Analgesic Effect of rTMS in Vasculitic Neuropathy

NCT ID: NCT04720196

Last Updated: 2023-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-25

Study Completion Date

2023-09-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Vasculitic neuropathy (VN) results from inflammation and destruction of the walls of predominantly small vessels with subsequent ischemic damage of peripheral nerves. VN is painful in vast majority of patients and the pain is intractable with pharmacotherapy in about 40% of cases. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity and is regarded as one of alternative methods to alleviate pain associated with various kind of neuropathies. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of analgesic effect of rTMS in vasculitic neuropathy with sham stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Vasculitic neuropathies (VN) are a group of disorders resulting from inflammation of predominantly small vessels with destruction of their walls and subsequent ischemic damage of peripheral nerves. Neural damage may or may not coexist with the damage of other organs. Examples of conditions associated with VN include diabetes, microscopic polyangiitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's), rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and others. VN is painful in about 80% of patients of whom 40% suffer from the pain intractable with pharmacological therapy. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity. In this method, series of magnetic stimuli are delivered to the cerebral cortex, where they turn to electric current and depolarize repetitively the targeted neurons. If the stimulation is repeated during subsequent days it is capable to modify the activity of targeted cortical area for weeks or even months and by this way to achieve therapeutic effect. rTMS is widely regarded as one of alternative methods to alleviate pain associated with various kind of neuropathies. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of analgesic effect of rTMS in vasculitic neuropathy with sham stimulation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vasculitic Neuropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Patients will be randomly assigned to active and then sham stimulation or to sham and then active stimulation.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Sham stimulation will be provided by holding the stimulating coil perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as during active stimulation but prevents significant magnetic field to reach the brain tissue.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

10 hertz (Hz) rTMS will be administered over the primary motor area. Therapy will include 5 daily sessions (on consecutive week days). In every sessions 1500 magnetic pulses of 90% of the resting motor threshold intensity will be elicited.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

High frequency rTMS over the primary motor area to induce the long term potentiation of primary motor areas for the muscles of upper extremity.

Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Sham stimulation will mimic the active one except that the stimulating coil will be held perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as the active stimulation but prevents that significant magnetic field will reach brain tissue.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham stimulation to mimic the high frequency rTMS over the primary motor area.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

High frequency rTMS over the primary motor area to induce the long term potentiation of primary motor areas for the muscles of upper extremity.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Sham stimulation to mimic the high frequency rTMS over the primary motor area.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy
* Neuropathic pain of constant severity since not less than a month and requiring use of analgesics more than once a week
* Score of 30 milimeter or more on the 100 milimeter visual analog scale of pain intensity at inclusion

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe depression
* Personality disorders and other psychiatric conditions, which could disturb the participation in the study
* Cognitive deficits, which could disturb the participation in the study
* Contraindications for rTMS as listed by the Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Rossi et al. 2009) i.e. seizure in the past, epilepsy, presence of magnetic material in the reach of magnetic field, pregnancy, likelihood to get pregnant, intracranial electrodes, cardiac pacemaker or intracardiac lines, frequent syncopes
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jagiellonian University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jakub Antczak

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Justyna Brączyk, MS

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Jagiellonian University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Neurology

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19833552 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JagiellonianU63

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bilateral TMS vs. Unilateral TMS
NCT03710967 UNKNOWN NA