Intervention Study of EMG Biofeedback Assisted Force Control to Treat Stroke Movement Disorder

NCT ID: NCT01962662

Last Updated: 2013-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Force generation and force level control are important neuromuscular control mechanism for successful execution of movement for our daily activities. Impaired force level control is a major deficit of motor control in people with stroke. Electromyographic biofeedback (EMG biofeedback) has been suggested by researchers and clinicians to be a useful and effective tool for enhancing control of force level during motor skill learning for people with stroke. Based on the concept of motor-skill learning, practice with variable force levels may be more effective than practice with a constant force level to enhance movement performance. The EMG biofeedback provides a suitable tool for such practice of force level control and hence for motor skill learning. However, research literatures thus far have yet to provide convincing evidences to support this claim. Neural imaging studies have shown corresponding brain reorganization and neural plasticity following physical practice of movement skills in people with stroke. It is curious whether EMG biofeedback augmented physical practice of motor skills enhances brain reorganization. Using brain mapping techniques, in particular, the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we could investigate neural plasticity accompanying motor function changes induced by physical training, and hence may help to develop safer and more effective training parameters. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of variable practiced EMG biofeedback training emphasized on force level control of the ankle muscle on balance and gait performance and the corresponding changes of corticospinal excitability using TMS in people with chronic stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Force generation and force level control are important neuromuscular control mechanism for successful execution of movement for our daily activities. Impaired force level control is a major deficit of motor control in people with stroke. Electromyographic biofeedback (EMG biofeedback) has been suggested by researchers and clinicians to be a useful and effective tool for enhancing control of force level during motor skill learning for people with stroke. Based on the concept of motor-skill learning, practice with variable force levels may be more effective than practice with a constant force level to enhance movement performance. The EMG biofeedback provides a suitable tool for such practice of force level control and hence for motor skill learning. However, research literatures thus far have yet to provide convincing evidences to support this claim. Neural imaging studies have shown corresponding brain reorganization and neural plasticity following physical practice of movement skills in people with stroke. It is curious whether EMG biofeedback augmented physical practice of motor skills enhances brain reorganization. Using brain mapping techniques, in particular, the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we could investigate neural plasticity accompanying motor function changes induced by physical training, and hence may help to develop safer and more effective training parameters. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of variable practiced EMG biofeedback training emphasized on force level control of the ankle muscle on balance and gait performance and the corresponding changes of corticospinal excitability using TMS in people with chronic stroke. Study Design and Methods: This study is a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Sixty participants will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of the three groups: constant practice, variable practice and control group. Each participant receives 3 days per week for a total of 6 weeks of EMG biofeedback assisted force level control training of the Tibialis Anterior (TA) muscle. For the variable practice group, the participants will practice exertion of force output levels at 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% of maximal TA muscle strength with EMG feedback. For the constant practice group, the goal of force level control training is 100% of maximal strength. The control group participants will practice maximal TA muscle control without EMG feedback. Balance and gait-related motor functions, such as TA force control error, TA strength, ankle range of motion, calf muscle spasticity, walking speed, Timed Up and Go test, Six-minute Walking test, and dynamic balance test and corticospinal excitability including threshold, latency, and recruitment curve of TA motor evoked (MEP) potentials will be evaluated at baseline, post-training, two weeks after training and six weeks after training. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS)13.0 will be used for statistical analysis. Anticipated results: We anticipate that all three groups of participants may demonstrate changes in maximal weight shift amplitude, gait speed and corticospinal excitability. However, only the variable practice group will demonstrate ability to modify and vary force level control during balance and gait tasks, and reveal corresponding changes in recruitment curve of TA MEP.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Feedback, Psychological Motor Deficit

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

stroke transcranial magnetic stimulation EMG biofeedback motor function neural plasticity force

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

variable practice

EMG biofeedback training on force control muscle the goal of force level control training is 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximal strength.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EMG biofeedback training

Intervention Type OTHER

EMG biofeedback assisted tibialis anterial force level control

constant practice group

EMG biofeedback training on force control muscle the goal of force level control training is 100% of maximal strength.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EMG biofeedback training

Intervention Type OTHER

EMG biofeedback assisted tibialis anterial force level control

control group

U/E exercise

Group Type OTHER

U/E exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

strengthening and stretching

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EMG biofeedback training

EMG biofeedback assisted tibialis anterial force level control

Intervention Type OTHER

U/E exercise

strengthening and stretching

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* stroke over three months
* unilateral hemiplegia or hemiparesis
* ankle movement deficit
* independent standing over 20 seconds
* independent walking over 10 meters
* can follow order

Exclusion Criteria

* no parkinsonism, hip and knee arthroplasty
* no acute L/E pain
* no epilepsy history
* no pacemaker
* no metal device in head
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ming-Hsia Hu, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ming-Hsia Hu, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 886-2-33668137

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tsaih PL, Chiu MJ, Luh JJ, Yang YR, Lin JJ, Hu MH. Practice Variability Combined with Task-Oriented Electromyographic Biofeedback Enhances Strength and Balance in People with Chronic Stroke. Behav Neurol. 2018 Nov 26;2018:7080218. doi: 10.1155/2018/7080218. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30598705 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NSC 100-2314-B-002 -152 -

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

201101080RB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id