Patient and Healthcare Professional Views on Genetic/Genomic Information and Testing
NCT ID: NCT04733274
Last Updated: 2025-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
227 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-03-22
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Surveying Parents About Genome Screening of Newborns
NCT01736501
Investigation of the Genetic Causes of Kallmann Syndrome and Reproductive Disorders
NCT00494169
Pediatric Reporting of Adult-Onset Genomic Results
NCT03832985
Educational Video for Genetic Testing
NCT05472714
Adult Patients With Undiagnosed Conditions and Their Responses to Clinically Uncertain Results From Exome Sequencing
NCT03605004
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1. Evaluate the understandability and acceptability of education materials (including information on genetic testing) co-created with patients.
Patient education materials will be created drawing on healthcare professionals expertise (i.e. content experts) and patients (i.e. lived experience). Quality of materials will be quantitatively measured using the gold standard Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT).
Aim 2. Identify the central elements for a patient decision aid using expert clinician opinion.
Healthcare professionals who are content experts in the field will be surveyed to determine key information for a proposed genetic testing decision aid. Quantitative findings will guide the content of a patient decision aid for genetic testing.
Aim 3. Explore patient needs for information and support related to genetic testing.
Qualitative focus groups with patients will be conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings will inform the development of a patient decision aid for genetic testing that is responsive to the aspects which matter most to patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. between the ages of 18-70 years
3. primary language is English/capable of responding to a written questionnaire in English
4. has lived in the United states for 5 years or longer
5. checking the opt-in electronic consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. outside the stated age range
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Boston College
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Andrew Dwyer
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrew A Dwyer, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston College
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Boston College
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dwyer AA, Uveges M, Dockray S, Smith N. Advancing qualitative rare disease research methodology: a comparison of virtual and in-person focus group formats. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Sep 11;17(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02522-3.
Dwyer AA, Zeng Z, Lee CS. Validating online approaches for rare disease research using latent class mixture modeling. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 May 10;16(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01827-z.
Dwyer AA, Uveges MK, Dockray S, Smith N. Exploring Rare Disease Patient Attitudes and Beliefs regarding Genetic Testing: Implications for Person-Centered Care. J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):477. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030477.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18.081.01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.