30-Days Post-Operative Complications in Bariatric Surgery
NCT ID: NCT04779723
Last Updated: 2021-03-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
116 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-13
2019-10-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of a Modified Cost-Effective Dietary Plan in Promoting Weight Loss and Preservation of Lean Body Mass in Patients After Bariatric Surgery
NCT07111767
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Short Term Follow up
NCT03465956
Durability of Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery
NCT04650373
Omentopexy After Sleeve Gastrectomy in Children and Adolescences.
NCT06811623
Complications After Bariatric Surgery Based, a Questionnaire Survey
NCT01930851
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LRYGB Procedure
LRYGB technique was performed by placing 4 to 6 trocars, a 150 cm ante-colic Roux-limb gastric pouch (30 to 50 ml) was created with linear stapled or circular stapled gastro-jejunostomy, a 50-cm long biliopancreatic limb was chosen. A passive drainage was kept near to the gastro-jejunostomy.
Comparison of two Techniques of bariatric surgery
We compared the 30 days outcomes in patients who underwent LSG procedure with those who underwent LRYGB
LSG Procedure
35 Fr bougie was used for the calibration of a gastric tube. 3 to 6 cm of longitudinal incision of the stomach was done at pylorus to the angle of His. Using of absorbable suture, the staple line was sewn.
Comparison of two Techniques of bariatric surgery
We compared the 30 days outcomes in patients who underwent LSG procedure with those who underwent LRYGB
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Comparison of two Techniques of bariatric surgery
We compared the 30 days outcomes in patients who underwent LSG procedure with those who underwent LRYGB
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* body mass index (BMI) \>35 kg/m2 (Morbidly obese)
* Patients with failed conservative treatment of weight control
Exclusion Criteria
* Conversion of another bariatric procedure
* Large hiatal hernia
* Patients with inflammatory bowel disease
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Multan Medical And Dental College
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Manzar Ali
Consultant General and laparoscopic Surgeon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Multan Medical and Dental College
Multan, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gallagher EJ, LeRoith D, Karnieli E. The metabolic syndrome--from insulin resistance to obesity and diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;37(3):559-79, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2008.05.002.
Chooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism. 2019 Mar;92:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
Siddiqui M, Hameed R, Nadeem M, Mohammad T, Simbak N, Latif A, et al. Obesity in Pakistan; current and future perceptions. J Curr Trends Biomed Eng Biosci. 2018;17:001-004
Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, Kolotkin RL, LaMonte MJ, Pendleton RC, Strong MB, Vinik R, Wanner NA, Hopkins PN, Gress RE, Walker JM, Cloward TV, Nuttall RT, Hammoud A, Greenwood JL, Crosby RD, McKinlay R, Simper SC, Smith SC, Hunt SC. Health benefits of gastric bypass surgery after 6 years. JAMA. 2012 Sep 19;308(11):1122-31. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11164.
Suter M, Donadini A, Romy S, Demartines N, Giusti V. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: significant long-term weight loss, improvement of obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life. Ann Surg. 2011 Aug;254(2):267-73. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182263b66.
Li K, Gao F, Xue H, Jiang Q, Wang Y, Shen Q, Tian Y, Yang Y. Comparative study on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastric bypass for treatment of morbid obesity patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Mar-Apr;61(130):319-22.
Peterli R, Borbely Y, Kern B, Gass M, Peters T, Thurnheer M, Schultes B, Laederach K, Bueter M, Schiesser M. Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2013 Nov;258(5):690-4; discussion 695. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a67426.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MMDC-2018-023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.