancreatitis
11. Active cancer treatment
12. Inability to tolerate general anesthesia
13. Uncontrollable coagulopathy
14. Significant and uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease
15. Severe and/or uncontrolled psychiatric disorder (including psychosis, bipolar disorder) as determined during standard pre-surgery psychiatric screening at the site.
16. Suicidal ideation or unstable/untreated major depressive disorder within the past year
17. Alcohol or substance use disorder within the past year.
18. Pregnant or breastfeeding or planning pregnancy in the coming 24 months
19. Diminished intellectual capacity to consent or follow pre- and post-surgery instructions
20. History of, or any current health condition that, in the opinion of the PI, would make the subject ineligible for sleeve gastrectomy, or put the subject at risk by participation in the study.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
University of California, Irvine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nihn Tuan Nguyen
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ninh T. Nguyen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Irvine
Ravinder K. Mittal, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Diego
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, Irvine
Orange, California, United States
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3451
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.