Effectiveness of 10-minute Chair Massage Versus 10-minute Break to Reduce Stress and Improve Well-being

NCT ID: NCT04787107

Last Updated: 2023-03-28

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 36 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2021-08-30
• Study Completion Date: 2023-02-28

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of 10-minute chair massage therapy in comparison to a scheduled 10-minute break to evaluate the impact on perceived quality of life, heart rate, blood pressure, and pain scale in healthcare workers.

Detailed Description

The primary purpose of this study is to provide cost-effective interventions for nursing personnel aimed at reducing fatigue and stress within their work environment while improving their overall quality of life. Studies have demonstrated that stress management resources and overall engagement of staff lead to quality outcomes for both staff and patients. There is limited research that examines interventions that can reduce stress perception in nursing. This study will examine the physical and psychological impact of 10-minute massage therapy in comparison to a 10-minute scheduled break weekly over a period of 5 weeks. If the outcomes of the study indicate that either massage therapy or scheduled breaks are an effective intervention for management of stressful situations and improving quality of life, the overall goal would be to create relaxation rooms on more nursing units that allow staff to engage in massage therapy or scheduled rest sessions to reduce stressful work situations.

Studies have indicated that healthcare workers experience high levels of work-related stress that include individual, social, occupational and environmental factors. Unrelieved or mismanaged stressors contribute to a variety of health-related consequences including disturbances in the digestive system, headaches, sleep disturbances, hypertension, fatigue and psychological issues, including anxiety. Massage therapy and scheduled breaks have been identified as potential interventions to mitigate or reduce stress. The use of mechanical massage has been shown to mimic the effects of traditional physical massage in terms of reducing stress and anxiety of the end-users. Mechanical massages have an advantage over physical massages since they are more cost-effective, can be used when convenient, and within a controlled environment. The literature supports that massage therapy can have an impact on reducing stress, anxiety, depression, and pain, while enhancing an individual's immune function, relaxation, and overall well-being. Studies have also indicated that nurses often lack opportunities to take breaks during their scheduled shifts. In many instances, staff sacrifice their breaks in order to fulfill patient-care duties. This study will compare both massage therapy and scheduled breaks to examine the overall impact on healthcare workers.

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased workplace stressors for healthcare workers; however, there is limited evidence to support successful interventions to manage these stressors.

Conditions

Stress, Psychological; Fatigue; Quality of Life

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: PREVENTION
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

10 Minute Chair Massage

Chair massage for 10 minutes once a week for 5 weeks

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Mechanical Chair Massage

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Healthcare staff will be placed into either massage or break intervention

10 Minute Scheduled Break

Scheduled 10-minute break once a week for 5 weeks

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Mechanical Chair Massage

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Healthcare staff will be placed into either massage or break intervention

Interventions

Mechanical Chair Massage

Healthcare staff will be placed into either massage or break intervention

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Schedule Break

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Health care professional assigned work duties on designed unit
• Men and women able age 18-84 able to give informed consent
• Able to speak and understand English

Exclusion Criteria

• Individuals that decline to participate in the study
• Individuals currently on work restrictions
• Recent head, neck, shoulder or back surgeries

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 84 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Tami Underhill

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Geisinger Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Sarah A. Evans

Director of Nursing Research

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Geisinger

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Countries

United States

Other Identifiers

2021-0186

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id