Expectation and Satisfaction of Implant Rehab After Jaw Surgery
NCT ID: NCT04873635
Last Updated: 2021-05-10
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Total Enrollment
31 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2003-08-31
Study Completion Date
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of implant-supported prostheses (ISP) among patients who had excised pathological jaw lesions.
Material and Methods: Patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria in a dental teaching hospital were recruited. Data pertaining to sociodemographic factors, conditions requiring surgery, surgical procedures and related complications, and types of ISP were collected. Patients' expectation and satisfaction to the ISP including oral health, self-perceived appearance, speech, chewing ability, oral comfort and ease of cleaning were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100) and global transitional scale/judgement (Likert scale). Data were analysed using t-test and chi-square tests at the significance level α=0.05.
Material and Methods: Patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria in a dental teaching hospital were recruited. Data pertaining to sociodemographic factors, conditions requiring surgery, surgical procedures and related complications, and types of ISP were collected. Patients' expectation and satisfaction to the ISP including oral health, self-perceived appearance, speech, chewing ability, oral comfort and ease of cleaning were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100) and global transitional scale/judgement (Likert scale). Data were analysed using t-test and chi-square tests at the significance level α=0.05.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Seven-year Follow-up Study of Patient Satisfaction With Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures
NCT04726540
Patient Satisfaction Using Implant Retained Overdentures
COMPLETED
3D-Printed Patient-Specific Surgical Plates Versus Conventional Surgical Plates in Jaw Reconstruction
NCT04635865
Mandibular Neoplasms
Maxillary Neoplasms
Dentofacial Deformities
RECRUITING
NA
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants (Type 1) and Early Placed Implants (Type 2)
NCT01623739
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Acquired Absence of Single Tooth
COMPLETED
NA
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement
NCT02814149
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Acquired Absence of Single Tooth
RECRUITING
NA
Clinical Success of Short Dental Implants Alone and Standard Dental Implants Combined With Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in Posterior Maxillae
NCT02350075
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Missing Teeth
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
CASE_ONLY
Study Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients who had excised pathological jaw lesions and will receive implant rehabilitation
Implant support prostheses
Intervention Type
OTHER
Implant support prostheses was provided to restore the missing teeth and tissues removed due to pathological jaw lesions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Implant support prostheses
Implant support prostheses was provided to restore the missing teeth and tissues removed due to pathological jaw lesions
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects who have received surgical removal of pathological jaw lesions in Queen Mary Hospital
* Subjects who plan to receive implant-supported prostheses in Prince Philip Dental Hospital
* Subjects who plan to receive implant-supported prostheses in Prince Philip Dental Hospital
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects with debilitating illnesses or complicating medical conditions
* Subjects who under age of 18 or unable to give consent
* Subjects with uncontrolled caries and periodontal disease
* Subjects who under age of 18 or unable to give consent
* Subjects with uncontrolled caries and periodontal disease
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Walter Y.H. Lam
Clinical Assistant Professor
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Walter Lam
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong kong
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Allen PF, O'Sullivan M, Locker D. Determining the minimally important difference for the Oral Health Impact Profile-20. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Apr;117(2):129-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00610.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Baracat LF, Teixeira AM, dos Santos MB, da Cunha Vde P, Marchini L. Patients' expectations before and evaluation after dental implant therapy. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Jun;13(2):141-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00191.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gurlek A, Miller MJ, Jacob RF, Lively JA, Schusterman MA. Functional results of dental restoration with osseointegrated implants after mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Mar;101(3):650-5; discussion 656-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199803000-00011.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Heydecke G, Thomason JM, Awad MA, Lund JP, Feine JS. Do mandibular implant overdentures and conventional complete dentures meet the expectations of edentulous patients? Quintessence Int. 2008 Nov;39(10):803-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hundepool AC, Dumans AG, Hofer SO, Fokkens NJ, Rayat SS, van der Meij EH, Schepman KP. Rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction with fibula free-flap: clinical outcome and quality of life assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Nov;37(11):1009-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.05.021. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Iizuka T, Hafliger J, Seto I, Rahal A, Mericske-Stern R, Smolka K. Oral rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction using an osteocutaneous fibula free flap with endosseous implants. Factors affecting the functional outcome in patients with oral cancer. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Feb;16(1):69-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01076.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jacobsen HC, Wahnschaff F, Trenkle T, Sieg P, Hakim SG. Oral rehabilitation with dental implants and quality of life following mandibular reconstruction with free fibular flap. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jan;20(1):187-92. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1487-3. Epub 2015 May 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Janzen JA, Silvius J, Jacobs S, Slaughter S, Dalziel W, Drummond N. What is a health expectation? Developing a pragmatic conceptual model from psychological theory. Health Expect. 2006 Mar;9(1):37-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00363.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: effect size. Restor Dent Endod. 2015 Nov;40(4):328-31. doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.328. Epub 2015 Oct 2. No abstract available.
Reference Type
RESULT
King MT. A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Apr;11(2):171-84. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.9.
Reference Type
RESULT
Kramer FJ, Dempf R, Bremer B. Efficacy of dental implants placed into fibula-free flaps for orofacial reconstruction. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Feb;16(1):80-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01040.x.
Reference Type
RESULT
Leung AC, Cheung LK. Dental implants in reconstructed jaws: patients' evaluation of functional and quality-of-life outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Jan-Feb;18(1):127-34.
Reference Type
RESULT
Li X, Zhu K, Liu F, Li H. Assessment of quality of life in giant ameloblastoma adolescent patients who have had mandible defects reconstructed with a free fibula flap. World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul 8;12:201. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-201.
Reference Type
RESULT
Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health. 1988 Mar;5(1):3-18. No abstract available.
Reference Type
RESULT
Locker D. Issues in measuring change in self-perceived oral health status. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;26(1):41-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01923.x.
Reference Type
RESULT
Nordenram G, Davidson T, Gynther G, Helgesson G, Hultin M, Jemt T, Lekholm U, Nilner K, Norlund A, Rohlin M, Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, Tranaeus S. Qualitative studies of patients' perceptions of loss of teeth, the edentulous state and prosthetic rehabilitation: a systematic review with meta-synthesis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 May-Jul;71(3-4):937-51. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2012.734421. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
Reference Type
RESULT
Ooi A, Feng J, Tan HK, Ong YS. Primary treatment of mandibular ameloblastoma with segmental resection and free fibula reconstruction: achieving satisfactory outcomes with low implant-prosthetic rehabilitation uptake. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Apr;67(4):498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
Reference Type
RESULT
Pappalardo M, Tsao CK, Tsang ML, Zheng J, Chang YM, Tsai CY. Long-term outcome of patients with or without osseointegrated implants after resection of mandibular ameloblastoma and reconstruction with vascularized bone graft: Functional assessment and quality of life. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Jul;71(7):1076-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
Reference Type
RESULT
Parbo N, Murra NT, Andersen K, Buhl J, Kiil B, Norholt SE. Outcome of partial mandibular reconstruction with fibula grafts and implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Nov;42(11):1403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
Reference Type
RESULT
Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Apr;16(2):185-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01094.x.
Reference Type
RESULT
Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tepper G. Progress and trends in patients' mindset on dental implants. I: level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Feb;22(2):223-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02035.x. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
Reference Type
RESULT
Rogers SN, Devine J, Lowe D, Shokar P, Brown JS, Vaugman ED. Longitudinal health-related quality of life after mandibular resection for oral cancer: a comparison between rim and segment. Head Neck. 2004 Jan;26(1):54-62. doi: 10.1002/hed.10351.
Reference Type
RESULT
Chang YM, Wallace CG, Hsu YM, Shen YF, Tsai CY, Wei FC. Outcome of osseointegrated dental implants in double-barrel and vertically distracted fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flaps for segmental mandibular defect reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov;134(5):1033-1043. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000623.
Reference Type
RESULT
Rustemeyer J, Bremerich A. Patients' knowledge and expectations regarding dental implants: assessment by questionnaire. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep;36(9):814-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
Reference Type
RESULT
Shpitzer T, Neligan PC, Gullane PJ, Freeman JE, Boyd BJ, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Irish JC, Gur E. Oromandibular reconstruction with the fibular free flap. Analysis of 50 consecutive flaps. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Sep;123(9):939-44. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900090051007.
Reference Type
RESULT
Tepper G, Haas R, Mailath G, Teller C, Zechner W, Watzak G, Watzek G. Representative marketing-oriented study on implants in the Austrian population. I. Level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Oct;14(5):621-33. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00916.x.
Reference Type
RESULT
Vayvada H, Mola F, Menderes A, Yilmaz M. Surgical management of ameloblastoma in the mandible: Segmental mandibulectomy and immediate reconstruction with free fibula or deep circumflex iliac artery flap (evaluation of the long-term esthetic and functional results). J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Oct;64(10):1532-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.065.
Reference Type
RESULT
Vermylen K, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL, De Bruyn H. Patient satisfaction and quality of single-tooth restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Feb;14(1):119-24. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x.
Reference Type
RESULT
Voutilainen A, Pitkaaho T, Kvist T, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. How to ask about patient satisfaction? The visual analogue scale is less vulnerable to confounding factors and ceiling effect than a symmetric Likert scale. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Apr;72(4):946-57. doi: 10.1111/jan.12875. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
Reference Type
RESULT
Yao J, Tang H, Gao XL, McGrath C, Mattheos N. Patients' expectations to dental implant: a systematic review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 29;12:153. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0153-9.
Reference Type
RESULT
Zhu J, Yang Y, Li W. Assessment of quality of life and sociocultural aspects in patients with ameloblastoma after immediate mandibular reconstruction with a fibular free flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Feb;52(2):163-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.10.012. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
Reference Type
RESULT
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ref.1/8/12d
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Validation of the Jawbone Anatomy Classification in Endosseous Dental Implant Treatment
NCT02054676
UNKNOWN
NA
3D Evaluation of the Lip Support in a Full-arch Implant-supported Rehabilitations
NCT06052501
RECRUITING
Behavioral Comparison of Three Different Graft Materials to Increase Soft Tissue Thickness Around Dental Implants.
NCT04766255
RECRUITING
PHASE4
Patient Perception and Oral Function of Implant Restorations
NCT06463405
RECRUITING
NA
Association of Implant Position and Crown Contour With Tissue Health
NCT05644470
RECRUITING
Soft Tissue Volume Gain and Stability Comparing Palate and Tuberosity
NCT03090906
UNKNOWN
NA
Patient Satisfaction and OHRQoL In Removable Versus Fixed Implant Prostheses
NCT04694209
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluation of the Aesthetic Outcomes of the Single Crowns Supported by Tissue Level Implants
NCT02061930
UNKNOWN
The Effect of Platform-Matching Versus Platform-Switching Dental Implants on Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Healing
NCT02536716
COMPLETED
NA
Artificial Intelligence Designed Single Tooth Dental Prostheses
NCT05056948
COMPLETED
Effectiveness of the Single Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture Treatment
NCT01801566
COMPLETED
NA
The Treatment of Implant-retained Mandibular Overdentures for Edentulous Patients
NCT02846805
UNKNOWN
NA
Patient Satisfaction and Retention in Implant Supported Telescopic Overdenture With Different Copings
NCT04032223
UNKNOWN
NA
Computer Assisted Implant Surgery and Immediate Loading
NCT01866696
COMPLETED
NA
Implant Rehabilitations in a Hospital Setting
NCT07332195
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Evaluating the Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation in Implant Surgery for Full Arch Prosthesis
NCT06963242
RECRUITING
NA
Differences Between Two Type Implants in Post-extraction Alveolus
NCT05665231
COMPLETED
NA
Dynamic Navigation for Zygomatic Implant Rehabilitation Using an Intraoral Reference System: Evaluation of a New Zygomatic Implant Design
NCT07124715
COMPLETED
NA
Trans-gingival or Subcrestal Short Implants Posterior Maxilla Bone Changes
NCT05975138
COMPLETED
Risk Assessment of Proximal Contact Loss Between Implant-supported Prostheses and Adjacent Teeth.
NCT06475313
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Implant Placement With Simultaneous Gum Grafting
NCT01431144
COMPLETED
NA
Patients' Satisfaction and Clinical Investigation of Removable Partial Denture Anchorage With Extracoronal Adhesive Attachments in Comparison With Clasp-retained Partial Dentures
NCT07160660
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Changes on the Interproximal Bone Level on Direct Prostheses or With Intermediate Abutments
NCT04369170
UNKNOWN
NA
Effect of Implant Position on Clinical Outcomes
NCT06166316
COMPLETED
NA
Clinical and Anatomical Factors Influencing Accuracy in Fully Guided Implant Placement.
NCT06255522
RECRUITING
NA