Pilot Study of Sex-matched vs. Sex-mismatched Red Blood Cell Transfusion

NCT ID: NCT04814264

Last Updated: 2023-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

270 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-07

Study Completion Date

2023-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Blood transfusion is common for patients in hospital, especially for those in intensive care. Patients receive blood that is matched to them based on their blood group (A, B, AB, O), but not based on sex. This means male or female patients may receive male or female blood. There is some evidence to suggest that giving male patients female blood and female patients male blood (sex-mismatched blood) may be harmful. The investigators think giving males only male blood and females only female blood (sex-matched blood) will be better for the patients and improve their survival. To test this, the study team will randomly give 50% of intensive care patients who require blood only sex-mismatched blood and 50% of intensive care patients only sex-matched blood for their entire hospital stay. Then, health data of patients will be collected to see if either group does better after transfusion. Before this is done as a large study with thousands of patients, it will be attempted as a smaller pilot study with a few hundred patients to be sure the processes suggested make sense and are possible for hospitals and for the blood supplier to follow.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Blood transfusion is one of the most common procedures performed during hospitalization. Approximately 85 million red blood cell (RBC) units are transfused globally each year. RBC units are matched for blood groups but matching for other donor characteristics such as sex, is not considered. By the current standard of care, female or male patients can receive RBCs from male or female donors. However, accumulating data suggests that sex-mismatched transfusions may be harmful.

Sex-mismatched transfusions and transplantations have been associated with poor outcomes. Plasma from female donors is associated with an increased risk of transfusion related acute lung injury (TRALI); sex-mismatched heart transplantation is associated with increased transplant-associated mortality; and stem cell transplants from female donors are associated with worse outcomes.

Anemia is common during critical illness and 20-40% of critically ill patients require a mean of two to five RBC units during admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Once a patient receives more than six RBC units, virtually all patients (\>97%) will have received at least one sex-mismatched RBC. The population of transfused ICU adult patients is already at high risk of death, with a demonstrated 90-day all-cause mortality of 35-37% based on the ABLE study, and in-hospital mortality of 24-34% (institutional data). Thus, new supportive care strategies are needed to improve outcomes of this highly vulnerable patient group.

Transfusion data linked to donor sex spanning a 6-year period was previously analyzed. Using a careful analysis that controlled for covariates and stratified on time-dependent and fixed variables, 25,219 transfusion recipients were retrospectively analyzed and a significant association between male to female RBC transfusions and death \[hazard ratio (HR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.69\] was found. A trend towards higher mortality was also noted with female to male RBCs (HR 1.13: 95% CI 0.92-1.39), and with sex-mismatched vs. sex-matched RBCs overall (HR 1.23: 95% CI 1.04-1.45). These findings suggest that matching RBC transfusions for sex can reduce mortality in ICU patients.

The investigators hypothesize that donor-recipient sex-matched RBC transfusions are associated with improved survival in hospital compared to sex-mismatched RBC transfusions. Sex-matched RBC transfusions may represent an important, readily implementable advance in supportive care of critically ill patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blood Transfusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Multicentre, pilot randomized controlled trial.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The blood bank staff will be blinded to the treatment allocation schedule and the use of random block sizes in the allocation schedule will ensure that they are not aware of which treatment will be assigned next. The clinical staff will be blinded to the intervention. The study biostatistician will be blinded to treatment allocation for any analyses performed.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sex-matched red blood cell transfusion

All patients will receive red blood cells (RBCs) that are ABO and Rh compatible as per routine blood bank practices. In addition to routine compatibility, subjects in this arm will receive blood that is matched to their sex (donor and recipient sex are the same). Patients in this arm will receive RBCs matched to their sex until discharge from hospital or death.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Red blood cells

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

All transfused red blood cells will be obtained from Canadian Blood Services and will be the standard red blood cell products currently provided in Canada.

Sex-mismatched red blood cell transfusion

All patients will receive red blood cells (RBCs) that are ABO and Rh compatible as per routine blood bank practices. In addition to routine compatibility, subjects in this arm will receive blood that is not matched to their sex (donor and recipient sex are not the same). Patients in this arm will receive RBCs mismatched to their sex until discharge from hospital or death.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Red blood cells

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

All transfused red blood cells will be obtained from Canadian Blood Services and will be the standard red blood cell products currently provided in Canada.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Red blood cells

All transfused red blood cells will be obtained from Canadian Blood Services and will be the standard red blood cell products currently provided in Canada.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (age ≥18)
* Admitted to the intensive care unit
* Requiring a red blood cell transfusion

Exclusion Criteria

* Requiring a specific red blood cell unit or unit not readily available (e.g., phenotypically matched, rare blood, washed, complex red blood cell antibodies, etc.)
* Massively bleeding (i.e. ≥4 units of blood ordered, or Massive Hemorrhage Protocol initiated, or an urgent blood request made)
* Biological sex unknown
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

McMaster University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michelle Zeller

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michelle Zeller, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McMaster University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hamilton General Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kingston Health Sciences Centre

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Radford M, Estcourt LJ, Sirotich E, Pitre T, Britto J, Watson M, Brunskill SJ, Fergusson DA, Doree C, Arnold DM. Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem cell support. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 23;5(5):CD011305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011305.pub3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38780066 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Sex_MATTERS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.