Vibration and Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis Risk Following ACL Injury
NCT ID: NCT04875052
Last Updated: 2025-05-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
114 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-11
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Quadriceps muscle function
* Gait biomechanics linked to post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis development
* Patient self-report outcomes
* MRI indicators of knee joint health and muscle quality
* Landing biomechanics linked to secondary ACL injury risk
* Evidence-based return-to-physical-activity criteria
Participants will be assigned to 1 of 3 groups (standard rehabilitation, standard rehabilitation + WBV, or standard rehabilitation + LMV) and will complete assessments of quadriceps function, gait biomechanics, landing biomechanics, functional ability, patient-report outcomes, and MRI 1, 6, and 12 months after ACLR. Researchers will compare the groups to see if vibration embedded in ACLR rehabilitation improves joint health outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Whole Body Vibration in Individuals Submitted to ACL
NCT02609971
The Effect of Whole Body Vibration After ACLR
NCT05254054
The Effects of Whole-body Vibration on Increasing Quadriceps Strength in Patients With ACL Ruptures
NCT04988828
Neuromuscular Control in Individuals Following ACL-Reconstruction
NCT04495075
Whole Body Vibration on Running Biomechanics
NCT02851316
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis/Objective: This study will evaluate the effects of vibration embedded in ACLR rehabilitation on quadriceps function, gait biomechanics, landing biomechanics, patient self-report outcomes, return-to-physical-activity (RTPA) criteria, and MRI indicators of knee joint health. The central hypothesis is that vibration will enhance gait and landing biomechanics consistent with reduced PTOA and secondary ACL injury risks, respectively, and that whole body vibration (WBV) delivered by a commercial device and local muscle vibration (LMV) delivered by a prototype device will produce equivalent improvements in the study outcomes. The rationale for the hypothesis is that vibration will more effectively improve quadriceps function compared to standard rehabilitation, thus restoring normal biomechanics and mitigating declines in joint health.
Specific Aim 1: To compare the effects of Standard rehabilitation vs. Vibration rehabilitation (WBV and LMV) on quadriceps function. The investigators hypothesize that Vibration will produce superior outcomes (e.g. strength) compared to Standard rehabilitation, but that WBV and LMV will produce similar outcomes.
Specific Aim 2: To compare the effects of Standard rehabilitation vs. Vibration rehabilitation on gait biomechanics linked to PTOA development. The investigators hypothesize that Vibration will produce superior outcomes compared to Standard rehabilitation, but that WBV and LMV will produce similar outcomes.
Specific Aim 3: To compare the effects of Standard rehabilitation vs. Vibration rehabilitation on patient self-report outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that Vibration will produce superior outcomes compared to Standard rehabilitation, but that WBV and LMV will produce similar outcomes.
Specific Aim 4: To compare the effects of Standard rehabilitation vs. Vibration rehabilitation on MRI indicators of knee joint health. The investigators hypothesize that cartilage composition (e.g. collagen, water, and proteoglycan content) will be poorer and PTOA incidence (MOAKS score) will be higher in the Standard cohort compared to both Vibration cohorts, but that WBV and LMV will produce similar outcomes.
Specific Aim 5: To compare the effects of Standard rehabilitation vs. Vibration rehabilitation on landing biomechanics linked to secondary ACL injury risk. The investigators hypothesize that Vibration will produce superior outcomes compared to Standard rehabilitation, but that WBV and LMV will produce similar outcomes.
Specific Aim 6: To compare the effects of Standard rehabilitation vs. Vibration rehabilitation on the probability of meeting evidence-based RTPA criteria (e.g. single-leg hop symmetry ≥90%). The investigators hypothesize that Vibration will display result in greater probabilities of meeting RTPA criteria compared to Standard rehabilitation at 6 months and 1 year post-ACLR, but that WBV and LMV will produce similar outcomes.
Specific Aim 7: To evaluate changes in quadriceps muscle quality over the first year following ACLR reconstruction surgery. The investigators hypothesize that quadriceps muscle quality will decline at 1, 6 and 12 months post-ACLR compared to preoperative measurements and that these changes will be more pronounced in the ACLR limb compared to the uninjured limb at 1, 6 and 12 months post-ACLR.
Specific Aim 8: To evaluate associations between changes in quadriceps muscle quality over the first year following ACLR. The investigators hypothesize that declines in muscle quality between preoperative and 1- and 6- months post-ACLR timepoints will be associated with lesser knee extensor strength, aberrant gait biomechanics, worse patient self-report and functional outcomes, and deleterious alterations in knee cartilage composition.
Specific Aim 9: To compare the effects of Standard rehabilitation vs. Vibration rehabilitation on quadriceps muscle quality. The investigators hypothesize that Vibration will produce superior outcomes compared to Standard rehabilitation, but that WBV and LMV will produce similar outcomes.
Study Design: The approach will be to recruit ACLR patients at the onset of rehabilitation and conduct a Phase II single-blind randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of standard ACLR rehabilitation (control) vs. standard rehabilitation that incorporates WBV or LMV on the study outcomes over the first year post-ACLR.
Impact: This study will evaluate the effects of a novel rehabilitation approach on factors related to the risks of PTOA and secondary ACL injury following ACLR. ACL injury risk is 10x greater in military personnel vs. civilians, and PTOA is a leading cause of medical separation from military service, degrades quality of life, increases the risks of several comorbidities (e.g. obesity), and is a primary contributor to years of life lost due to disability. Improving rehabilitation of knee injuries is paramount for maintaining the combat readiness of the armed forces and preserving the health and well-being of Service members and Veterans, as well as millions of Americans at risk of PTOA. Vibration represents a promising approach to this important challenge. Furthermore, in addition to being cost-effective, the portable nature of the prototype LMV device could have substantial implications for military personnel and US citizens, particularly those with limited access to rehabilitation facilities.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard ACL Rehabilitation
Patients will complete a 20-week supervised, progressive rehabilitation protocol directed by physical therapists at 1 of 3 participating clinics. While the specific rehabilitation exercises and techniques used for a given patient may vary depending on clinician preference/experience and patient responsiveness and progress, the general rehabilitation protocol will be standardized and follow current best practices emphasizing restoration of early weight bearing, range of motion, quadriceps function, balance, and neuromuscular control consistent with the Multicenter Orthopaedics Outcomes Network (MOON) rehabilitation protocol.
Standard ACL Rehabilitation
Patients will complete a standard of care rehabilitation emphasizing restoration of early weight bearing, range of motion, quadriceps function, balance, and neuromuscular control.
Whole Body Vibration
Patients will perform standard rehabilitation for the first month post-ACLR. At 1 month they will continue with standard rehabilitation, but will also be exposed to whole body vibration at the beginning of each session prior to rehabilitation exercises in an effort to enhance their efficacy.
Experimental: Whole Body Vibration
Whole body vibration will be delivered using a commercially available device at a frequency of 30Hz and acceleration of 2g for 1 minute a total of 6 times with 2 minutes of rest between exposures.
Local Muscle Vibration
Patients will perform standard rehabilitation for the first month post-ACLR. At 1 month they will continue with standard rehabilitation, but will also be exposed to local muscle vibration at the beginning of each session prior to rehabilitation exercises in an effort to enhance their efficacy.
Experimental: Local Muscle Vibration
Local muscle vibration will be delivered using a prototype device at a frequency of 30Hz and acceleration of 2g for 1 minute a total of 6 times with 2 minutes of rest between exposures.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Experimental: Whole Body Vibration
Whole body vibration will be delivered using a commercially available device at a frequency of 30Hz and acceleration of 2g for 1 minute a total of 6 times with 2 minutes of rest between exposures.
Experimental: Local Muscle Vibration
Local muscle vibration will be delivered using a prototype device at a frequency of 30Hz and acceleration of 2g for 1 minute a total of 6 times with 2 minutes of rest between exposures.
Standard ACL Rehabilitation
Patients will complete a standard of care rehabilitation emphasizing restoration of early weight bearing, range of motion, quadriceps function, balance, and neuromuscular control.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Unilateral, primary ACLR with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft
Exclusion Criteria
* History of prior knee surgery
* Requirement of multiple ligament surgery at time of ACLR
* Concomitant injuries or surgical procedures at the time of ACLR that would delay early post-operative weight bearing based on surgeon recommendations (e.g. lower extremity fracture, intra-articular fracture, microfracture procedure)
* Removal of more than 1/3 of the medial or lateral meniscus at the time of ACLR
* Articular cartilage damage greater than 3A on the International Cartilage Repair Society Criteria at the time of ACLR
* History of musculoskeletal injury to either leg in the 3 months prior to participation other than primary ACL injury
* Prior diagnosis of radiographic OA in any joint of the lower extremity
* History of neurological disorder (e.g. stroke, multiple sclerosis, etc.)
* Contraindications for MRI (e.g. extreme claustrophobia, cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant, metal foreign bodies, aneurism clip, etc.)
* Pregnant or planning to become pregnant
16 Years
35 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Womack Army Medical Center
FED
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Troy Blackburn, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MOTION Science Institute
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Womack Army Medical Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19-1250
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.