Effects of Neurodynamic Mobilization and Stretching Exercises for Chronic Discogenic Sciatica

NCT ID: NCT04746690

Last Updated: 2023-04-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-01

Study Completion Date

2021-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares between neurodynamic mobilization and stretching exercises in treatment of chronic dicogenic sciatica

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was conducted at the outpatient clinics, faculty of physical Therapy, Kafrelsheikh University to compare between the effects of slider, tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques and stretching exercises on pain, Range of motion (ROM) and functional disability for patients with chronic discogenic sciatica.

Design of the study:

A pre-test post-test three-armed comparative study design was used for comparison between the effects of slider, tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques and stretching exercises for patients with chronic discogenic sciatica.

Selection of patients:

Sample size:

Using G-power software program and regarding F test study , alpha level of 0.05, confidence interval 95% and effect size of 0.25 (to detect small effects ), three groups and 6 dependent variables, the total sample size will be 36 patient (twelve in each group).

To reach the specific sample size, forty-three patients were screened regarding the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Thirty-six patient with unilateral chronic discogenic sciatica from both sexes (….male and … female) were recruited from the outpatient clinics, faculty of physical Therapy, Kafrelsheikh University. Their age ranged between 21-50 years.

They were randomly allocated by simple random method; to avoid selection bias, patients were asked to choose a card of three wrapped cards representing the three treatment groups:

Group (A): received Slider technique only. Group (B): received Tensioner technique only. Group (C): received Stretching exercises of back extensors, hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles only.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physical Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

simple random sampling
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Slider neurodynamic mobilization technique only

a neurodynamic mobilization technique of the sciatic nerve with stretch on one nerve end and slackness on the other end.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Slider, tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques and stretching exercises of back, hamstrings and gastrocnemius

Intervention Type OTHER

neurodynamic mobilization techniques of sciatic nerve and stretching exercises of back extensors, hamstrings and lower limbs for patients with chronic discogenic sciatica.

Tensioner neurodynamic mobilization technique only

a neurodynamic mobilization technique of the sciatic nerve with stretch of both nerve ends.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Slider, tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques and stretching exercises of back, hamstrings and gastrocnemius

Intervention Type OTHER

neurodynamic mobilization techniques of sciatic nerve and stretching exercises of back extensors, hamstrings and lower limbs for patients with chronic discogenic sciatica.

Stretching exercises of back extensors, hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles

Stretching exercises of back extensors, hamstrings and gastrocnemius to relief the pressure on the nerve.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Slider, tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques and stretching exercises of back, hamstrings and gastrocnemius

Intervention Type OTHER

neurodynamic mobilization techniques of sciatic nerve and stretching exercises of back extensors, hamstrings and lower limbs for patients with chronic discogenic sciatica.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Slider, tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques and stretching exercises of back, hamstrings and gastrocnemius

neurodynamic mobilization techniques of sciatic nerve and stretching exercises of back extensors, hamstrings and lower limbs for patients with chronic discogenic sciatica.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

sliders, tensioners and stretching exercise

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirming disc lesion.
2. Radicular pain for at least twelve weeks up to one year with no acute episodes for the last four weeks.
3. Positive slump test, with reproduction of neurological symptoms.
4. Ages of 21-50 years of both sexes.
5. Patients with functional disabilities e.g. during lifting or walking

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with sciatica due to other pathologies e.g. lumbar canal stenosis or piriformis syndrome.
2. Patients after any spinal surgery e.g. unilateral hemilaminectomy or microdiscectomy
3. Negative slump test.
4. Progressive neurological symptoms e.g. hyperirritable and unstable symptoms.
5. History of vertebral fracture or trauma.
6. Systemic disorder e.g. diabetes mellitus.
7. Pregnant women.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kafrelsheikh University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mona Mohamed Ibrahim

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bassem El-nahass, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Haytham Ibrahim Morsi

Giza, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P.T.8/8/93

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.