Patient and Healthcare Professional Views on Genetic/Genomic Information and Testing

NCT ID: NCT04733274

Last Updated: 2025-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

227 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-22

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Technologic advances (i.e. next generation sequencing technologies and novel bioinformatics approaches) have been drivers of scientific discovery and have deepened our understanding of the genetics and genomics of health and disease. In parallel, the falling cost of sequencing has led to screening moving from specialty clinics into the primary care setting. However, our ability to help patients and families understand these technologies and related genetic health literacy issues lag behind. These factors pose a number of questions and challenges for clinicians including: how can we best present complex genetic/genomic information to patients to ensure that patients understand the information and can make informed decisions? What are the specific information and support needs of patients and families to be able to make decisions that are in line with their values? In collaboration with investigators from the Harvard Reproductive Endocrine Sciences Center at the Massachusetts General Hospital, this project broadly aims to examine patient understanding and factors affecting decisions surrounding genetic testing. Using the paradigm of a rare genetic disorder (isolated gonadotropin releasing hormone \[GnRH\] deficiency - hypogonadotropic hypogonadism/Kallmann syndrome \[HH/KS\]) we will examine the views and perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals alike regarding genetic/genomic information and testing with the intention of identifying patient-centered responses to these unmet needs and challenges.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The focus of this study is to better understand perspectives on genetic testing. The study will collect and analyze both quantitative and qualitative data form healthcare professionals as well as patients. Findings will be used to inform more person-centered approaches to genetic testing that will support high-quality decisions that are informed and aligned with patient values and preferences. To achieve this, the study has three specific aims.

Aim 1. Evaluate the understandability and acceptability of education materials (including information on genetic testing) co-created with patients.

Patient education materials will be created drawing on healthcare professionals expertise (i.e. content experts) and patients (i.e. lived experience). Quality of materials will be quantitatively measured using the gold standard Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT).

Aim 2. Identify the central elements for a patient decision aid using expert clinician opinion.

Healthcare professionals who are content experts in the field will be surveyed to determine key information for a proposed genetic testing decision aid. Quantitative findings will guide the content of a patient decision aid for genetic testing.

Aim 3. Explore patient needs for information and support related to genetic testing.

Qualitative focus groups with patients will be conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings will inform the development of a patient decision aid for genetic testing that is responsive to the aspects which matter most to patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypogonadism, Hypogonadotropic Kallmann Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. self-identified as having been diagnosed with either normosmic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) or Kallmann syndrome (KS)
2. between the ages of 18-70 years
3. primary language is English/capable of responding to a written questionnaire in English
4. has lived in the United states for 5 years or longer
5. checking the opt-in electronic consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. other diagnosis of hypogonadism i.e. Klinefelter syndrome, or adult-onset hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
2. outside the stated age range
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Boston College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrew Dwyer

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew A Dwyer, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Boston College

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Boston College

Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dwyer AA, Uveges M, Dockray S, Smith N. Advancing qualitative rare disease research methodology: a comparison of virtual and in-person focus group formats. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Sep 11;17(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02522-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36089593 (View on PubMed)

Dwyer AA, Zeng Z, Lee CS. Validating online approaches for rare disease research using latent class mixture modeling. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 May 10;16(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01827-z.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33971926 (View on PubMed)

Dwyer AA, Uveges MK, Dockray S, Smith N. Exploring Rare Disease Patient Attitudes and Beliefs regarding Genetic Testing: Implications for Person-Centered Care. J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):477. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030477.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35330476 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18.081.01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Inherited Reproductive Disorders
NCT01500447 RECRUITING
Incidental Genomics
NCT03597165 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
The Informed Genetics Annotated Patient Registry
NCT04419896 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION