Study Comparing Fibula Free-flap MR With or Without PVP in Patients With OOPC

NCT ID: NCT04725396

Last Updated: 2025-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

132 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-20

Study Completion Date

2025-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a national multicenter, randomized, stratified, open label study, aiming to compare mandibular reconstruction (MR) with or without preoperative virtual planning (PVP), in patients with oral/oropharyngeal cancer (OOPC).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PVP-assisted MR includes the production of the surgical cutting guides required for mandibular resection and fibula free-flap conformation and of the preformed plates for flap osteosynthesis (for all patients, PVP will be done by the same laboratory: Materialise laboratory).

PVP-assisted MR includes the production of :

* surgical cutting guides required for mandibular resection and fibula free-flap conformation
* preformed plates for flap osteosynthesis

Patients will be selected after the multidisciplinary decision of oncological surgery including segmental mandibulectomy and immediate MR. Patients will be randomized in 2 groups (ratio 1:1, stratified on center and tumor N status \[0-1 vs 2-3\]).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Oropharynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients undergoing PVP-assisted MR

PVP is based on CT-scan with millimetric thin slice acquisitions of the facial bone and fibulas. The surgeon defines the exact sites of the intended mandibular osteotomies. A single external subcontracted laboratory (Materialise®) produces the various cutting guides for mandibular resection, flap conformation and the preformed plates for flap osteosynthesis. Flap conformation is entirely performed at the donor site before section of the vascular pedicle (flap still vascularized).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mandibular Reconstruction (MR) with Preoperative Virtual Planning (PVP).

Intervention Type DEVICE

PVP-assisted mandibular reconstruction includes the production of the surgical cutting guides required for mandibular resection and fibula free-flap conformation and of the preformed plates for flap osteosynthesis (for all patients, PVP will be done by the same laboratory).

Patients undergoing conventional (i.e. without PVP) MR

Flap modeling and positioning requires one or multiple cuneiform osteotomies. The bone transplant is shaped to restore the contours of the mandibular defect using preoperative imaging studies and the resection specimen. Flap conformation begins at the donor site and is generally completed at the recipient site after fibular pedicle section and before microvascular anastomosis (during ischemia time). The different bone fragments are fixed together and to the native mandible using either titanium miniplates or reconstruction plate and monocortical screws. Regardless of the material used for fixing the fibular flap to the native mandible, the use of a reconstruction plate adapted to the native mandible (or other similar techniques) prior to tumor resection is recommended to guide flap shaping and positioning, and to insure an accurate MR.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Mandibular Reconstruction (MR without PVP)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Mandibular Reconstruction

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mandibular Reconstruction (MR) with Preoperative Virtual Planning (PVP).

PVP-assisted mandibular reconstruction includes the production of the surgical cutting guides required for mandibular resection and fibula free-flap conformation and of the preformed plates for flap osteosynthesis (for all patients, PVP will be done by the same laboratory).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Mandibular Reconstruction (MR without PVP)

Conventional Mandibular Reconstruction

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Aged 18 years or over
2. Primary or recurrent OOPC, histologically proven, requiring segmental mandibulectomy
3. Planned immediate fibula free flap MR to be performed at the same time as the tumor ablation by segmental mandibulectomy
4. MR requiring at least one osteotomy for contouring the flap (i.e. at least 2 bone fragments)
5. East Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
6. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) score 1, 2, or 3
7. Patients considered fit for surgery as decided by the multidisciplinary team
8. Patients must be willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study including scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures
9. Patients must be affiliated to a Social Security System (or equivalent)
10. Patients must have signed a written informed consent form prior to any trial specific procedures. If the patients are physically unable to give their written consent, a trusted person of their choice, not related to the investigator or the sponsor, can confirm in writing the patient's consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Non resectable tumors (T4b primary tumor, non resectable metastatic lymph nodes)
2. Comorbidities factors that would contraindicate surgery (such as severe peripheral artery disease)
3. MR requiring no osteotomy for contouring the flap (i.e. one bone fragment)
4. Patients with distant metastatic disease as determined by routine pre-operative staging radiological investigations e.g. CT thorax and upper abdomen or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT
5. Other uncontrolled malignancy
6. Serious, non-healing or dehiscing wound, active ulcer or ongoing bone fracture at the free-flap donor site
7. Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the medical follow-up required by the trial because of psychosocial, familial, social, or geographical reasons
8. Participation in another clinical study with an investigational medicinal product during the last 30 days prior to inclusion
9. Patients deprived of their liberty or under protective custody or guardianship
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UNICANCER

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexandre BOZEC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Centre François Baclesse

Caen, , France

Site Status

Centre Oscar Lambret

Lille, , France

Site Status

CHU Gui de Chauliac

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CHU Hotel Dieu

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Centre Antoine Lacassagne

Nice, , France

Site Status

CHU Pontchaillou

Rennes, , France

Site Status

IUCT-O

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CHR de Valenciennes

Valenciennes, , France

Site Status

Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-A02655-34

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

UC-HNG-2009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Buccal Cancer Resection Ultrasound Guided
NCT05852665 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA