Topical Microporous Polysaccharide Hemospheres Versus Electrocautery for Control of Pediatric Post-Tonsillectomy Bleeding
NCT ID: NCT00945412
Last Updated: 2017-01-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE3
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-07-31
2011-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Floseal Hemostasis Tonsillectomy With Coblation Tonsillectomy and Cautery Hemostasis Tonsillectomy
NCT00459927
Hemostasis Using Surgicel in Pediatric Tonsillectomy
NCT03984851
Randomized Controlled Study of Plasmaknife Tonsillectomy Versus Monopolar Tonsillectomy
NCT00466544
Coblation-Tonsillotomy vs Electrocautery-Tonsillectomy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in Children
NCT00694772
Effect of Tonsillar Pillar Closure on Postoperative Pain and Bleeding Risk After Tonsillectomy
NCT00394849
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Micropolysaccharide Hemospheres (MPH)
Micropolysaccharide Hemospheres (Arista)
MPH is applied as an aerosolized powder which is applied to the bleeding fossa, immediately after suctioning the freshly completed tonsillotomy site to expose the tonsil bed. A separate aerosolizer is used for each patient in order to maximize uniformity per standard dose applied. Each initial dose remains in situ for up to 60 seconds in an attempt to achieve complete hemostasis with a single dose. (Prior data from MPH use has shown that 30-60 seconds is the time typically required for hemostasis for diffuse, non-arterial bleeds.) If there is persistent bleeding after this timeframe, then the bed is irrigated and suctioned and a second equivalent dose is applied.
No pressure pack and no oxymetazoline or other topical vasoconstrictor is applied in either group during these initial hemostatic steps, since they are potential confounders of hemostatic effect.
Electrocautery
Electrocautery (Monopolar suction cautery)
Monopolar suction electrocautery is used at 20 Watts. Cautery is applied with a light surface touch until bleeding has stopped. In addition, any prominent visible vessels are cauterized.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Micropolysaccharide Hemospheres (Arista)
MPH is applied as an aerosolized powder which is applied to the bleeding fossa, immediately after suctioning the freshly completed tonsillotomy site to expose the tonsil bed. A separate aerosolizer is used for each patient in order to maximize uniformity per standard dose applied. Each initial dose remains in situ for up to 60 seconds in an attempt to achieve complete hemostasis with a single dose. (Prior data from MPH use has shown that 30-60 seconds is the time typically required for hemostasis for diffuse, non-arterial bleeds.) If there is persistent bleeding after this timeframe, then the bed is irrigated and suctioned and a second equivalent dose is applied.
No pressure pack and no oxymetazoline or other topical vasoconstrictor is applied in either group during these initial hemostatic steps, since they are potential confounders of hemostatic effect.
Electrocautery (Monopolar suction cautery)
Monopolar suction electrocautery is used at 20 Watts. Cautery is applied with a light surface touch until bleeding has stopped. In addition, any prominent visible vessels are cauterized.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Children and adolescents age 5-18 years old. The lower age range is chosen in order to spare younger, smaller children who have less circulating volume to decrease any potential unwarranted risks of increased bleeding. The upper age range is chosen because our ultimate focus is to determine whether this therapy can help the pediatric population prevent the need for electrocautery under anesthesia for tonsil-related bleeding.
2. Obstructive sleep disorder symptomatology requiring surgical intervention. The presence of obstructive sleep disorder is determined according to the practice of the otolaryngologist investigator, and includes at least two of the following: medical history, physical exam findings, nasopharyngoscopy, lateral x-ray, sleep videotape, or polysomnography. In addition, the mean survey score on the OSD-6 (which is an instrument validated in children with obstructive sleep disorder (See Figure 2)) is at least 3, which corresponds to a moderate degree of symptoms (0 no symptoms, 6 symptoms could not be worse).
3. Tonsillar or adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Tonsillar hypertrophy is defined as at least 3+ tonsillar hypertrophy on a scale of 1+ to 4+, with the following definition of grades of obstruction determined by visual inspection: 1+ 0-25%, 2+ 26-50%, 3+ 51-75%, 4+ 76-100%.
4. Bilateral microdebrider tonsillotomy. This method of surgery is chosen because it (1) is a standard technique utilized by the surgeons involved in this study as treatment of obstructive tonsillar hypertrophy and (2) results in a relatively uniform, reproducible bleeding surface that requires hemostasis following tonsil removal.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Personal or family history of bleeding diathesis or easy bruising. The introduction of this confounder should be avoided, given that the primary outcome is adequacy of hemostasis. Given that preoperative laboratory evaluation in the setting of no suggestive history has been shown to have low predictive values for successful perioperative hemostasis, enrolled subjects receive no preoperative laboratory screening.
2. Intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 14 days prior to surgery. Although there are several trials that suggest that postoperative administration of these drugs may have no impact on hemorrhage, the topic remains controversial due to the large numbers of subjects required to achieve adequate power in such studies. Thus, the introduction of this potential confounder is avoided, given that the primary outcome is adequacy of hemostasis.
3. Liver dysfunction. This disease state may also confound evaluation of hemostasis.
4. Cardiac, renal, or blood pressure disorder. These states may make children less tolerant of hemorrhage, and so they are excluded in order to minimize risk.
5. Chronic inflammation states, such as recurrent pharyngitis, may result in an increased propensity toward bleeding, and thus subjects with this potential confounder are excluded. Children with 3 or more acute pharyngitis episodes within the past year are excluded. A pharyngitis episode is defined as documentation by physician of the episode and \>1 of the following: oral \>38.3 degrees C, lymphadenopathy \>2cm or tender lymphadenopathy, tonsil/pharyngeal exudates, group A beta hemolytic streptococcus positive, or antibiotic administration for proved/suspected streptococcal infection.
6. Implant contraindications to the use of monopolar electrocautery. Metal implants would preclude safe randomization to the electrocautery treatment arm. There are no suspected or known contraindications to application of MPH at the tonsillar fossae.
7. Allergic or adverse reactions to requisite perioperative medications. The current protocol calls for the use of an antibiotic and narcotic pain medication in all subjects, with one second-line agent as a planned alternative. Thus, inability to tolerate both penicillin and macrolide antibiotics, or both oxycodone and codeine narcotics, precludes entry into the trial.
8. Children whose caregivers cannot commit to the 2 week follow up schedule. This schedule includes daily calls to evaluate bleeding and pain control.
9. Cognitive inability to report bleeding, adverse events, or pain control. Thus, children with mental retardation, communication disorders, developmental delay, and chronic pain states are also excluded.
5 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael J Cunningham, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09-04-031
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.