The Indications of First Molar Extraction at Tufts University, School of Dental Medicine

NCT ID: NCT04705181

Last Updated: 2025-09-19

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
• Total Enrollment: 240 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2020-03-19
• Study Completion Date: 2028-06-30

Brief Summary

The aim of the present study is to investigate whether there has been a change of criteria for tooth extraction at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) from 2005 to 2018. The primary outcome is the change of mean of radiographic interproximal bone loss of extracted teeth. The secondary outcomes are changes of other parameters (periodontal, endodontic and restorative) of extracted teeth and reasons for extraction.

Detailed Description

The purpose of the present study is to quantitatively evaluate the change in tooth extraction at school setting over the past 14 years.

Aims The aim of the present study is to investigate whether there has been a change of criteria for tooth extraction at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) from 2005 to 2018. The primary outcome is the change of mean of radiographic interproximal bone loss of extracted teeth. The secondary outcomes are changes of other parameters (periodontal, endodontic and restorative) of extracted teeth and reasons for extraction.

Hypothesis Criteria for extraction of first molar teeth has changed between 2005 and 2018 toward early extraction of teeth with less severe periodontal and other conditions.

Significance Currently, there is not study presenting the quantified data for criteria change for tooth extraction. Also, determining whether to extract a tooth or not actually requires taking several clinical parameters into consideration. The present study will give clinicians a broad review of the change in clinical decision making for tooth extraction.

Materials and Methods Retrospective chart review among patients in TUSDM Pre-doctoral and Post-doctoral Group Practices The study setting is among patients who received dental treatments at TUSDM. The database will be retrospectively reviewed by patients' electronic records in TUSDM Postgraduate (PG) and Undergraduate (UG) clinics from 01/01/2005 till 12/31/2018.

Conditions

Tooth Extraction

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: OTHER
• Study Time Perspective: RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients who had fully-erupted first molar extraction (tooth number #3 or #14 or #19 or #30) under Code on Dental Procedures and Nomenclature (CDT) code of D7140 (Extraction, erupted tooth or exposed root) and D7210 (Extraction, erupted tooth requiring removal of bone and/or sectioning of tooth, and including elevation of mucoperiosteal flap if indicated) at TUSDM.

2. The electronic records must include the following data:

• Gender
• Age
• Comprehensive periodontal chart, including probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), furcation involvement and mobility. The periodontal chart has to be recorded within 12 months before tooth extraction
• Periapical radiograph and bite-wing radiographs of extracted tooth. The radiographs have to be taken within 12 months before tooth extraction
• Reasons for tooth extraction

Part 2:

1. Patients who had:

• Fully-erupted first and second molars (tooth number #2, #3, #14, #15, #18, #19, #30, #31) that were extracted under CDT codes D7140 (Extraction, erupted tooth or exposed root) or D7210 (Extraction, erupted tooth requiring removal of bone and/or sectioning of tooth, and including elevation of mucoperiosteal flap if indicated).
• The same extracted tooth were replace with dental implant placement under CDT code D6010 (Surgical placement, endosteal implant) within 24 months after extraction.

2. The electronic records must include the following data

• Sex
• Age
• Dental records including:

• Periapical radiograph of the tooth before extraction: the radiographs have to be taken within 12 months before tooth extraction, including one or more of probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), furcation involvement and tooth mobility.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Absence of tooth distal to extracted tooth.

a. Clinical decision for tooth extraction may be affected by tooth location. When the tooth is the distal abutment in the dentition, clinicians tend to keep the tooth even if the prognosis is compromised.

2. Presence of dental implant adjacent to extracted tooth a. Clinical decision for tooth extraction may be affected by adjacent dental implants.

• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Tufts University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Bjorn Steffensen

Professor and Chair Department of Periodontology

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Bjorn Steffensen, DDS, MS, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tufts University School of Dental Medicine

Locations

Tufts University School of Dental Medicine

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Countries

United States

Other Identifiers

STUDY00000314

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id