The Comparison of Educational Effectiveness Between FAST and STROKE 112 in Yunlin Community
NCT ID: NCT04699409
Last Updated: 2021-01-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-01
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validations of the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke
NCT05524818
Epidural Electrical Stimulation for Stroke Patients - Improve Motor and Sensory Function and Alleviate Pain
NCT05981989
Effect of Thermal Stimulation for Lower Extremity Movement and Function in Patients With Stroke
NCT01668420
Comparison the Effects of Early Functional Electrical Stimulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerves Stimulation in Functional and Motor Recovery for Acute Stroke Patients
NCT03304340
Combined Behavioral Approaches With Functional Electrical Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT01523925
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Prehospital delay of acute stroke treatment has been an important issue in modern medical system. Awareness of stroke symptoms and calling for medical help immediately is the most important part of stroke health education. The most used educational campaign is FAST.
In recent years, there is another stroke educational campaign called STROKE 112. Previous study had showed it has greater acceptance, since the number is easier to remember then letter, especially in non-English speaking countries.
The investigators had conducted a hospital-based randomized study in 2019, which revealed that STROKE 112 had similar, but not superior effectiveness with FAST. However, more study is needed for community-based population.
This study will compare and explore the effectiveness of two stroke educational campaigns, FAST and STROKE 112, on community-based population by using the questionnaire, in Yunlin, Taiwan. The result will been compared and analyzed with previous study, help us modify and enhance our current stroke educational program, shorten the prehospital delay, and improve outcomes of patients with acute stroke.
The subjects will be randomized into either group: FAST or STROKE 112. Then the investigator will give a 15min eduacation. The evaluation will be arranged 5 days and 30 days after the first education, and the outcome is the recalling capacity of the stroke symptoms in the educational campaign.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FAST
stroke education: FAST
stroke educational campaign: FAST
After randomization, study staff provided 15-minute education on the selected campaign to each individual participant using educational pictures.
STROKE 112
stroke education: STROKE 112
stroke educational campaign: STROKE 112
After randomization, study staff provided 15-minute education on the selected campaign to each individual participant using educational pictures.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
stroke educational campaign: FAST
After randomization, study staff provided 15-minute education on the selected campaign to each individual participant using educational pictures.
stroke educational campaign: STROKE 112
After randomization, study staff provided 15-minute education on the selected campaign to each individual participant using educational pictures.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* individuals who could speak either Mandarin or Taiwanese as their mother tongue
Exclusion Criteria
* individuals who were previously aware about either campaign
20 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
YiTe Tsai, Bachelor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Taiwan University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch
Douliu, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Dr. Tsai
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202009041RIND
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.