Insertable Cardiac Monitor for Primary Atrial Fibrillation Detection in High-Risk Heart Failure Patients

NCT ID: NCT04818645

Last Updated: 2025-03-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

477 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-31

Study Completion Date

2028-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with heart failure (HF) represent a large population of patients who are at high risk for complications related to undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). However, currently there are limited modalities for early AF detection and subsequent stroke prevention in this high-risk population. An implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) is inserted subcutaneously and can provide long term arrhythmia information via remote monitoring.

The ASSERT-AF study seeks to accurately define the burden of AF and other arrhythmias in high-risk HF patients using an ASSERT ICM.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over 6 million people in the United States suffer from heart failure (HF). By the year 2030 the prevalence of HF is expected to exceed 8 million people. Heart failure accounts for 1 million hospital admissions each year, costing our economy in excess of $30 billion dollars per year. Mortality in patients with HF remains high, and nearly half of all patients diagnosed with HF will die within 5 years. More than half of all patients admitted with HF decompensation have preserved left ventricular systolic function. Patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved left ventricular systolic function are at high risk for developing atrial fibrillation (AF), the occurrence of which often contributes to HF decompensation and increases morbidity and all-cause mortality. Similarly, patients with AF are at high risk for developing HF due to loss of atrio-ventricular synchrony and rapid uncontrolled ventricular rates. Detection of AF can be challenging and may go undiagnosed in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients through conventional monitoring methods. Patients with HF represent a large population who are at risk for complications related to undiagnosed AF. AF increases the risk of stroke five-fold and the risk of death nearly two-fold. Moreover, strokes related to AF are twice as likely to be fatal or severely disabling compared to strokes due to other causes, such as ischemic small vessel disease or atheromatous large vessel disease. Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), can be used for the early detection of AF in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with HF. However, current guidelines provide an indication for prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) only in HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, whereas there are limited data for device-based detection of AF in HF patients with more preserved LVEF.

Implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) are devices that can be injected into the subcutaneous tissue and can provide automatic electrocardiographic recordings of asymptomatic arrhythmias as well as patient triggered electrocardiographic recordings of symptomatic episodes during long term follow-up. Implantable cardiac monitors are be paired with remote monitoring systems, capable of rapid remote review of electrograms. Accordingly, we hypothesize that a management strategy that incorporates ICM implantation in patients with HF and LVEF \>35% will result in a significantly higher rate of AF detection leading to arrhythmia related interventions compared to conventional monitoring and follow-up in patients with HF.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to undergo implant of an ASSERT ICM implant with remote monitoring and symptom-triggered mobile app transmissions versus conventional follow-up without an ICM. Randomization will be stratified by the degree of LV dysfunction to ensure balanced enrollment of HF subjects with mild LV dysfunction (LVEF = 36%-49%) and those with preserved LVEF (≥ 50% \[i.e. heart failure with preserved ejection fraction - HFpEF\]).
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Events Review Committee: A blinded three-member Events Review Committee will review de-identified source documents obtained from each of the enrolling sites that will only be labelled with a subject ID. No data will be provided indicating the randomized treatment arm to the study and appropriately redacted with no ICM data provided. The information will be used to determine the nature of any clinical and adverse events. Available medical records and source documents will be used to determine cause-specific mortality.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ASSERT insertable cardiac monitor

The ASSERT implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) is an FDA-approved device that can be injected into the subcutaneous tissue and can provide automatic as well as patient triggered electrocardiographic recordings of symptomatic episodes during long term follow-up. This Implantable cardiac monitor is paired with a remote monitoring smartphone application called My Merlin that capable of rapid remote review of electrograms to be utilized in this study for arrhythmia detection. The ASSERT ICM is indicated for the monitoring and diagnostic evaluation of patients who experience unexplained symptoms such as: dizziness, palpitations, chest pain, syncope, and shortness of breath, as well as patients who are at risk for cardiac arrhythmias. It is also indicated for patients who have been previously diagnosed with atrial fibrillation or who are susceptible to developing atrial fibrillation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ASSERT Insertable Cardiac Monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects will be subcutaneously implanted with an Abbott ASSERT ICM with the device implant procedure per standard of care and current labelling. Data related to subjects' arrhythmias, via the Merlin.net Patient CareNetwork will be transmitted on a monthly basis to the treating physician and subsequently to the study coordination and database center (CCRC) at the University of Rochester. Data on the frequency/types of symptomatic (patient triggered) versus ICM detected (asymptomatic) arrhythmic events will be collected and adjudicated. Clinical data on medication, device interventions, cardiovascular events will be collected at follow-up visits.

Conventional Management

The conventional management arm will use arrhythmia signs and symptoms to determine occurrence of arrhythmias.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Management and monitoring

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects randomized to the conventional management arm of the trial will undergo arrhythmia monitoring based on clinical indications and per standard available modalities including periodic electrocardiograms (ECG), Holter and/or event monitoring.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ASSERT Insertable Cardiac Monitor

Subjects will be subcutaneously implanted with an Abbott ASSERT ICM with the device implant procedure per standard of care and current labelling. Data related to subjects' arrhythmias, via the Merlin.net Patient CareNetwork will be transmitted on a monthly basis to the treating physician and subsequently to the study coordination and database center (CCRC) at the University of Rochester. Data on the frequency/types of symptomatic (patient triggered) versus ICM detected (asymptomatic) arrhythmic events will be collected and adjudicated. Clinical data on medication, device interventions, cardiovascular events will be collected at follow-up visits.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Management and monitoring

Subjects randomized to the conventional management arm of the trial will undergo arrhythmia monitoring based on clinical indications and per standard available modalities including periodic electrocardiograms (ECG), Holter and/or event monitoring.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female patients more than 18 years of age (no upper age limit)
* HF exacerbation requiring initiation or augmentation of decongestive therapy in a hospital setting (hospitalization or emergency department visit) during the past 24 calendar months prior to consent date OR current treatment with loop-diuretics (furosemide, bumetanide, or torsemide).
* LVEF \> 35% on a cardiac imaging study (echocardiogram, nuclear imaging, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging) performed during the past 24 calendar months prior to consent date
* One or more FDA-approved indications for an Abbott ICM (unexplained symptoms such as: dizziness, palpitations, chest pain, syncope, and shortness of breath, as well as patients who are at risk for cardiac arrhythmias).
* Willing to undergo an Abbott ICM implant and agree to remote ICM monitoring.

Exclusion Criteria

* Existing implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), biventricular ICD, implantable cardiac monitor or pacemaker.
* Known or documented history AF or atrial flutter any time in past.
* Has had a heart transplant
* Participation in other clinical trials (observational registries are allowed with approval from the Coordination Center)
* Unable or unwilling to cooperate with the protocol
* Unable or unwilling to sign the consent for participation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Rochester

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ilan Goldenberg

Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ilan Goldenberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Rochester

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Rochester Medical Center

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ilan Goldenberg, MD

Role: CONTACT

585-275-5391

Nicole Guerrero, MBA

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, Singer DE. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2370-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2370.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11343485 (View on PubMed)

Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am J Cardiol. 1998 Oct 16;82(8A):2N-9N. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00583-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9809895 (View on PubMed)

Lin HJ, Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser AS, Kase CS, Benjamin EJ, D'Agostino RB. Stroke severity in atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Study. Stroke. 1996 Oct;27(10):1760-4. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.10.1760.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8841325 (View on PubMed)

Colilla S, Crow A, Petkun W, Singer DE, Simon T, Liu X. Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the U.S. adult population. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;112(8):1142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.063. Epub 2013 Jul 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23831166 (View on PubMed)

Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Tsang TS. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):119-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595140. Epub 2006 Jul 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16818816 (View on PubMed)

Lin HJ, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Belanger AJ, D'Agostino RB. Newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation and acute stroke. The Framingham Study. Stroke. 1995 Sep;26(9):1527-30. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.9.1527.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7660392 (View on PubMed)

Anter E, Jessup M, Callans DJ. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure: treatment considerations for a dual epidemic. Circulation. 2009 May 12;119(18):2516-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.821306. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19433768 (View on PubMed)

Trulock KM, Narayan SM, Piccini JP. Rhythm control in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation: contemporary challenges including the role of ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 19;64(7):710-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1169.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25125304 (View on PubMed)

Maisel WH, Stevenson LW. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and rationale for therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2003 Mar 20;91(6A):2D-8D. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03373-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12670636 (View on PubMed)

Pellicori P, Urbinati A, Kaur K, Zhang J, Shah P, Kazmi S, Capucci A, Cleland JGF, Clark AL. Prevalence and Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Ambulatory Patients With Heart Failure. Am J Cardiol. 2019 Nov 15;124(10):1554-1560. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.018. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31558271 (View on PubMed)

Ducharme A, Swedberg K, Pfeffer MA, Cohen-Solal A, Granger CB, Maggioni AP, Michelson EL, McMurray JJ, Olsson L, Rouleau JL, Young JB, Olofsson B, Puu M, Yusuf S; CHARM Investigators. Prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure by candesartan in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. Am Heart J. 2006 Jul;152(1):86-92.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16838426 (View on PubMed)

Reiffel JA, Verma A, Kowey PR, Halperin JL, Gersh BJ, Wachter R, Pouliot E, Ziegler PD; REVEAL AF Investigators. Incidence of Previously Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation Using Insertable Cardiac Monitors in a High-Risk Population: The REVEAL AF Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1120-1127. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3180.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28842973 (View on PubMed)

Beinart SC, Natale A, Verma A, Amin A, Kasner S, Diener HC, Pouliot E, Franco N, Mittal S. Real-World Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Insertable Cardiac Monitor Procedures. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Aug;39(8):837-42. doi: 10.1111/pace.12886. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27198480 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00007311

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.