From Hardship to Hope: A Peer-led Intervention to Reduce Financial Hardship and Suicide Risk

NCT ID: NCT04840134

Last Updated: 2026-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-08

Study Completion Date

2027-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Financial hardship is an important risk factor for suicide. However, there are no evidence-based interventions to help individuals at risk for suicide to improve their financial situation. The intervention will support participants to address their financial difficulties (e.g., indebtedness, inability to meet basic needs) by coaching them to develop key financial management skills (e.g., budgeting, debt management), create a financial wellness action plan, map and activate their social networks, and connecting them with community-based financial supports (e.g., free financial counseling, publicly funded housing and food supports).

The intervention will be facilitated by trained peer coaches. The intervention will consist of three phases: (1) intensive; (2) intermediate; and (3) follow-up. The 6-week intensive phase will consist of 6 weekly group sessions and 4 one-on-one coaching sessions to navigate financial resources. The intermediate phase will consist of 3 biweekly group sessions, and either 3 biweekly or 2 monthly one-on-one coaching sessions, based on participant preference. The follow-up phase will offer 3 monthly group sessions, and either 3 monthly or 6 biweekly one-on-one coaching sessions based on participant preference. Group and one-on-one coaching sessions will be conducted remotely via a HIPAA-compliant videoconferencing platform.

This study will consist of five steps: (1) obtaining input from stakeholders to develop the intervention; (2) piloting it with a small sample of participants (n=10); (3) using this information to revise the intervention; (4) testing it in a randomized controlled trial with individuals experiencing financial hardship and suicide risk (n=96); and (5) finalizing the intervention manual.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Decades of research have shown that financial hardship is a key risk factor for suicide. Studies have consistently found higher prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide death among individuals experiencing financial hardship, such as unmanageable debts and difficulty paying for basic needs (e.g., housing, food). Stressful financial events (e.g., loss of income, evictions) are well-documented reasons for and precipitants of suicidal behavior. An increase in suicidal behavior is not only associated with objective aspects of financial hardship (e.g., number of debts, income level), but also with how hardship is experienced by individuals (e.g., financial threat, financial shame). In fact, growing evidence suggests that subjective financial hardship mediates the relationship between objective financial hardship and suicidal behavior.

Despite overwhelming evidence about the economic determinants of suicide, evidence-based interventions to reduce suicide risk and financial hardship are unavailable. Suicide prevention interventions at the individual level have largely focused on identifying or treating symptoms of psychiatric distress and other immediate clinical factors. Ecological-level interventions have mostly focused on increasing suicide awareness and reducing access to the means of suicide.

To address this gap, our project aims to develop a peer-led intervention that includes strategies and tools to reduce objective and subjective financial hardship, with the goal of decreasing hopelessness, shame, and depression (risk factors for suicide), increasing hope and life satisfaction (protective factors for suicide), and thereby reducing suicidal ideation and behaviors.

The main outcome of this study will be a manualized intervention to lessen financial hardship as a risk factor for suicidal ideation and behavior. If the findings of this study support its feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, and initial efficacy, the investigators will formalize a peer coach training program, further develop an intervention fidelity measure, and pursue a randomized controlled trial to test intervention efficacy.

Specific aims and hypotheses are as follows:

1. With multi-stakeholder input, develop and iteratively revise From Hardship to Hope, a peer-led financial empowerment intervention with group and individual components to reduce SI/behaviors and financial hardship.
2. Assess the feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction of the intervention using qualitative and quantitative methods.
3. Examine its initial efficacy by regular evaluations over 24 weeks on suicidal ideation (SI) severity and intensity, objective and subjective financial hardship, protective factors of suicide (e.g., hope, life satisfaction), and risk factors of suicide (e.g., hopelessness, depression). We hypothesize that, compared to the control arm, the intervention arm will show greater reductions in SI severity and intensity, hopelessness, and objective and subjective financial hardship, and greater increases in financial self-efficacy and hope from baseline to 24 weeks.
4. Explore the intervention's mechanisms of action (e.g., level of participation, subjective financial hardship). We hypothesize that the amount of change in SI severity and intensity will be positively correlated with the change in subjective financial hardship, and both will be associated with the level of participation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hope Suicide Suicide Ideation Suicidal Behavior Financial Stress

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of From Hardship to Hope (FHH) using a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The intervention arm will receive a 24-week peer-led financial wellness program in addition to clinical care with a licensed mental health clinician. The control arm will receive enhanced treatment as usual (eTAU), consisting of clinical care with a licensed mental health clinician plus information about financial wellness resources (a Financial Wellness Navigator and financial counseling handout).
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

From Hardship to Hope: Financial Wellness Intervention

Experimental: Participants in the experimental arm will receive "From Hardship to Hope, A Peer-led intervention to reduce financial hardship and suicide risk." The intervention will support individuals experiencing financial hardship and suicide risk to address their financial difficulties (e.g., debt, inability to meet basic needs) by coaching them on financial management techniques, facilitating a financial wellness plan, and connecting them with community-based financial supports (e.g., free financial counseling). The intervention will be facilitated by trained peer coaches, who are individuals with lived experience of financial hardship and suicidal ideation or suicidal behaviors who are state certified peer specialists (having met formal training and experience requirements).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

From Hardship to Hope: A Peer-led intervention to reduce financial hardship and suicide risk

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention will be delivered in three consecutive phases:

1. Intensive Intervention Phase (weeks 1 to 6), consisting of 6 weekly group sessions and 4 one-on-one coaching sessions to navigate financial resources.
2. Intermediate Phase (weeks 7 to 12), consisting of 3 biweekly group sessions, and either 3 biweekly or 2 monthly one-on-one coaching sessions, based on participant preference.
3. Follow up Phase (weeks 13 to 24), consisting of 3 monthly group sessions, and either 3 monthly or 6 biweekly one-on-one coaching sessions based on participant preference.

Key intervention components:

1. Peer-led group sessions
2. Individual peer coaching sessions to complement group sessions

Control Arm

The control arm will receive enhanced treatment as usual (eTAU), consisting of clinical care with a licensed mental health clinician plus information about financial wellness resources (a Financial Wellness Navigator and financial counseling handout). The Financial Wellness Navigator is a curated document providing information about financial wellness resources available to New Yorkers (e.g., brief description of the service, eligibility criteria, website for more information, contact information). This directory will be provided via email, online link, and/or post mail, depending on participant preference.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Enhanced Treatment as Usual (eTAU)

Intervention Type OTHER

Enhanced Treatment as Usual (eTAU) consists of ongoing clinical care with a licensed mental health clinician, representing the current standard of care, plus provision of financial wellness informational resources. These resources include a Financial Wellness Navigator (a curated directory of financial wellness services available to New Yorkers) and a handout describing free financial counseling services and how to access them. The control condition does not include peer-led group sessions, individualized peer coaching, or warm referrals that are part of the From Hardship to Hope intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

From Hardship to Hope: A Peer-led intervention to reduce financial hardship and suicide risk

The intervention will be delivered in three consecutive phases:

1. Intensive Intervention Phase (weeks 1 to 6), consisting of 6 weekly group sessions and 4 one-on-one coaching sessions to navigate financial resources.
2. Intermediate Phase (weeks 7 to 12), consisting of 3 biweekly group sessions, and either 3 biweekly or 2 monthly one-on-one coaching sessions, based on participant preference.
3. Follow up Phase (weeks 13 to 24), consisting of 3 monthly group sessions, and either 3 monthly or 6 biweekly one-on-one coaching sessions based on participant preference.

Key intervention components:

1. Peer-led group sessions
2. Individual peer coaching sessions to complement group sessions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Enhanced Treatment as Usual (eTAU)

Enhanced Treatment as Usual (eTAU) consists of ongoing clinical care with a licensed mental health clinician, representing the current standard of care, plus provision of financial wellness informational resources. These resources include a Financial Wellness Navigator (a curated directory of financial wellness services available to New Yorkers) and a handout describing free financial counseling services and how to access them. The control condition does not include peer-led group sessions, individualized peer coaching, or warm referrals that are part of the From Hardship to Hope intervention.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Working age (Self-reported age between 18-64).
* Provides informed consent (Self report: individual signs and dates Informed Consent Form).
* Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study (Self report).
* Lives or works in NYC (Self-report).
* Willing to receive referral to financial counseling (Self report).
* Objective financial hardship (Reports one or more types of financial hardship on the Financial Wellness Tool (FwTool), an 11-item assessment that measures overall financial hardship, food insecurity, housing hardship, difficulty paying for utilities, medical hardship, and indebtedness).
* Subjective financial hardship (Reports a Financial Threat score of 13 or higher \[5-25\] on the Financial Threat Scale (FTS), five-item scale that measures worry, fear, uncertainty, and preoccupation about one's financial situation).
* Moderate-to-high suicide risk as measured by the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C- SSRS) Screener administered by trained research staff (Endorses active suicidal ideation with or without a method or with some intent (items 2, 3, 4 on the C-SSRS) in the past 3 months, OR suicidal ideation with a plan or suicidal behavior (5 or 6 on the C-SSRS) in the past 3 months but NOT in the past month, confirmed by the study clinician during psychiatric evaluation).
* Receiving clinical treatment (Self-reports as currently enrolled in therapy or otherwise receiving treatment from a licensed mental health clinician; alternatively, willing to begin mental health treatment prior to the start of the intervention. Study participants will be asked to provide the name, phone number and email address for the treating clinician).
* Willing to participate in a financial wellness intervention via HIPAA-compliant videoconference platform (Self-report).
* Internet connection and video-capable device to participate in group sessions via HIPAA-compliant videoconference platform (Self-report).

Exclusion Criteria

* Active SI with plan and intent in the past month (C-SSRS Screener administered by research staff and confirmed by study clinician (Yes to item 5, i.e., active suicidal ideation with plan and intent in the past month)).
* Recent suicidal behavior within the past month (C-SSRS Screener administered by research staff and confirmed by study clinician (Yes to item 6, i.e., has engaged in suicidal behaviors in the past month)).
* Florid psychosis or acute intoxication in need of detoxification (Clinical assessment by licensed study clinician during clinical evaluation).
* Cognitive impairment for those over age 60 (Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Blind Version (MoCA) conducted by research staff for those over age 60. (MoCA score below 19)).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American Foundation for Suicide Prevention

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baltic Street Wellness Solutions

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

New York State Psychiatric Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Oscar Jimenez-Solomon, PhD., MPH

Assistant Director, New York State Center of Excellence for Cultural Competence

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oscar G Jimenez-Solomon, PhD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

New York State Psychiatric Institute

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

8078

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.