BiZact Tonsillectomy in the Pediatric Population

NCT ID: NCT04725305

Last Updated: 2024-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

144 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-06

Study Completion Date

2024-07-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study has been designed to evaluate how effective the Bizact tonsillectomy device is in reducing operating time and complications that occur after surgery. This device operates in a different way than the standard device that is used for most tonsillectomies. In 2019, a study was conducted in 186 children and adults using this device in tonsillectomies. Results showed lower blood loss and shortened time in surgery. However, the rate for bleeding as a complication after surgery was the same as other procedures that are used in tonsillectomy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Tonsillectomy is the second most common pediatric surgical procedure, with more than 280,000 performed in children under the age of 15 in the United States in 2010. The most common indications for tonsillectomy in children include recurrent infections and obstructive sleep apnea. While tonsillectomy in the pediatric population is generally safe and well-tolerated, post-operative complications are not uncommon, with post-operative pain, respiratory compromise, and post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage being chief among them.

Post-operative pain has been described as the main morbidity associated with tonsillectomy and is often ineffectively controlled. Pain beyond the initial 24-hour post-operative period has been noted to be worse with the use of electrocautery when compared to cold-knife dissection and snare tonsillectomy, perhaps attributable to the high levels of heat (400 °C to 600 °C) applied directly to the tonsillar area. Yet electrocautery remains one of the most frequently utilized tools due to its hemostatic effects through vessel coagulation at the time of dissection. Still, a recent large meta-analysis reported the rates of primary post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage (bleeding within the first 24 hours) at 2.4% and secondary post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage (beyond 24 hours) at 2.6%, suggesting that bleeding after tonsillectomy remains a relatively common occurrence. The search for a methodology that improves post-operative pain without increasing the risk of post-operative hemorrhage remains an active area of research.

Coblation, which creates an ionized plasma layer by passing a bipolar radio-frequency current through a medium of saline, offers another approach. The saline irrigation results in much less heat when compared to monopolar cautery, measuring approximately 40°C to 70°C. Coblation can be used in both subcapsular and intracapsular fashion. Subcapsular tonsillectomy with coblation has demonstrated a minimal decrease in pain, and may result in slightly higher rates of post-operative hemorrhage.

It has been pointed out that bipolar cautery could result in lower thermal injury and reduced blood loss, however tonsillectomy using traditional bipolar forceps leads to longer operative times. One group found that the use of BiClamp, a bipolar vascular sealing device originally designed for thyroidectomy, provided decreased operative times and less intraoperative bleeding compared to electrocautery. They noted, however, instances of posterior pillar perforation, which they attributed to curvature of the device that was designed for thyroid surgery, making dissection of the superior pole more difficult. Medtronic has now developed a similar device designed for use in tonsillectomy with a curved jaw meant to follow the contour of the tonsillar bed. In its marketing material for the recently developed BiZact , Medtronic describes a bipolar device that continuously measures the impedance of clamped tissue, adjusting energy levels in real-time and automatically stopping energy delivery when a seal is established. Their literature suggests the device permanently seals vessels up to 3mm with less thermal damage, resulting in less intraoperative blood loss, more efficient procedures, and possibly less pain.

In a pilot study of 186 patients, intraoperative blood loss was shown to be \<1ml of blood loss in 71 cases (38.2%) and between 1 and 10ml of blood loss in 81 cases (43.5%). Post-operative hemorrhage rate of 4.3% is similar to rates described by other studies. BiZact tonsillectomy allows for a shortened operative time with a median time of 5.1 minutes. Other studies have shown other techniques to have a time duration of 21.6 minutes (electrocautery), 20.20 minutes (coblator), and 16.14 minutes (microdebrider).

In off label use of the device at our institution, data from surgeons using the device showed that surgeons perceived a relative improvement in following compared to standard tonsillectomy:

1. Less perceived thermal heat transfer to surrounding soft tissues
2. Left perceived blood loss
3. Superior ease of obtaining timely hemostasis
4. Faster operative time

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tonsillectomy Tonsillitis Chronic Hemorrhage Postoperative Pain Postoperative Hemorrhage Surgery--Complications Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two groups of participants will receive different interventions. One arm will receive the standard of care ( electrocautery) and the other group will receive the BIZACT method of tonsillectomy. The group allocation will be carried out by stratified randomization.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The participant will not be aware of the arm that the participate will be placed in- i.e. whether the tonsillectomy was carried out by electrocautery or using the BiZact device

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BiZact

A bipolar electrosurgical device that employs radiofrequency(RF) energy and pressure to ligate vessels interposed between its jaws which can then be transected using the built in knife deployed by the device trigger

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BiZact

Intervention Type DEVICE

It has been described as describes a bipolar device that continuously measures impedance of clamped tissue, adjusting energy levels in real time and automatically stopping energy delivery when a seal is established. Their literature suggests the device permanently seals vessels up to 3mm with less thermal damage, resulting in less intraoperative blood loss, more efficient procedures, and possibly less pain

Standard of care

In electrocautery tonsillectomy (or diathermy) electric current from a radiofrequency generator is passed through the tissue between two electrodes. The resulting high temperature (400º-600ºC) cuts the tissue and simultaneously seals the blood vessels

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard of care

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This method would involve removal of tonsils using electrocautery technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BiZact

It has been described as describes a bipolar device that continuously measures impedance of clamped tissue, adjusting energy levels in real time and automatically stopping energy delivery when a seal is established. Their literature suggests the device permanently seals vessels up to 3mm with less thermal damage, resulting in less intraoperative blood loss, more efficient procedures, and possibly less pain

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard of care

This method would involve removal of tonsils using electrocautery technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Tonsil hypertrophy with sleep disordered breathing
* Recurrent tonsillitis or pharyngitis
* Tonsil asymmetry or neoplasm
* Tonsil stones
* Must be able to take ibuprofen

Exclusion Criteria

* Bleeding disorders such as von Willebrand's disease or hemophilia
* Down's Syndrome or other craniofacial syndromes
* Revision tonsillectomy cases
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Baylor College of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ronald Vilela

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Texas Children's Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hall MJ, Schwartzman A, Zhang J, Liu X. Ambulatory Surgery Data From Hospitals and Ambulatory Surgery Centers: United States, 2010. Natl Health Stat Report. 2017 Feb;(102):1-15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28256998 (View on PubMed)

Rosenfeld RM, Green RP. Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy: changing trends. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990 Mar;99(3 Pt 1):187-91.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2178542 (View on PubMed)

De Luca Canto G, Pacheco-Pereira C, Aydinoz S, Bhattacharjee R, Tan HL, Kheirandish-Gozal L, Flores-Mir C, Gozal D. Adenotonsillectomy Complications: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015 Oct;136(4):702-18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1283. Epub 2015 Sep 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26391937 (View on PubMed)

Baugh RF, Archer SM, Mitchell RB, Rosenfeld RM, Amin R, Burns JJ, Darrow DH, Giordano T, Litman RS, Li KK, Mannix ME, Schwartz RH, Setzen G, Wald ER, Wall E, Sandberg G, Patel MM; American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Clinical practice guideline: tonsillectomy in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jan;144(1 Suppl):S1-30. doi: 10.1177/0194599810389949.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21493257 (View on PubMed)

Nunez DA, Provan J, Crawford M. Postoperative tonsillectomy pain in pediatric patients: electrocautery (hot) vs cold dissection and snare tonsillectomy--a randomized trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Jul;126(7):837-41. doi: 10.1001/archotol.126.7.837.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10888995 (View on PubMed)

Jones DT, Kenna MA, Guidi J, Huang L, Johnston PR, Licameli GR. Comparison of postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing coblation tonsillectomy versus cautery tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;144(6):972-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599811400369. Epub 2011 Apr 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21493315 (View on PubMed)

Heidemann CH, Wallen M, Aakesson M, Skov P, Kjeldsen AD, Godballe C. Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage: assessment of risk factors with special attention to introduction of coblation technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jul;266(7):1011-5. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0834-2. Epub 2008 Oct 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18953553 (View on PubMed)

Lee SW, Jeon SS, Lee JD, Lee JY, Kim SC, Koh YW. A comparison of postoperative pain and complications in tonsillectomy using BiClamp forceps and electrocautery tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Aug;139(2):228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.04.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18656720 (View on PubMed)

Pizzuto MP, Brodsky L, Duffy L, Gendler J, Nauenberg E. A comparison of microbipolar cautery dissection to hot knife and cold knife cautery tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2000 May 30;52(3):239-46. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(00)00293-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10841953 (View on PubMed)

Medtronic Brief: More efficient tonsillectomies. Boulder Colorado, 2017. Retrieved from http://www.medtronic.com/content/dam/covidien/library/us/en/product/vessel-sealing/bizact-tonsillectomy-device-product-information-kit.pdf, 9/23/18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Krishnan G, Stepan L, Du C, Padhye V, Bassiouni A, Dharmawardana N, Ooi EH, Krishnan S. Tonsillectomy using the BiZact: A pilot study in 186 children and adults. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 May;44(3):392-396. doi: 10.1111/coa.13273. Epub 2019 Feb 4. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30576062 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-44399

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Celecoxib After Tonsillectomy
NCT02934191 COMPLETED PHASE2