PEAK PlasmaBlade TnA Versus Traditional Electrosurgery in Subcapsular Tonsillectomy
NCT ID: NCT01193556
Last Updated: 2013-01-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
51 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-07-31
2012-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Peak(R) vs. Electrocautery in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy With Adenoidectomy
NCT02533999
Randomized Controlled Study of Plasmaknife Tonsillectomy Versus Monopolar Tonsillectomy
NCT00466544
Comparison of Floseal Hemostasis Tonsillectomy With Coblation Tonsillectomy and Cautery Hemostasis Tonsillectomy
NCT00459927
A Study of BiZact™ on Children and Adolescents Undergoing Tonsillectomy
NCT03266094
A Study of BiZact™ on Adults Undergoing Tonsillectomy
NCT02876575
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The PEAK PlasmaBlade uses pulsed radiofrequency (RF) energy and a highly-insulated handpiece design to enable precision cutting and coagulation at the point of application. The PlasmaBlade has received FDA clearance for use in plastic, general, orthopedic, and ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgery, and has demonstrated a significantly reduced thermal injury profile in incised tissue compared to traditional electrosurgical devices. It is hypothesized that this benefit may improve the post-operative outcome of patients undergoing tonsillectomy.
Two study sites were granted approval for this prospective randomized study. Potential subjects were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol and were required to provide informed consent for themselves (adults) or for their child prior to enrollment. Following enrollment, subjects were prospectively randomized to the SOC or PlasmaBlade (PB or PEAK) study groups and scheduled for tonsillectomy or tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (TnA).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of Care
Traditional electrosurgery will be used for the tonsillectomy.
Traditional Electrosurgery with scalpel
Traditional electrosurgery for the tonsillectomy.
PlasmaBlade
The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the tonsillectomy.
PEAK PlasmaBlade TnA
The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the tonsillectomy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PEAK PlasmaBlade TnA
The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the tonsillectomy.
Traditional Electrosurgery with scalpel
Traditional electrosurgery for the tonsillectomy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Physically healthy, stable weight
3. Requiring tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy per widely accepted indications
4. For adults, subject must understand the nature of the procedure and provide written informed consent.
5. For children and adolescents age 7 to 17, subject must understand the nature of the procedure and be able to give verbal assent prior to the procedure. In addition, parent or guardian must provide written informed consent.
6. For children under 7 years old, parent or guardian must understand the nature of the procedure and provide written informed consent.
7. Subject (or responsible parent or guardian) must be willing and able to comply with all follow-up evaluations, including completion of study data sheets.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Bleeding disorder
3. Peritonsillar abscess
4. Requiring concomitant uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP)
5. Anticoagulation therapy which cannot be discontinued
6. Unable to follow instructions or complete follow-up
7. Currently taking any medication known to affect healing
8. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial
3 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Surgical Technologies
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brian Weeks, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Senta Clinic
Mark Spitzer, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mark Spitzer, DO
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Surgery Center Merced
Merced, California, United States
Alvarado Hospital
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PEAK VP-00075
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.