Exophthalmometry With 3D Face Scanners

NCT ID: NCT04704414

Last Updated: 2021-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-14

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study investigates diagnostic methods to measure eyeball protrusion with a smartphone face scanner compared to the traditional Hertel exophthalmometer. The study aims to validate a new reliable, fast and convenient smartphone app to measure the protrusion of the eyeball in different diseases such as Graves' disease, orbital tumors, orbital fractures or orbital inflammation, as well as other rare diseases.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND: Accurate and reproducible measures of abnormal eyeball protrusion are important for diagnosing different causes of exophthalmos, as well as following patients with Grave's orbitopathy and retroorbital tumors. The current clinical gold standards for measuring abnormal eyeball protrusion is the Hertel exophthalmometer, which is prone to reading errors and inconvenient to use.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the EX3D-project is to replace the historic Hertel Exophthalmometer with a state-of-the-art mobile smartphone app that every ophthalmologist can carry in his pocket.

METHODS: The investigators developed an accurate and easy to use method for measuring abnormal eyeball protrusion using the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 11 in comparison with a high-resolution 3D scanner as a reference to compare with the Hertel Exophthalmometer.

OUTCOMES:

1. Accuracy and precision of 3D face-scanner and iPhone in comparison to Hertel Exophthalmometer.
2. Test re-test reliability in comparison to Hertel Exophthalmometer.
3. Inter-operator reliability against Hertel Exophthalmometer.
4. Patients before and after exophthalmos changing treatment.
5. Applicability in daily clinical practice.

BROADER IMPACT: The invention makes exophthalmometry quick, easy and objective. A mobile smartphone application would replace measurements with the traditional Hertel Exophthalmometer, which are cumbersome, prone to reading errors and have a poor inter-rater reliability as well as test-retest reliability.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Exophthalmos Graves Ophthalmopathy Orbital Tumor Orbital Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

* Accuracy and precision of smartphone in comparison with 3D face scanner and Hertel exophthalmometer
* Test-retest reliability
* Inter-operator reliability
* Before and after exophthalmos-changing intervention
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Blinding of the operators of Hertel exophthalmometer for previous measurement results.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Validation of smartphone face scanner

Validation of smartphone face scanner in comparison to Hertel Exophthalmometer and high-definition face scanner.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exophthalmos measurement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Exophthalmos measurement with iPhone 11 vs Artec Space Spider 3D Scanner vs Hertel Exophthalmometer.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exophthalmos measurement

Exophthalmos measurement with iPhone 11 vs Artec Space Spider 3D Scanner vs Hertel Exophthalmometer.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Written informed consent
* Able to cooperate with the study investigations (hearing, comprehension)
* Exophthalmos (Grave's disease, orbital tumors, orbital inflammation, orbital fractures, rare causes (congenital, e.g. microphthalmos)
* health controls

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to sign informed consent
* Unable to cooperate with the examinations (hearing loss, neurological deficits)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Konrad Peter Weber

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital Zurich

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Konrad P Weber, MD

Role: primary

0041442555549

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CIV-19-08-029404

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

10000520

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BASEC-Nr. 2019-00233

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.