Comparison of Various Measures for Anticipating Difficult Laryngoscopy

NCT ID: NCT04711018

Last Updated: 2021-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

145 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-01

Study Completion Date

2020-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Demographic features and eight diagnostic variables were evaluated for difficult laryngoscopy (DL) predictivity. These were retrognathia, presence of buck teeth, modified Mallampati test (MMT), upper lip bite test (ULBT), sternomental distance (SMD), interincisor distance (IID), thyromental distance, and neck circumference. DL was identified by Grade III-IV view during laryngoscopy according to the Cormack-Lehane (CL) classification.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Creating a regression model among selected bedside tests for predicting difficult laryngoscopy )defined as Grade III or IV view during laryngoscopy according to Cormack-Lehane classification) is the primary objective. Recruiting of 145 ASA I-II adult patients who would have an elective surgery under general anesthesia were planned.

Criteria for exclusion were: a history of craniofacial surgery or restriction of cervical mobility, edentulous patients, pregnant women, patients who did not have a proper mouth opening (\< 3 cm), and those who might require awake intubation or rapid sequence induction, cancellation of the surgery or change in the anesthetic strategy.

The selected tests and clinical situations were:

The presence of retrognathia (reduced temporomandibular joint-incisor distance) Buck teeth Modified Mallampati test (MMT) in the sitting position without phonation. A scale ranging between 1 and 4 points is used and scores of 3 or 4 are considered as predictors of DL. Upper lip bite test (ULBT) performed in a neutral position. ULBT is graded as 1-3 according to the extension ability of lower incisors.

Sternomental distance - The distance between the mentum and upper border of the manubrium sterni when the head is fully extended and the mouth is closed.

Thyromental distance (TMD) - The distance between mentum and the thyroid notch when the head is fully extended.

Interincisor distance (IID) - The distance between upper and lower incisors when the mouth is fully opened.

Neck circumference (NC) - It was measured at the level of the cricoid cartilage, perpendicular to the cervical axis.

The patients are premedicated with 0.03 mg/kg and oxygenated with the help of a bag-mask. Anesthesia is induced by consequent administration of 2 mcg/kg fentanyl, 1 mg/kg lidocaine, 2 mg/kg propofol, and 0.7 mg/kg rocuronium bromide thereafter. Two minutes after induction, the laryngoscopy is performed

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Difficult Laryngoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group DL (+)

Grade III or IV laryngeal view according to Cormack-Lehane classification

Laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The laryngoscopy is performed with the help of an appropriate size Macintosh blade. The patient's head is held in the sniffing position. External manipulation is not used for improving the view in this investigation.

Group DL (-)

Grade I or II laryngeal view according to Cormack-Lehane classification

Laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The laryngoscopy is performed with the help of an appropriate size Macintosh blade. The patient's head is held in the sniffing position. External manipulation is not used for improving the view in this investigation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laryngoscopy

The laryngoscopy is performed with the help of an appropriate size Macintosh blade. The patient's head is held in the sniffing position. External manipulation is not used for improving the view in this investigation.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I-II
* Candidate for elective surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* History of craniofacial surgery or restriction of cervical mobility,
* Edentulous patients
* Pregnancy
* Patients who do not have a proper mouth opening (\< 3 cm)
* Patients who might require awake intubation or rapid sequence induction.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Avcılar Murat Koluk State Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yedikule Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Derya Ozden Omaygenc

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Avcılar Murat Koluk State Hospital

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology. 2005 Aug;103(2):429-37. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200508000-00027.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16052126 (View on PubMed)

el-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Tanck EN, Ivankovich AD. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg. 1996 Jun;82(6):1197-204. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199606000-00017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8638791 (View on PubMed)

Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Benumof JL, Berry FA, Blitt CD, Bode RH, Cheney FW, Connis RT, Guidry OF, Nickinovich DG, Ovassapian A; American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):251-70. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23364566 (View on PubMed)

Kim JC, Ki Y, Kim J, Ahn SW. Ethnic considerations in the upper lip bite test: the reliability and validity of the upper lip bite test in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in Koreans. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0675-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30630419 (View on PubMed)

Yildirim I, Inal MT, Memis D, Turan FN. Determining the Efficiency of Different Preoperative Difficult Intubation Tests on Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section. Balkan Med J. 2017 Sep 29;34(5):436-443. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2016.0877. Epub 2017 Apr 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28443579 (View on PubMed)

Selvi O, Kahraman T, Senturk O, Tulgar S, Serifsoy E, Ozer Z. Evaluation of the reliability of preoperative descriptive airway assessment tests in prediction of the Cormack-Lehane score: A prospective randomized clinical study. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;36:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28183567 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HasekiTRERH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes
NCT06649526 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING