The Together on Diabetes Intervention - a Realist Evaluation
NCT ID: NCT04722289
Last Updated: 2021-01-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-12-01
2020-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Using a realistic evaluation approach, this study aimed to evaluate the implementation of a Danish peer support intervention, targeted on improving self-management and use of healthcare services among socially vulnerable people with type 2-diabetes ("peers"). The study focused on the mechanisms generating the intended outcomes. Further, how contextual factors in peers' everyday life facilitated or hindered the mechanisms to operate.
The study design is a multi-method case study (n=9). Data include qualitative semi-structured interviews with four key groups of informants (peer, peer supporter, project manager, and a diabetes nurse). Each type of informant per case was interviewed (n=25) to obtain different perspectives of how the peers' interacted, and benefited from the intervention. All interviews were completed immediately after the after the 6-month intervention.
Further, a quantitative survey was conducted among peers at baseline (N=9) and follow-up (N=9) to obtain information about how peers' individual contextual factors, such as their sociodemographic characteristics, co-morbidity, diabetes complications, social relations, and other life events influenced how they perceived and interacted in the intervention. Further, to measure improvements in their diabetes-self management (DSM) and use of healthcare services (outcomes). Questions from the Danish National Health Survey were used to measure DSM: (eating habits, physical activity,and medication intake). Use of healthcare services was measured by the number of times (during a 12-month period) the peers' attended diabetes controls at the GP; food therapist, and ophthalmologist or had other form of contacts with relevant health care services.
All data were collected between February 2018 and April 2020.
Hypothesis: 6-month individual face-to-face peer support provided by non-professional persons with T2D can improve self-management and use of healthcare services among socially vulnerable people with T2D if contextual factors such as peers' sociodemographic characteristics, health condition, and social relations facilitate their engagement in the intervention. Potential mechanisms that generate the expected outcomes might be: peers' motivation, trust, perceived beliefs and needs; and experience of being supported by the peer supporters.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Survey of People With Diabetes, Caregivers of People With Diabetes Parents of Children and Young People With Diabetes
NCT04073641
Rehabilitation of Type 2 Diabetes Patients.
NCT00284609
Can Diabetes Distress be Reduced by Improving Entry to Care for Type 2 Diabetes Patients
NCT05571306
Diabetes Self-Management Models to Reduce Health Disparities
NCT01221090
Individually Tailored Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes
NCT02015130
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
All peers and peer supporters included and matched in the intervention from February 2018 to July 2019 were invited by the project manager to participate in this study. In total, 9 out of 12 pairs who completed the intervention during this period accepted the invitation, and were thereby selected as cases. The peers were recruited through CfD (N=7), their GP (N=1), and the home care (N=2). The peer supporters were recruited among people who had completed a patient education in CFD (N=5), by members from the DDA (N=2), their GP (N=1), or by people who applied via 'Together on Diabetes' webpage (N=2).
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Together on Diabetes
The intervention consists of five components: Recruitment of peers and peer supporters; training of peer supporters; matching peers and peer supporters; individual face-to-face meetings between peers and peer supporters; and ongoing supervision and network meetings for peer supporters.
Together on Diabetes
Social and emotional support'; 'Assistance in daily management'; and 'Linkage to healthcare services'
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Together on Diabetes
Social and emotional support'; 'Assistance in daily management'; and 'Linkage to healthcare services'
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* multi-morbidity
* no employment
* low/no education
* no contact to the healthcare system
* living alone with no/spare social network.
* Well-regulated T2D
* Basic knowledge about T2D and the Danish healthcare system;
* Good communication skills
* Empathy
* An interest in supporting a socially vulnerable person with T2D
* Available two hours every second week for at least six-month (the intervention period).
Exclusion Criteria
Peer supporters
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novo Nordisk A/S
INDUSTRY
Innovation Fund Denmark
INDIV
University of Copenhagen
OTHER
The Danish Diabetes Association
OTHER
Center for Diabetes, Copenhagen Municipality
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stine Garn
Evaluator, PhD
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Garn SD, Glumer C, Villadsen SF, Malling GMH, Christensen U. Understanding the mechanisms generating outcomes in a Danish peer support intervention for socially vulnerable people with type 2-diabetes: a realist evaluation. Arch Public Health. 2021 Sep 6;79(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00676-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDiabetesCopenhagen
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.