Effectiveness of Electrical Neurostimulation in Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome.
NCT ID: NCT04721171
Last Updated: 2022-03-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
4 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-23
2021-02-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim 1. Investigate the efficacy of PENFS compared to a sham in patients with CVS seen in the ED or in the clinic or hospitalized with an acute CVS episode.
Objectives:
1. Demonstrate reduction in abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting using validated tools.
2. Obviate or reduce the need for opioids.
3. Reduce the length of hospital stay and improve patient satisfaction.
This approach will specifically address the current opioid problem using a novel, non-invasive neurostimulation therapy with proven efficacy for opioid withdrawal. Long-term, it may improve health care outcomes and significantly reduce overall health care costs.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Auricular Neurostimulation for Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
NCT03434652
Cortical Excitability in Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
NCT05256160
Defining Adolescent Nausea Through Brain Imaging and Neurostimulation Response
NCT03675321
Autonomic Reactivity and Personalized Neurostimulation
NCT06863207
Effect of Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Reducing Visually Induced Motion Sickness in Healthy Volunteers
NCT02177890
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Given the lack of knowledge about pathophysiology and evidence-based therapies, patients are often hospitalized to treat symptoms of CVS. During an episode, patients present with severe vomiting and abdominal pain and are treated empirically with IV fluids, antiemetics, benzodiazepines, and opioids. Estimates of opioid use range from 23%-27% in adults with CVS. Patients are often dissatisfied with the level of analgesia as recurrent opioid use results in tolerance and dependence. This often undermines the physician-patient relationship and patients even leave against medical advice out of frustration with what they perceive as ineffective care. This can lead to worse outcomes including recurrent hospitalizations, morbidity and increased health care costs.
Preliminary data from a study by our group reveals that of 101 patients hospitalized with CVS at Froedtert Hospital, chronic opioid therapy is associated with a two-fold increased risk of hospitalization (RR 2.22, CI 1.1-4.4, P=0.02) and three-fold increase in hospital length of stay (LOS) (RR 3.43, CI 1.26-9.34, P=0.01). In a study of 132 CVS patients, opioid use was associated with non-response to amitriptyline (53% vs 15%, p\<0.05), a prophylactic therapy used in CVS. This in turn was associated with increased frequency and duration of CVS episodes per year and increased number of hospitalizations/emergency department (ED) visits at baseline (18% vs 15.2%, p\<0.05). Hence there is an urgent need for an opioid-sparing, non-invasive strategy to treat CVS symptoms.
In summary, CVS is common and disabling and is associated with significant health care costs. Our proposed project using a novel, non-invasive device to treat CVS will also address the current opioid crisis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
The Bridge device is a non-invasive percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) applied to the external ear. The Bridge device delivers low voltage (3.2), continuous stimulation for 5 days (around the clock) in alternating frequencies (1-10Hz) with an impulse interval of 100ms/2 sec. This is placed on the ear as per standard protocol at the beginning of the study and removed by the patient after 5 days.
The Bridge device
he Bridge device is a non-invasive percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) applied to the external ear. The Bridge device delivers low voltage (3.2), continuous stimulation for 5 days (around the clock) in alternating frequencies (1-10Hz) with an impulse interval of 100ms/2 sec. This is placed on the ear as per standard protocol at the beginning of the study and removed by the patient after 5 days.
Placebo Group
The sham is similar in appearance to the Bridge device but does not deliver any electrical stimulation and is a sham that is designed to look identical to the Bridge device. It is placed on the external ear at the beginning of the study and removed by the patient after 5 days.
The Bridge device
he Bridge device is a non-invasive percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) applied to the external ear. The Bridge device delivers low voltage (3.2), continuous stimulation for 5 days (around the clock) in alternating frequencies (1-10Hz) with an impulse interval of 100ms/2 sec. This is placed on the ear as per standard protocol at the beginning of the study and removed by the patient after 5 days.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The Bridge device
he Bridge device is a non-invasive percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) applied to the external ear. The Bridge device delivers low voltage (3.2), continuous stimulation for 5 days (around the clock) in alternating frequencies (1-10Hz) with an impulse interval of 100ms/2 sec. This is placed on the ear as per standard protocol at the beginning of the study and removed by the patient after 5 days.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-English speaking patients
* Pregnancy
* Any implanted electrical device
* Any significant dermatological/infectious condition of the ear
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical College of Wisconsin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thangam Venkatesan
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thangam Venkatesan
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MCW
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRO00032752
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.