Intelligent Cooperation is Influenced by Learning Theories

NCT ID: NCT04851665

Last Updated: 2021-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2021-04-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Qualitative Review of Intraoperative teaching and learning

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

From manuscript draft Methods:

2.1 Setting, Participants and Data Collection In this qualitative study the investigators examined authentic examples of intraoperative teaching exchanges between attending and resident surgeons. These examples were taken from two previous studies conducted at a large women's hospital: the objectives of those studies were to compare attending and resident responses regarding avoiding intraoperative errors\[31\] and to develop the previously mentioned Intelligent Cooperation framework.\[10\] The 10 surgical cases were gynecologic, representing open abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal approaches. Surgical cases were chosen by convenience, according to the schedule of the filmographer. Participants included ten surgical attendings, four fellows, and eleven Obstetrics and Gynecology residents, ranging from PGY1 to PGY4. the investigators conducted interviews with all ten attending surgeons and five of the residents. The data for this study included the case video, deidentified transcripts of the cases, and deidentified transcripts of the interviews. Our qualitative approach was most informed by Sandelowski's concept of developing rich qualitative descriptions.\[32\]

2.2 Research Team the investigators' interdisciplinary research team consisted of a female pelvic surgeon with twenty years of surgical teaching experience (GS), a medical education researcher and educational sociologist (LA), a neurosurgeon and administrator with 30 years of experience across the continuum of medical education (SK), and a cognitive psychologist with expertise in surgical education research (EBL).

2.3 Data Analysis the investigators reviewed and discussed the works of key sociocultural learning scholars, as described in our Introduction. The discussions were converted into a list of "key tenets" of the SCLTs, with associated examples from K-12 and Higher Education. (see Table 1) the investigators then independently coded all transcripts according to the key tenets and examples from our list, noting which exchanges reflected various sociocultural theories. Counting themes was not part of the methodological approach in this study because it was inconsistent with the intent of the study to develop deep, rich, and comprehensive insights about teaching in the OR.\[33\] the investigators subsequently met as a group to review coding, convert them into themes of teaching and learning advanced surgical skills, and select notable examples from our data. (see Table 2) These themes were then transformed into instructional strategies to improve surgical teaching, based on the sociocultural theories. (see Table 3) Disagreements were settled by group discussion. Data saturation was determined according to our study objective\[34\], to identify intraoperative instructional strategies related to the social cultural learning theories. the investigators stopped analyzing transcripts when the investigators had generated no new instructional strategies.

2.4 Reflexivity and Ethics During the meetings, the investigators maintained a reflexive atmosphere, reflecting on their backgrounds, experience, and biases and how those might affect their interpretation of the data. the investigators challenged those biases often. the investigators reached consensus regarding differences in data interpretation through group discussion. The University IRB approved this study as exempt.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgical Education

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No Intervention - this was a qualitative analysis

No Intervention - this was a qualitative analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Films and transcripts from the database

Exclusion Criteria

None: the investigators will consider all films and transcripts from the database
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Missouri, Kansas City

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19-009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.