Analysis and Accuracy of Mortality Prediction Scores

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

211 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-20

Study Completion Date

2020-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients admitted to the ICU in a tertiary burn centre in Kuwait were analysed using multiple mortality prediction scores. The accuracy of these scores were compared to each other to ascertain which prediction modality provides the most accurate prognosis.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

COVID-19 Patients Admitted to the ICU

NCT04816786

Covid19

UNKNOWN

Intensive Care Unit Risk Score

NCT04661735

Mortality in Intensive Care Units Complications Infection Alarm Fatigue

RECRUITING

Burden, Mortality and Supply Costs in Intensive Care Unit Patients

NCT04094428

Burden, Dependency Mortality End-of-life Care +4 more

RECRUITING

Indirect Calorimetry Versus Urea-creatinine Ratio to Evaluate Catabolism in Critically Ill Patients

NCT06244381

Critically Ill

COMPLETED

Scoring System for Inhalation Injury

NCT01194024

Inhalation Injury

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of three established scoring systems used for burn patients admitted to the intensive care unit and to determine the risk factors associated with poor outcomes.

A total of 211 patients with who were admitted to the ICBU in a tertiary care centre in Kuwait from January 2017 to December 2019 were analysed retrospectively. Data were collected using patient medical records. The FLAMES, BOBI and revised Baux scores were calculated, and the survivor and non-survivor scores of patients were analysed to determine the sensitivity, specificity and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) of the different scoring modalities.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Burns Morality

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mortality scores

Revised Baux, BOBI and FLAMES scores

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Pediatric burn patients with partial/full thickness burns\>10% TBSA Adult patients with partial/full thickness burns \>15% TBSA Patients with electric burns Patients iwth burns involving the voice Any patient with suspected inhalational injury Burn patients with significant comorbidities