Comparison of Stabilization Exercises Versus Thrust Manipulation Technique on Pelvic Girdle Pain.

NCT ID: NCT04818411

Last Updated: 2021-04-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-18

Study Completion Date

2020-07-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this research is to compare the efficacy of stabilization exercise versus pelvic girdle pain thrust manipulation technique in females with postpartum pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pelvic-girdle pain is a mechanical disorder growing rapidly as a consequence of changing delivery pattern and changing lifestyle. Medication with synthetic drugs not only has been unable to effectively curtail the spread of this disease conditions but also is most of the times linked with co-occurring side-effects. The exercise and manual therapy-based approach could lead in reducing the functional limitations and morbidity rate in females with the postpartum pain. This research could also help in spreading the awareness globally, to Prenatal and Postnatal Hospital Caregivers.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Girdle Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises

Stabilization exercises

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises

Intervention Type OTHER

The program was based on specific training of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles with coactivation of the lumbar multifidus at the lumbosacral region, training of the gluteus maximus, the latissimus dorsi, the oblique abdominal muscles, the erector spinae, the quadratus lumborum, and the hip adductors and abductors. Initially, we focused on the specific contraction of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles. After approximately 2 weeks, loading was progressively increased throughout the intervention period. The women were required to exercise for 30 to 60 minutes, 3 days a week, for 3-4 weeks.

Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation

High-velocity thrust manipulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation

Intervention Type OTHER

: For high-velocity thrust technique, a modified Chicago technique was used. For this procedure, the lumbopelvic region was targeted. The side to be treated was chosen, based on the subject's report of her most symptomatic side. The physical therapist, performed passively side bend the subject toward the painful side, rotate the upper body in the direction opposite to the side bending, and then deliver a quick posterior and inferior thrust at a grade V including a small-amplitude/high-velocity therapeutic movement. A maximum of 2 attempts per side was permitted if no pop was heard following the first attempt. If the subject showed improvement of 50% or less after the first treatment, the intervention was categorized as a failure, the examination and intervention were repeated, and the subjects were asked to return 2 to 4 days later. If the subject showed greater than 50% improvement, the intervention was categorized as a success, and study participation was concluded.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises

The program was based on specific training of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles with coactivation of the lumbar multifidus at the lumbosacral region, training of the gluteus maximus, the latissimus dorsi, the oblique abdominal muscles, the erector spinae, the quadratus lumborum, and the hip adductors and abductors. Initially, we focused on the specific contraction of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles. After approximately 2 weeks, loading was progressively increased throughout the intervention period. The women were required to exercise for 30 to 60 minutes, 3 days a week, for 3-4 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation

: For high-velocity thrust technique, a modified Chicago technique was used. For this procedure, the lumbopelvic region was targeted. The side to be treated was chosen, based on the subject's report of her most symptomatic side. The physical therapist, performed passively side bend the subject toward the painful side, rotate the upper body in the direction opposite to the side bending, and then deliver a quick posterior and inferior thrust at a grade V including a small-amplitude/high-velocity therapeutic movement. A maximum of 2 attempts per side was permitted if no pop was heard following the first attempt. If the subject showed improvement of 50% or less after the first treatment, the intervention was categorized as a failure, the examination and intervention were repeated, and the subjects were asked to return 2 to 4 days later. If the subject showed greater than 50% improvement, the intervention was categorized as a success, and study participation was concluded.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Post-partum females with the normal vaginal delivery present with pelvic girdle pain before the next conception.

* Aged between 18 and 45
* Posterior pelvic girdle pain located distal and/or lateral to the L5-S1
* Pain onset during pregnancy or within 3 weeks after delivery, most recent delivery within 6 to 16 weeks
* Positive posterior pelvic pain provocation (P4) test

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients presenting with the history of:

* Back pain indicating radiculopathy
* Mechanical back pain
* Back pain due to disc herniation
* Rheumatological diseases
* Neurological illness or recent surgery
* Women who have gone through C-section
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maryam Shabbir, PhD*

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Riphah Rehabilitation Center

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bastiaanssen JM, de Bie RA, Bastiaenen CH, Essed GG, van den Brandt PA. A historical perspective on pregnancy-related low back and/or pelvic girdle pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 May 1;120(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15866079 (View on PubMed)

Bergstrom C, Persson M, Mogren I. Sick leave and healthcare utilisation in women reporting pregnancy related low back pain and/or pelvic girdle pain at 14 months postpartum. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Feb 15;24:7. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0088-9. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26885363 (View on PubMed)

Vermani E, Mittal R, Weeks A. Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. Pain Pract. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):60-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00327.x. Epub 2010 Oct 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19863747 (View on PubMed)

Robinson HS, Eskild A, Heiberg E, Eberhard-Gran M. Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: the impact on function. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(2):160-4. doi: 10.1080/00016340500410024.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16532908 (View on PubMed)

Bergstrom C, Persson M, Nergard KA, Mogren I. Prevalence and predictors of persistent pelvic girdle pain 12 years postpartum. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 16;18(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1760-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28915804 (View on PubMed)

Eggen MH, Stuge B, Mowinckel P, Jensen KS, Hagen KB. Can supervised group exercises including ergonomic advice reduce the prevalence and severity of low back pain and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy? A randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;92(6):781-90. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110119. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22282770 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB-UOL-FAHS/659 Anam Naz

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.