A Dual Channel Supraglottic Airway Device (LMA Gastro) for Oxygenation in Patients Undergoing ERCP
NCT ID: NCT04740164
Last Updated: 2024-11-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-02-24
2023-05-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility of Laryngeal Mask Airway Gastro on Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Pancreas and Bile Duct Disorders
NCT03775681
Procedural Oxygen Mask vs. High-flow Nasal Cannula for Hypoxemia Prevention During ERCP
NCT06817603
Procedural Oxygen Mask vs. Nasal Cannula for Hypoxemia Prevention During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
NCT06681558
Randomized Trial of Wire and Sphincterotome Systems for Biliary Cannulation
NCT02197338
Factors Associated With Increased Risk of Bacteremia and Cholangitis in ERCP With Cholangioscopy
NCT02543957
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To compare the incidence of desaturation (oxygen saturation \[SpO2\] \< 90%) between patients undergoing ERCP with LMA Gastro versus (vs) standard nasal cannula.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the incidence of additional airway maneuvers (jaw thrust/chin lift/placement of oral airway or/nasal trumpet/intubation).
II. To evaluate the incidence of withdrawal of duodenoscope from the airway to facilitate airway support.
III. To evaluate the incidence of adverse events. IV. To evaluate times related to anesthesia and procedure (defined as "anesthesia start to anesthesia end" and "procedure start to procedure end" respectively).
V. To evaluate time from procedure end to anesthesia end. VI. To describe hemodynamics within the two groups (recorded blood pressures, heart rates, oxygen saturations, and end tidal carbon dioxide \[CO2\]).
VII. To evaluate anesthesiologist placing the device (training video viewed, number of practice attempts, years of experience).
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo ERCP with LMA Gastro.
ARM II: Patients undergo ERCP with standard nasal cannula.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (ERCP with LMA Gastro)
Patients undergo ERCP with LMA Gastro.
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Undergo ERCP with LMA Gastro
Arm II (ERCP with standard nasal cannula)
Patients undergo ERCP with standard nasal cannula.
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Undergo ERCP with standard nasal cannula
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Undergo ERCP with LMA Gastro
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Undergo ERCP with standard nasal cannula
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients at increased aspiration risk
* Patients with abnormal head/neck pathology preventing LMA Gastro placement
* Patients with surgical or radiation treatment to the head/neck making LMA Gastro placement difficult
* Patient with known difficult airway requiring advanced intubation equipment (with the exception of the video-laryngoscope) in the past
* Esophagectomy patients
* Patients already intubated upon arrival to endoscopy suite
* Patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)
* Patients with body mass index (BMI) \>= 35 kg/m\^2
* Patients with hypoxemia (SpO2 \< 94% on room air or on home oxygen)
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status IV-V
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Katherine Hagan
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2021-00118
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2020-1014
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2020-1014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.