Validations of the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke

NCT ID: NCT05524818

Last Updated: 2022-09-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-14

Study Completion Date

2022-02-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purposes: The aim of this study is to preliminarily validate the test-retest reliability, random measurement error, practice effect, and responsiveness of the the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke (CAT-FAS) in real clinical settings.

Methods: Patients in both chronic (get stroke over 6 months) and sub-acute (get stroke less than 6 months) stages will be recruited. These patients will be classified into "test-retest reliability group" and "responsiveness group" to examine the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the CAT-FAS, respectively. All participants will receive the administrations of CAT-FAS twice. For those in the test-retest reliability group, the administrations will be performed with a 4-week interval. For those in the responsiveness group, the administrations will be performed at admitting to the rehabilitation unit and before they are discharged.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants Persons with stroke were recruited from the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at a medical center in Taiwan using consecutive sampling. The study was approved by the local institutional review board, and all of the participants provided informed consent. Because the targeted populations for examining the test-retest reliability and responsiveness were different, the inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed separately below.

Test-retest reliability Outpatients with chronic stroke were recruited to examine the test-retest reliability. The participants met the following criteria: (1) diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction, (2) age ≥ 20 years, (3) stroke onset ≥ 6 months (first and recurrent stroke included), and (4) ability to follow 3-step verbal instructions.

Responsiveness Inpatients undergoing rehabilitation with subacute stroke were recruited to examine the responsiveness. The participants met the following criteria: (1) diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction, (2) age ≥ 20 years, (3) stroke onset \< 3 months (first and recurrent stroke included), and (4) ability to follow 3-step verbal instructions.

Procedures Test-retest design was adopted. The data were collected by an experienced and well-trained occupational therapist, and included demographic characteristics, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and the the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke (CAT-FAS). The demographic and clinical characteristics were gathered from medical records. The NIHSS and the CAT-FAS were administered by the therapist twice, at different intervals depending on the groups. For the participants in the test-retest reliability group, the two assessments were performed at an one-month interval. For participants in the responsiveness group, the two assessments were administered at study commencement and hospital discharge.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Test-retest reliability group

All the participants received conventional rehabilitation (e.g., occupational therapy, physical therapy, or speech therapy) or other interventions (e.g., acupuncture) as usual during the research period.

the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke (CAT-FAS)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The CAT-FAS comprises 58 items. The items were selected from four well-known physical function measures for patients with stroke: 26 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Limb, 11 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Limb, 12 items from the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients, and 9 items from the Barthel Index. These items evaluate motor control, postural control, and activity of daily living functions in patients with stroke. The CAT-FAS assesses all these functions simultaneously. Results are automatically reported as Rasch scores. A higher score indicates greater physical functions. In the previous study, results indicated that the CAT-FAS had sufficient efficiency (\< 10 items on average), reliability (Rasch reliability ≥ 0.88), concurrent validity (Pearson r ≥ 0.91), and responsiveness (SRM ≥ 0.65) in persons with stroke.

Responsiveness group

All the participants received conventional rehabilitation (e.g., occupational therapy, physical therapy, or speech therapy) or other interventions (e.g., acupuncture) as usual during the research period.

the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke (CAT-FAS)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The CAT-FAS comprises 58 items. The items were selected from four well-known physical function measures for patients with stroke: 26 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Limb, 11 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Limb, 12 items from the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients, and 9 items from the Barthel Index. These items evaluate motor control, postural control, and activity of daily living functions in patients with stroke. The CAT-FAS assesses all these functions simultaneously. Results are automatically reported as Rasch scores. A higher score indicates greater physical functions. In the previous study, results indicated that the CAT-FAS had sufficient efficiency (\< 10 items on average), reliability (Rasch reliability ≥ 0.88), concurrent validity (Pearson r ≥ 0.91), and responsiveness (SRM ≥ 0.65) in persons with stroke.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke (CAT-FAS)

The CAT-FAS comprises 58 items. The items were selected from four well-known physical function measures for patients with stroke: 26 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Limb, 11 items from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Limb, 12 items from the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients, and 9 items from the Barthel Index. These items evaluate motor control, postural control, and activity of daily living functions in patients with stroke. The CAT-FAS assesses all these functions simultaneously. Results are automatically reported as Rasch scores. A higher score indicates greater physical functions. In the previous study, results indicated that the CAT-FAS had sufficient efficiency (\< 10 items on average), reliability (Rasch reliability ≥ 0.88), concurrent validity (Pearson r ≥ 0.91), and responsiveness (SRM ≥ 0.65) in persons with stroke.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction.
* Age ≥ 20 years.
* Stroke onset ≥ 6 months (first and recurrent stroke included).
* Ability to follow 3-step verbal instructions.


* Cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction.
* Age ≥ 20 years.
* Stroke onset \< 3 months (first and recurrent stroke included).
* Ability to follow 3-step verbal instructions.

Exclusion Criteria

* Cannot complete the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke twice.
* Refuse to provide informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation

Hualien City, Hualien County, Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB109-176-B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Kinesio Taping in Stroke Patient
NCT06188845 COMPLETED NA