Preeclampsia Sequential Screening Using Angiogenic Factors During First Trimester of Pregnancy
NCT ID: NCT04767438
Last Updated: 2021-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
6560 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-03-31
2022-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This is a prospective, multicentre, cohort study, with the collaboration of Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona), Hospital Universitario de Cruces (Bilbao), Hospital Son Llàtzer (Mallorca) and Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa (Zaragoza). Women with a singleton pregnancy attending to the 12-week ultrasound scan at one of the maternity hospitals participating in the study between March 1st 2021 and 30th October 2021 will be recruited. Patients who accept to participate in the study will be classified into three risk groups (low-risk, moderate-risk and high risk) based on medical history, Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A (PAPP-A) and Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index (UTPI). Placental Growth Factor (PlGF) will only be determined in those patients classified as intermediate risk after this first step and then reclassified in high and low-risk patients depending on its values. The number of first-trimester scans performed by these hospitals is approximately 8200 patients annually. Due to PE prevalence in our environment is around 3% of the total population, a total of 246 cases of PE are to be expected. Therefore, based on similar previous experiences, we could assume that 80% of the patients will accept to participate in the study, meaning a total sample of 6560 pregnant women.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Women's Perspective on First-trimester Preeclampsia Screening
NCT05123560
Early Prediction of Preeclampsia Using arteriaL Stiffness in High-risk prEgnancies
NCT04783597
A Study to Evaluate the Use of Placenta Protein 13 (PP13) in the First Trimester of Pregnancy as a Diagnostic Aiding Tool in the Assessment of the Risk for Developing Preeclampsia in Women With Low and Unknown Risk
NCT00572793
sFlt1/PlGF and Planned Delivery to Prevent Preeclampsia at Term.
NCT04766866
Molecular Study of the Maternal-fetal Interface in Preeclampsia.
NCT06232668
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Low risk of PE (\<1/500)
* Intermediate risk of PE (between 1/50 and 1/500)
* High risk of PE (\>1/50) In those patients classified as intermediate and high-risk, PlGF and s-Flt-1 will be determined from the blood samples kept in biobanks of each hospital according to the current legislation. SFlt-1 results will be analyzed at the end of the study in order to decrease the cost because there will not be used to make clinical decisions. PlGF in high-risk patients will not be considered either to reclassify those patients. In both cases, the diagnostic efficiency will be analyzed at the end of the study.
Patients in the intermediate-risk group (1/50-1/500) will be reclassified after adding PlGF levels in the predictive algorithm in 2 groups: Low risk of PE (\<1/160) and High risk of PE (\>1/160).
To the patients classified as high risk at any of the steps, will be offered prophylactic treatment with AcetylSalicylic acid (ASA) (150mg/24h) until 36 weeks of pregnancy, if there is not a contraindication. All data from eligible patients will be analyzed. A bivariant statistical analysis will be performed in order to assess the relationship between dependent variables (diagnose of PE and/or IUGR) and the other variables included in this study
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pregnant women
All singleton pregnancies that present to the 12-week scan in the Obstetrics Unit of the participant hospitals. Singleton pregnancies; Gestational age less than 14 weeks, estimated according to Crown-Rump Length (CRL); Blood sample between 8 and 14 weeks of pregnancy; Patients who accept to participate in the study and sign the informed consent.
Pregnant women
All pregnant women that present to the 12-week scan in the Obstetrics Unit
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pregnant women
All pregnant women that present to the 12-week scan in the Obstetrics Unit
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Gestational age less than 14 weeks, estimated according to Crown-Rump Length (CRL);
* Blood sample between 8 and 14 weeks of pregnancy;
* Patients who accept to participate in the study and sign the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Multiple pregnancies;
* Non-acceptance of participation in the study.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
OTHER_GOV
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel Orós López
Fetal Medicine, Associate Professor, University of Zaragoza
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009 Jun;33(3):130-7. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.010.
Melchiorre K, Wormald B, Leslie K, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices in term and preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;32(2):133-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.5400.
Lisonkova S, Sabr Y, Mayer C, Young C, Skoll A, Joseph KS. Maternal morbidity associated with early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):771-781. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000472.
Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007 Nov 10;335(7627):974. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.385301.BE. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
von Beckerath AK, Kollmann M, Rotky-Fast C, Karpf E, Lang U, Klaritsch P. Perinatal complications and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;208(2):130.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.014. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
Melamed N, Klinger G, Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Herscovici T, Linder N, Hod M, Yogev Y. Short-term neonatal outcome in low-risk, spontaneous, singleton, late preterm deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):253-260. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181af6931.
Escobar GJ, Clark RH, Greene JD. Short-term outcomes of infants born at 35 and 36 weeks gestation: we need to ask more questions. Semin Perinatol. 2006 Feb;30(1):28-33. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.01.005.
Phipps EA, Thadhani R, Benzing T, Karumanchi SA. Pre-eclampsia: pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 May;15(5):275-289. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0119-6.
Flint EJ, Cerdeira AS, Redman CW, Vatish M. The role of angiogenic factors in the management of preeclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jun;98(6):700-707. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13540. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, O'Gorman N, Syngelaki A, de Paco Matallana C, Akolekar R, Cicero S, Janga D, Singh M, Molina FS, Persico N, Jani JC, Plasencia W, Papaioannou G, Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Meiri H, Gizurarson S, Maclagan K, Nicolaides KH. Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):613-622. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704559. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Roberge S, Bujold E, Nicolaides KH. Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):287-293.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.561. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
Wright D, Rolnik DL, Syngelaki A, de Paco Matallana C, Machuca M, de Alvarado M, Mastrodima S, Tan MY, Shearing S, Persico N, Jani JC, Plasencia W, Papaioannou G, Molina FS, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial: effect of aspirin on length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):612.e1-612.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
Roberge S, Villa P, Nicolaides K, Giguere Y, Vainio M, Bakthi A, Ebrashy A, Bujold E. Early administration of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;31(3):141-6. doi: 10.1159/000336662. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
Bujold E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y, Bureau M, Audibert F, Marcoux S, Forest JC, Giguere Y. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;116(2 Pt 1):402-414. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e9322a.
Rolnik DL, O'Gorman N, Roberge S, Bujold E, Hyett J, Uzan S, Beaufils M, da Silva Costa F. Early screening and prevention of preterm pre-eclampsia with aspirin: time for clinical implementation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):551-556. doi: 10.1002/uog.18899. No abstract available.
Shmueli A, Meiri H, Gonen R. Economic assessment of screening for pre-eclampsia. Prenat Diagn. 2012 Jan;32(1):29-38. doi: 10.1002/pd.2871. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 743 Summary: Low-Dose Aspirin Use During Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):254-256. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002709.
Tan MY, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Cicero S, Janga D, Singh M, Greco E, Wright A, Maclagan K, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of early screening for pre-eclampsia by NICE guidelines and a method combining maternal factors and biomarkers: results of SPREE. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;51(6):743-750. doi: 10.1002/uog.19039. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Sarquis R, Zvanca M, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of early, intermediate and late pre-eclampsia from maternal factors, biophysical and biochemical markers at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011 Jan;31(1):66-74. doi: 10.1002/pd.2660.
O'Gorman N, Wright D, Poon LC, Rolnik DL, Syngelaki A, Wright A, Akolekar R, Cicero S, Janga D, Jani J, Molina FS, de Paco Matallana C, Papantoniou N, Persico N, Plasencia W, Singh M, Nicolaides KH. Accuracy of competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):751-755. doi: 10.1002/uog.17399. Epub 2017 May 14.
Crovetto F, Figueras F, Crispi F, Triunfo S, Pugia M, Lasalvia L, Chambers AE, Mills WE, Banerjee S, Mercade I, Casals E, Mira A, Rodriguez-Revenga Bodi L, Gratacos E. Forms of Circulating Luteinizing Hormone Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Receptor for the Prediction of Early and Late Preeclampsia in the First Trimester of Pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38(2):94-102. doi: 10.1159/000371516. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
Scazzocchio E, Figueras F, Crispi F, Meler E, Masoller N, Mula R, Gratacos E. Performance of a first-trimester screening of preeclampsia in a routine care low-risk setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):203.e1-203.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.016. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
Wright A, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Georgantis A, Nicolaides KH. Two-stage screening for preterm preeclampsia at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;220(2):197.e1-197.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.092. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
Wright D, Gallo DM, Gil Pugliese S, Casanova C, Nicolaides KH. Contingent screening for preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;47(5):554-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.15807.
Robinson HP, Fleming JE. A critical evaluation of sonar "crown-rump length" measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975 Sep;82(9):702-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x.
Figueras F, Meler E, Iraola A, Eixarch E, Coll O, Figueras J, Francis A, Gratacos E, Gardosi J. Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jan;136(1):20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.12.015. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
Committee Opinion No. 638: First-Trimester Risk Assessment for Early-Onset Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):e25-e27. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001049.
Trilla C, Luna C, De Leon Socorro S, Rodriguez L, Ruiz-Romero A, Mora Brugues J, Benitez Delgado T, Fabre M, Martin Martinez A, Ruiz-Martinez S, Llurba E, Oros D. First-Trimester Sequential Screening for Preeclampsia Using Angiogenic Factors: Study Protocol for a Prospective, Multicenter, Real Clinical Setting Study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 26;9:931943. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.931943. eCollection 2022.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRISP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.