Topical Microporous Polysaccharide Hemospheres Versus Electrocautery for Control of Pediatric Post-Tonsillectomy Bleeding

NCT ID: NCT00945412

Last Updated: 2017-01-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The ultimate goal of this work is to establish a method for control bleeding after tonsillectomy in awake children. Treatment of post-tonsillectomy bleeding in children typically requires general anesthesia with currently used electrocautery techniques. Micropolysaccharide hemosphere technology is a unique absorbable agent that helps clot form. These hemospheres consist of 100% purified plant starch that enhances natural clotting by concentrating blood solids such as platelets, red blood cells, and blood proteins on the particle surfaces to form a gelled matrix. This device provides painless, non-irritating control of bleeding, and has been used effectively for control of nosebleeds in awake adult patients. This device, however, has not been tested in the tonsillar fossae in children; thus, this study is performed to determine if at least 50% of children with bleeding tonsillar fossae can be spared rescue treatment with electrocautery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obstructive Sleep Disorder Obstructive Sleep Apnea Tonsillar Hypertrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Micropolysaccharide Hemospheres (MPH)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Micropolysaccharide Hemospheres (Arista)

Intervention Type DEVICE

MPH is applied as an aerosolized powder which is applied to the bleeding fossa, immediately after suctioning the freshly completed tonsillotomy site to expose the tonsil bed. A separate aerosolizer is used for each patient in order to maximize uniformity per standard dose applied. Each initial dose remains in situ for up to 60 seconds in an attempt to achieve complete hemostasis with a single dose. (Prior data from MPH use has shown that 30-60 seconds is the time typically required for hemostasis for diffuse, non-arterial bleeds.) If there is persistent bleeding after this timeframe, then the bed is irrigated and suctioned and a second equivalent dose is applied.

No pressure pack and no oxymetazoline or other topical vasoconstrictor is applied in either group during these initial hemostatic steps, since they are potential confounders of hemostatic effect.

Electrocautery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Electrocautery (Monopolar suction cautery)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Monopolar suction electrocautery is used at 20 Watts. Cautery is applied with a light surface touch until bleeding has stopped. In addition, any prominent visible vessels are cauterized.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Micropolysaccharide Hemospheres (Arista)

MPH is applied as an aerosolized powder which is applied to the bleeding fossa, immediately after suctioning the freshly completed tonsillotomy site to expose the tonsil bed. A separate aerosolizer is used for each patient in order to maximize uniformity per standard dose applied. Each initial dose remains in situ for up to 60 seconds in an attempt to achieve complete hemostasis with a single dose. (Prior data from MPH use has shown that 30-60 seconds is the time typically required for hemostasis for diffuse, non-arterial bleeds.) If there is persistent bleeding after this timeframe, then the bed is irrigated and suctioned and a second equivalent dose is applied.

No pressure pack and no oxymetazoline or other topical vasoconstrictor is applied in either group during these initial hemostatic steps, since they are potential confounders of hemostatic effect.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Electrocautery (Monopolar suction cautery)

Monopolar suction electrocautery is used at 20 Watts. Cautery is applied with a light surface touch until bleeding has stopped. In addition, any prominent visible vessels are cauterized.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Arista Monopolar suction cautery

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Eligibility is contingent on the presence of following characteristics:

1. Children and adolescents age 5-18 years old. The lower age range is chosen in order to spare younger, smaller children who have less circulating volume to decrease any potential unwarranted risks of increased bleeding. The upper age range is chosen because our ultimate focus is to determine whether this therapy can help the pediatric population prevent the need for electrocautery under anesthesia for tonsil-related bleeding.
2. Obstructive sleep disorder symptomatology requiring surgical intervention. The presence of obstructive sleep disorder is determined according to the practice of the otolaryngologist investigator, and includes at least two of the following: medical history, physical exam findings, nasopharyngoscopy, lateral x-ray, sleep videotape, or polysomnography. In addition, the mean survey score on the OSD-6 (which is an instrument validated in children with obstructive sleep disorder (See Figure 2)) is at least 3, which corresponds to a moderate degree of symptoms (0 no symptoms, 6 symptoms could not be worse).
3. Tonsillar or adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Tonsillar hypertrophy is defined as at least 3+ tonsillar hypertrophy on a scale of 1+ to 4+, with the following definition of grades of obstruction determined by visual inspection: 1+ 0-25%, 2+ 26-50%, 3+ 51-75%, 4+ 76-100%.
4. Bilateral microdebrider tonsillotomy. This method of surgery is chosen because it (1) is a standard technique utilized by the surgeons involved in this study as treatment of obstructive tonsillar hypertrophy and (2) results in a relatively uniform, reproducible bleeding surface that requires hemostasis following tonsil removal.

Exclusion Criteria

Eligibility is contingent on the absence of following characteristics:

1. Personal or family history of bleeding diathesis or easy bruising. The introduction of this confounder should be avoided, given that the primary outcome is adequacy of hemostasis. Given that preoperative laboratory evaluation in the setting of no suggestive history has been shown to have low predictive values for successful perioperative hemostasis, enrolled subjects receive no preoperative laboratory screening.
2. Intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 14 days prior to surgery. Although there are several trials that suggest that postoperative administration of these drugs may have no impact on hemorrhage, the topic remains controversial due to the large numbers of subjects required to achieve adequate power in such studies. Thus, the introduction of this potential confounder is avoided, given that the primary outcome is adequacy of hemostasis.
3. Liver dysfunction. This disease state may also confound evaluation of hemostasis.
4. Cardiac, renal, or blood pressure disorder. These states may make children less tolerant of hemorrhage, and so they are excluded in order to minimize risk.
5. Chronic inflammation states, such as recurrent pharyngitis, may result in an increased propensity toward bleeding, and thus subjects with this potential confounder are excluded. Children with 3 or more acute pharyngitis episodes within the past year are excluded. A pharyngitis episode is defined as documentation by physician of the episode and \>1 of the following: oral \>38.3 degrees C, lymphadenopathy \>2cm or tender lymphadenopathy, tonsil/pharyngeal exudates, group A beta hemolytic streptococcus positive, or antibiotic administration for proved/suspected streptococcal infection.
6. Implant contraindications to the use of monopolar electrocautery. Metal implants would preclude safe randomization to the electrocautery treatment arm. There are no suspected or known contraindications to application of MPH at the tonsillar fossae.
7. Allergic or adverse reactions to requisite perioperative medications. The current protocol calls for the use of an antibiotic and narcotic pain medication in all subjects, with one second-line agent as a planned alternative. Thus, inability to tolerate both penicillin and macrolide antibiotics, or both oxycodone and codeine narcotics, precludes entry into the trial.
8. Children whose caregivers cannot commit to the 2 week follow up schedule. This schedule includes daily calls to evaluate bleeding and pain control.
9. Cognitive inability to report bleeding, adverse events, or pain control. Thus, children with mental retardation, communication disorders, developmental delay, and chronic pain states are also excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael J Cunningham, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09-04-031

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.