Evaluate and Understand Preferences and Representations in Families of Patients With Regard to High-throughput Sequencing Technology for Diagnostic Purposes

NCT ID: NCT02814747

Last Updated: 2026-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

530 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

After the use of DNA chips for diagnostic purposes, high-throughput sequencing (HTS) is transforming the field of developmental diseases, from fundamental research to care. Nonetheless, before HTS can be transferred to everyday clinical practice, in particular for expert diagnosis using exome HTS, it is necessary to anticipate the nature of the information to be given to patients and to parents in order to obtain consent for exome HTS.

The objective in terms of public health is to allow patients with rare diseases to benefit from innovative technologies in optimal conditions of information and accompaniment.

the objectives of this project are to

1. evaluate the preferences of families of patients with development disorders as regard to suspicious and incidental findings from HTS before its introduction for diagnostic purpose,
2. and then, following the exome analyses carried out for diagnostic purposes, describe, analyse and understand the experience, expectations and reactions of families and geneticists concerning the diagnostic trajectory in general and at the time the results of the HTS were announced in particular A methodology that associated quantitative and qualitative approaches was chosen so as to combine the advantages and overcome the shortcomings of each: a quantitative study to investigate a large number of patients, which would ensure a certain representativeness of the population and allow sub-groups analyses to study the upstream phase concerning indications for high-throughput sequencing; and a qualitative study, which though it allows only a small number of patients to be investigated, makes it possible to describe, analyze and understand in depth the complex downstream phenomena of high-throughput sequencing results

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rare Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

quantitive study: 500 patients likely to be candidates for HTS

quantitive study: 500 patients likely to be candidates for HTS at CR in Dijon and Lyon, that is to say patients with development anomalies and/or intellectual deficiency with no etiological diagnosis.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

quantitive study: 500 patients likely to be candidates for HTS

Intervention Type OTHER

qualitative study: 30 patients who have benefited from HTS and

qualitative study: 30 patients who have benefited from HTS and the medical geneticists who accompanied them in this approach.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

qualitative study: 30 patients who have benefited from HTS

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

quantitive study: 500 patients likely to be candidates for HTS

Intervention Type OTHER

qualitative study: 30 patients who have benefited from HTS

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* parents of patients with development anomaly and/or intellectual deficiency with no etiological diagnosis
* parents of patients consulting at the centres of reference in Dijon or Lyon
* parents of patients who have not already benefited from HTS
* parents of patients who are fluent in French

* persons without national health insurance cover
* inability to answer the questionnaires

Qualitative study


* persons who have provided written informed consent
* parents of patients with a development anomaly
* parents of patients consulting at the centres of reference in Dijon or Lyon
* parents of patients who have already benefited from HTS for diagnostic purposes
* persons fluent in French

* persons without national health insurance cover
* cognitive impairment making it impossible for the person to understand the aims of the study
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Dijon Bourgogne

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chassagne A, Pelissier A, Houdayer F, Cretin E, Gautier E, Salvi D, Kidri S, Godard A, Thauvin-Robinet C, Masurel A, Lehalle D, Jean-Marcais N, Thevenon J, Lesca G, Putoux A, Cordier MP, Dupuis-Girod S, Till M, Duffourd Y, Riviere JB, Joly L, Juif C, Putois O, Ancet P, Lapointe AS, Morin P, Edery P, Rossi M, Sanlaville D, Bejean S, Peyron C, Faivre L. Exome sequencing in clinical settings: preferences and experiences of parents of children with rare diseases (SEQUAPRE study). Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 May;27(5):701-710. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0332-y. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30710147 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OLIVIER-FAIVRE 2014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.