Validations of the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke
NCT ID: NCT05524818
Last Updated: 2022-09-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
76 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-04-14
2022-02-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: Patients in both chronic (get stroke over 6 months) and sub-acute (get stroke less than 6 months) stages will be recruited. These patients will be classified into "test-retest reliability group" and "responsiveness group" to examine the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the CAT-FAS, respectively. All participants will receive the administrations of CAT-FAS twice. For those in the test-retest reliability group, the administrations will be performed with a 4-week interval. For those in the responsiveness group, the administrations will be performed at admitting to the rehabilitation unit and before they are discharged.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Psychometric Evaluation of Commonly Used Measures in Stroke
NCT05530525
Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Upright Motor Control Test in Patients With Stroke
NCT03471598
Smart Phone for Stroke Upper Limb Motor Function Training
NCT05217329
Neuroarchitectural Recovery Model of Post-stroke Patients
NCT06825598
The Effects of Early Mobilization in Stroke Patients on Functional Status, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life
NCT05381220
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Test-retest reliability Outpatients with chronic stroke were recruited to examine the test-retest reliability. The participants met the following criteria: (1) diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction, (2) age ≥ 20 years, (3) stroke onset ≥ 6 months (first and recurrent stroke included), and (4) ability to follow 3-step verbal instructions.
Responsiveness Inpatients undergoing rehabilitation with subacute stroke were recruited to examine the responsiveness. The participants met the following criteria: (1) diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction, (2) age ≥ 20 years, (3) stroke onset \< 3 months (first and recurrent stroke included), and (4) ability to follow 3-step verbal instructions.
Procedures Test-retest design was adopted. The data were collected by an experienced and well-trained occupational therapist, and included demographic characteristics, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and the the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke (CAT-FAS). The demographic and clinical characteristics were gathered from medical records. The NIHSS and the CAT-FAS were administered by the therapist twice, at different intervals depending on the groups. For the participants in the test-retest reliability group, the two assessments were performed at an one-month interval. For participants in the responsiveness group, the two assessments were administered at study commencement and hospital discharge.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Test-retest reliability group
All the participants received conventional rehabilitation (e.g., occupational therapy, physical therapy, or speech therapy) or other interventions (e.g., acupuncture) as usual during the research period.
the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke (CAT-FAS)
The CAT-FAS comprises 58 items. The items were selected from four well-known physical function measures for patients with stroke: 26 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Limb, 11 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Limb, 12 items from the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients, and 9 items from the Barthel Index. These items evaluate motor control, postural control, and activity of daily living functions in patients with stroke. The CAT-FAS assesses all these functions simultaneously. Results are automatically reported as Rasch scores. A higher score indicates greater physical functions. In the previous study, results indicated that the CAT-FAS had sufficient efficiency (\< 10 items on average), reliability (Rasch reliability ≥ 0.88), concurrent validity (Pearson r ≥ 0.91), and responsiveness (SRM ≥ 0.65) in persons with stroke.
Responsiveness group
All the participants received conventional rehabilitation (e.g., occupational therapy, physical therapy, or speech therapy) or other interventions (e.g., acupuncture) as usual during the research period.
the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke (CAT-FAS)
The CAT-FAS comprises 58 items. The items were selected from four well-known physical function measures for patients with stroke: 26 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Limb, 11 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Limb, 12 items from the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients, and 9 items from the Barthel Index. These items evaluate motor control, postural control, and activity of daily living functions in patients with stroke. The CAT-FAS assesses all these functions simultaneously. Results are automatically reported as Rasch scores. A higher score indicates greater physical functions. In the previous study, results indicated that the CAT-FAS had sufficient efficiency (\< 10 items on average), reliability (Rasch reliability ≥ 0.88), concurrent validity (Pearson r ≥ 0.91), and responsiveness (SRM ≥ 0.65) in persons with stroke.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke (CAT-FAS)
The CAT-FAS comprises 58 items. The items were selected from four well-known physical function measures for patients with stroke: 26 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Limb, 11 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Limb, 12 items from the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients, and 9 items from the Barthel Index. These items evaluate motor control, postural control, and activity of daily living functions in patients with stroke. The CAT-FAS assesses all these functions simultaneously. Results are automatically reported as Rasch scores. A higher score indicates greater physical functions. In the previous study, results indicated that the CAT-FAS had sufficient efficiency (\< 10 items on average), reliability (Rasch reliability ≥ 0.88), concurrent validity (Pearson r ≥ 0.91), and responsiveness (SRM ≥ 0.65) in persons with stroke.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 20 years.
* Stroke onset ≥ 6 months (first and recurrent stroke included).
* Ability to follow 3-step verbal instructions.
* Cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction.
* Age ≥ 20 years.
* Stroke onset \< 3 months (first and recurrent stroke included).
* Ability to follow 3-step verbal instructions.
Exclusion Criteria
* Refuse to provide informed consent.
20 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
Hualien City, Hualien County, Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB109-176-B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.